Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brecht Zegt (de echte)

Channel

Brecht Zegt (de echte)

@brechtzegt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,325subscribers

-171 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001490626662
TypeChannel
Username@brechtzegt
Created2 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brechtzegt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,32510,49610,410.56 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,490 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,486 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,484 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,479 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,472 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,471 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,470 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,459 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,455 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,449 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,443 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,440 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,438 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,422 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,419 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,416 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,414 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,407 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,406 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,402 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,398 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,392 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,389 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,376 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,363 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,357 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,350 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,343 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,333 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,325 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -171. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,299–10,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:2010,325-8
17 Sept 2026, 06:1610,333-10
15 Sept 2026, 09:5710,343-7
13 Sept 2026, 21:1710,350-7
12 Sept 2026, 05:1510,357-6
9 Sept 2026, 22:0210,363-13
6 Sept 2026, 16:2210,376-13
2 Sept 2026, 16:5510,389-3
1 Sept 2026, 17:0210,392-6
31 Aug 2026, 16:3510,398-4
30 Aug 2026, 15:3910,402-4
29 Aug 2026, 13:1410,406-1
28 Aug 2026, 11:0410,407-7
27 Aug 2026, 10:5510,414-2
26 Aug 2026, 11:3310,416-3
25 Aug 2026, 14:3910,419-3
24 Aug 2026, 15:2810,422-9
22 Aug 2026, 21:5410,431-7
21 Aug 2026, 11:5410,438-2
20 Aug 2026, 09:1210,440first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,556 reactions across 19 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
82953.3%
👍26517.0%
👏16510.6%
🎉875.59%
🙏553.53%
🤣382.44%
😁231.48%
🔥221.41%
🤡181.16%
🍾110.707%
❤‍🔥90.578%
🤔50.321%
🤨50.321%
🥴50.321%
💘30.193%
🤗30.193%
😇20.129%
🤮20.129%
🏆10.064%
🗿10.064%
7 further kinds70.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,556 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈2,710 views76 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Lieve vrienden, Tegenwoordig zijn ze zoveel namaakkanalen actief op TG, dat die alleen opvolgen niet meer mogelijk is. Mag ik daarom jullie hulp vragen? Zouden jullie dit soort kanalen aub regelmatig willen rapporteren? Voorbeelden zijn: https://t.me/BrechtZeegt https://t.me/BrechtZegtchatt Werkwijze: klik of tap op de naam van het kanaal, dan op de knop met de drie stipjes, en kies dan voor het knopje “rapport

👍6115

Signed Brecht Arnaert

11 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈4,090 views62 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Sterk, deze analyse over de rol van The Oracle in The Matrix: in de derde film besefte Neo dat hij onderdeel was van het programma, in die zin dat The Matrix één factor niet kon controleren: hoop. Hoop is wat ons doet projecteren, en als The Matrix het object van hoop zélf programmeert, dan controleer je die variabele, als onderdeel van The Matrix zelf. Wat The Matrix echter niet ingecalculeerd had, was de mogelijk

60👍1🔥1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

26 Jun 2026, 22:27 UTC≈5,870 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @bewustzijnswervelPhoto

Een Scalaire Ode aan de Architectuur van Ontwaken In het stille midden ademt kracht. Geen macht, geen vorm, maar bewustzijn dat zichzelf herkent. Stukken bewegen, maar het veld beweegt méé. Relaties zingen, lijnen lichten op waar waarheid stroomt. De Koning wordt stilte. De Koningin wordt stroom. De Toren wordt waarheid. De Loper wordt inzicht. Het Paard wordt sprong. De Pion wordt mens. En alles alles wordt é

53👍8

Signed Brecht Arnaert

23 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC≈5,700 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Gewaarworden dat we in een hologram leven, het kan bijna een leven lang duren. Geloven dat we dat hologram ook zélf kunnen aansturen, vergt meerdere incarnaties. Wéten dat je in essentie God bént, en dat in deze extensie durven belichamen: waw! Enkel Christus slaagde daar bij mijn weten in. Gerecupereerd door Josephus Flavius. Josephus Flavius = “Paulus” Die vent, die Jesus nooit kende, en plots van zijn paard v

29🔥5👍2🤔2😎1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

20 Jun 2026, 08:36 UTC≈5,490 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

https://t.me/+H9wUq__qlB85NzNi

🤣36🥴5🤡43😁3🤨2🤮2🤯1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

20 Jun 2026, 08:36 UTC≈4,720 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026

OPGEPAST: SCAM Lieve vrienden, De copycats die dingen in mijn naam zeggen worden steeds creatiever: hier gebruikte men een filmpje dat oorspronkelijk over de bewustzijnswervel ging, en daarover is met AI een andere mondbeweging gezet. Dit om te doen alsof ik een bepaalde belegging zou aansmeren. Nu is het nog grappig, omdat de kwaliteit barslecht is. Maar wat voor een probleem wordt dat niet wanneer mijn stem corr

22👍2

Signed Brecht Arnaert

12 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC≈6,640 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

"De wereld staat in brand, de redding is nabij!" 🔥 4 conferenties met P. Daniel Maes — Norbertijn in Syrische woestijn, 15+ jaar in Mar Yakub klooster → maryakub.net 📅 Wanneer: Elke donderdag 20u (BE-tijd): 18/6, 25/6, 2/7, 9/7 💰 Deelname: $20 Stem uit de woestijn IBAN: BE32 0682 0832 4402 / BIC: GKCC BEBB 📲 Inschrijven: WhatsApp naar +963 930 400 849 (vermeld naam + e-mail). Je krijgt dan de Google Meet-link. 🙏

25🙏4🤔1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

10 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC≈5,300 views189 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

En dan nu: FIESTAAAA!!!!

🎉7568👍31🍾11🔥2🤩1🦄1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

10 Jun 2026, 12:35 UTC≈5,410 views256 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Lieve vrienden, Na meer dan 7 jaar is het dan zover. Vandaag kreeg ik mijn officiële investituur als Dr. in de Economische Wetenschap. Opvallend: 90 % van de “intellectuelen” onder de doctorandi zweerden op de Spaanse Constitutie, en niet op wat Spanje groot maakte: het Christelijke geloof. Bedroevend. Ik zwoer op de Bijbel: “Viva Cristo Rey!” En dan nu: fiesta! Dr. Brecht Arnaert

👏13576👍23🎉12🔥7🤗2🏆1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

4 Jun 2026, 14:18 UTC≈5,520 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Het is kalm hier, omdat ik wat van plan ben … ra … ra … ra

👍2317🤔2🗿1

Signed Brecht Arnaert

4 Jun 2026, 05:27 UTC≈5,170 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Hey iedereen, Kennen jullie het Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama? Dit is het soort instituut dat ik ook zou willen in Vlaanderen. Video van 11 minuten, waarin jullie Dr. Jesus Huerta de Soto beter leren kennen, in het Engels: https://youtu.be/5S93w9EBCIw?si=xptt7yhxWi8kgtT9&t=418 Beste groeten, Brecht

19

Signed Brecht Arnaert

31 May 2026, 14:20 UTC≈5,280 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @bewustzijnswervelPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

30

Signed Brecht Arnaert

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brechtzegt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Klokkenluiders 🕊🕊 voor vrijheid 🤜🤛 Nieuws
@klokkenluiders · 39,396
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brecht Zegt (de echte)” (@brechtzegt), 10,325 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brechtzegt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.