Channel
@brazzers_crypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
479subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002050015198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brazzers_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brazzers_crypto |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 479 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 483 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 485 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 488 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 493 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 494 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 494 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 25 | 53.2% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 17.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 10.6% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новая фобия — взломы холодных кошельков 🛡 Холодные кошельки считаются самым надежным методом хранения крипты. Якобы из таких кошельков невозможно вывести средства, если физическое 📲 устройство не подключено к ПК. 👉 Даже если мошенник получал доступ к кошельку, система отказывалась делать транзакции: закинул в такой кошелек крипту, спрятал физическое устройство дома и спишь спокойно. Но на днях взломали холодный ко…
❤1
И после этого кто-то говорит, что на рынке нельзя заработать. Можно, если постараться.
Илон Маск стал первым человеком в истории, чьи потери достигли $500 млрд. Почти полтриллиона долларов бизнесмен лишился из-за падения стоимости акций SpaceX.😁
❤2
Ты просыпаешься в 2028ом…Иран в 742 раз закрывает пролив, а Трамп в 742 раз его открывает и выигрывает войну
😁3🔥2❤1🤪1
BTC закрыл 7 красных месячных свечей в этом цикле За последние циклы дно формировалось только после 9 убыточных месяцев, поэтому многие считают, что текущая коррекция ещё не завершена.
🔥1😱1
Почти миллион покупателей криптовалюты Трампа потеряли деньги Nansen: Совокупные убытки купивших мемкоин TRUMP достигли $3,81 млрд к концу июня. Почти миллион человек, купивших одноименный мемкоин президента США Дональда Трампа, в итоге потеряли свои деньги. Об этом сообщает The New York Times (NYT) со ссылкой на данные аналитической компании Nansen, специализирующейся на криптовалютах. Речь идет о мемкоине TRUMP. …
😭1😱1
Инвесторы в ИИ акции и чипы прямо сейчас
⚡1
Утопите ETH в крови , я куплю😁
😁2
Эфир -6% щиток
Биткоин летит в дно, пробивая $60 000. ❣️
Нефть — -41%. Платина — -46%. Палладий — -45%. Золото — -30%. Серебро — -52%. Как там «надёжные» активы?😁
😁3🤪1
Илон как спишь по ночам ? 😂😂😂😂😂 хомяки негодуют
😁3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brazzers_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BRAZZER💲CRYPTO” (@brazzers_crypto), 479 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brazzers_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.