Channel
@break_new
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,373subscribers
-440 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001006070709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @break_new |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/break_new |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 8,373 | -17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 8,390 | -21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 8,411 | -50 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 8,461 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:48 | 8,481 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 8,497 | -30 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 8,527 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 8,549 | -43 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 8,592 | -96 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 8,688 | -40 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 8,728 | -43 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 8,771 | -33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 8,804 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 8,813 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 8,813 | first reading |
436 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 137 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 436 (7 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42,445 |
| Reactions total | 130 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
289 reactions across 139 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 18.0% | |
| 👍 | 48 | 16.6% | |
| 👎 | 32 | 11.1% | |
| 💩 | 30 | 10.4% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 7.61% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 7.27% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 5.54% | |
| 🖕 | 16 | 5.54% | |
| 🤮 | 11 | 3.81% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 2.77% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.38% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 1.38% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 1.38% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 1.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 436 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔸همتی: تا مرز ورود به ابر تورم پیش رفته بودیم رئیس بانک مرکزی گفت: علیرغم تمام فشارهای سنگین و ائتلافهای خصمانهای که در حوزه اقتصادی بر کشور تحمیل شده، با مدیریت دقیق موفق شدیم از ابتدای سال جاری تاکنون بیش از ۱۷.۲ میلیارد دلار ارز برای تأمین نیازهای کشور تخصیص و تأمین کنیم. وقتی میگن تا مرز ابرتورم پیش رفته بودیم، یعنی مردم احتمالاً باید از این به بعد برای خرید یه کیلو گوشت، با ماشینحسابِ تورم برن قصابی!!!!!!😂…
تراژدی یعنی همتی رو بخاطر دلار ۳۰ ت از ریاست بانک مرکزی برکنار میکنن دوباره تو دلار ۵۰ت رئیس بانک مرکزیش میکنن و باز هم بخاطر دلار ۸۰ت بر کنارش میکنن و دوباره تو دلار ۱۴۰ ت رئیس بانک مرکزیش میکنن و وقتی دلار به ۲۰۰ ت میگه نگران نباشین اوضاع تحت کنترله دقیقا دارین چیکار میکنین؟ @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
دستیار رئیسجمهور روسیه: پوتین ۱۰ شهریور با پزشکیان دیدار میکند 🔹دستیار رئیسجمهور روسیه در امور سیاست خارجی اعلام کرد که ولادیمیر پوتین رئیسجمهور این کشور دوشنبه ۱۰ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ با مسعود پزشکیان رئیس جمهوری اسلامی ایران دیدار و گفتوگو خواهد کرد. @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
ریزش 100 دلاری انس
👍1
آکسیوس: 🔹مقامات آمریکایی اعلام کردهاند که ارتش ایالات متحده، کنترل ایران بر تنگه هرمز را به طور قابل توجهی کاهش داده است، که این میتواند یک نقطه عطف باشد و به تدریج فشار اقتصادی جهانی را کاهش دهد. 🔹ایران به سمت کشتیها شلیک کرده است، اما دقت این شلیکها "محدود" بوده است، به طوری که تنها حدود ۲ درصد از کشتیهایی که ماه گذشته از این تنگه عبور کردهاند، مورد اصابت قرار گرفتهاند. 🔹مقامات گفتهاند که بیش از ۲۰۰ شیء …
❤1🔥1
🚫خبرنگار: اگر قصد حمله زمینی به ایران ندارد پس چرا نیروهای بیشتری را مستقر میکنید؟ 🚫 هگزت: هیچ وقت اجازه نده دشمنت از قصد تو باخبر شود، به ویژه دشمنی که از ترس در پناهگاهها پنهان میشوند و مثل یک بزدل خسیس موشکهایش را ذخیره میکند! 🚫وزیر انرژی آمریکا کریس رایت: اگه ایرانم مثل عربستان به ما باج بده مشکلی باهاش نداریم! @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
‼️وزارت خزانهداری آمریکا: تحریمهای جدیدی علیه ایران وضع میکنیم @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
🖕1
🔺 شهبازی: این تفاهمنامه ترکمنچای بود که ما به آمریکا تحمیل کردیم؛ از برجام ظریف بهتر است 🔸 هر وقت سفارت سوئیس و چین یا روسیه بسته شدند، یعنی اوضاع قرمز است. @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
🤮1
🔺 رئیسجمهور امشب با مردم سخن میگوید 🔸 رئیسجمهور به مناسبت هفته دولت امشب با مردم سخن میگوید. 🔸گفتگوی ویژه دکتر «مسعود پزشکیان» بعد از خبر ساعت ۲۱ از شبکه یک و خبر سیما و رادیو صدای ایران پخش میشود. @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
🔺 هوش مصنوعی از کنترل خارج شد! 🔸گزارشهای جدید میگویند حدود ۱۲۰۰ ایجنت هوش مصنوعی که قرار بود جدا از هم فعالیت کنند، راهی برای ارتباط مخفیانه با یکدیگر پیدا کردند. 🔸آنها بیش از ۷۰ هزار پیام و فایل ردوبدل کردند و حدود ۷۰۰ ایجنت نیز در تلاشهایی برای حمله به زیرساختهای Hugging Face مشارکت داشتند. 🔸حتی برخی از آنها تلاش کردند فعالیت خود را از سیستمهای نظارتی مخفی کنند. @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
🔺 وزیر کار: یک کارخانهدار میگفت وقتی اعلام نیاز به نیروی کار کردیم ۳۰۰ نفر برای کار مراجعه کردهاند و همه با حقوق پیشنهادی زیر هشت میلیون تومان آمده بودند! @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
👎3
🔺 به هم زدن سخنرانی وزیر ارشاد توسط عدهای با شعارهایی در زمینه حجاب @break_new ! سریع، دقیق، بیحاشیه
🥱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @break_new. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آخر خبر” (@break_new), 8,373 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/break_new.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.