Channel
@breynstorm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
357subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001817947994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @breynstorm |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/breynstorm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 357 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 356 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 358 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 362 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 362 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
209 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 180 | 86.1% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 6.70% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 4.31% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 2.39% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2025 to 27 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kubok yaxshi o‘tdi. Yangi bilimdonlar, quvnoq odamlar bilan tanishdim. Ishtirokimdan ham to‘g‘risi qoniqish hosil qildim. G‘oliblikka da‘vogarlar 30 ball yig‘ishdi, menda 29 bo‘ldi. G‘olib bilan ham bir jamoda o‘ynagan ekanman🙂 O‘tgan gal unchalik yaxshi qatnasholmagandim, bu gal deyarli barcha turlarda maksimal olish mumkin bo‘lgan savollar olindi. Yana bir ikkita bor variant o‘tib ketdi. Qatnashuvchilar ham o‘zla…
👍7❤1🔥1
Ertaga “Do‘stlik kubogi” da qatnashishga niyat bor. Hozirgi havaskor bilimdonlarga ham oson bo‘lib qoldi, shu kabi turnirlarda mashhur bilimdonlar bilan o‘ynashi, tajriba almashishi mumkin) O‘zim ham jon deb oddiy ishtirokchi bo‘lib qatnashardim. Lekin, o‘ylab qarasam topdagi juda ko‘p mashhur bilimdonlar bilan o‘ynagan ekanman, eng kamida turli mashg‘ulotlarda. Buyam bir yutuq. Tajribalilar esa jamoaga yangi bilimd…
👍7❤1🔥1
📝 M. Savchenkov chgk da hozirda qanday noto‘g‘ri javoblar(avval qabul qismida bo‘lmagan) qabul qilinayotganligiga misol keltirgan. Bular: 1. Javobdagi realiyaning boshqa nomi Masalan, mexanik uzatmalar qutisi o‘rnida qo‘l uzatmalar qutisi qabul bo‘lgan. https://gotquestions.online/question/418719 2. Savoldagi barcha shartlarga mos keluvchi lekin savol qabul qismida keltirilmagan javob. https://gotquestions.online/q…
👍8
Lekin baribir bunday bo‘lmaydi. Shundan bitta oldingi Kosmik Jekpot haqidagi 26-savolda shu kitobning ikkinchi nomi(savol manbasida ham bor) Goldilocks-tilla soch varianti faktga, formaga mos kelsada qabul bo‘lmagan. Nomni to‘liq yozish kerak edi deb. Lekin aslida shu javob faktga tushmasa ham olinishi kerak edi. Chunki, kosmik jekpot o‘zi goldilocks-златовласка ga asoslangan. Savol mazmuni va formaga mos edi bu jav…
🔥7👍3👎2
📋 Mualliflar kubogidan dastlabki taassurotlar yaxshi, qiziq topilmali savollar ham ko‘p bo‘ldi. Mualliflarga omad. Ammo, ko‘pincha o‘z savollarimga ham beriladigan bitta e'tiroz bor. Bu ham bo‘lsa savol matnlarining uzunligi. Unchalik kerak bo‘lmagan ma'lumotlar qo‘shilgan, yarmiga qisqartirish mumkin bo‘lgan savollar bor edi. Mayli, bu tajriba bilan ham keladigan narsa, muhimi afsuslanadigan o‘yinlar bo‘lmadi. @bre…
👍15👎3
❔Natijalar kech chiqayotganiga navbatchiliklardagi jamoa muhokamalarni qo‘yish ahamiyati ham yo‘qolgandek. Boshqa tomondan balki bu yo‘qdan ko‘ra foydali bo‘lar boshqalarga. Ko‘ramiz, kerakmi o‘zi muhokama? Lekin, apellyatsiyalar haqida yozadigan narsalar bisyor. Ko‘pi, boshqa chatlarda ham yozildi, aytildi. Umuman olganda, Land’s end haqidagi savol apellyatsiyasi qabul bo‘lmagach, endi forma ahamiyati yanada oshib …
👍11❤1
Posted without readable text
👍1
Har mavsumda bir yaxshi bilimdondan ayrilish bizga odat ham bo‘lib qoldi-ku. Bu gal ikki bilimdon jamoani tark etmoqda. Saidakrom aka ham, Mirjalol ham jamoaning chempionligiga katta hissa qo‘shishgan. Ularga albatta keyingi jamoalarda omad tilab, tashakkurlar bildirib qolaman. Biz esa yangi marralar sari yana otlanamiz. Keyingi mavsumda ham maksimal yuqori natija uchun harakat qilamiz. Sodiq Schoolning galaktikos t…
👍9
📝 Bahor-Prof liga 10-tur Yengil kavaleriya navbatchiligi So‘nggi va muhim o‘yin oldidan biroz bosim bor edi. Shunga qaramay turlar davomida nisbatan xotirjam o‘ynay oldik. Birinchi savolda M. Ulug‘bek, Farg‘oniy kabi variantlar ham bor edi. Arena joylashgan joydan kelib chiqib yakunda Beruniyni tanladik. Hermes haqidagi savolni endigina o‘yinga kelib qo‘shilgan Saidakrom aka topdilar. Dupletda esa birinchi savolga …
👍11❤1
📝 Bahor-Prof liga 9-tur Magnum navbatchiligi Bu navbatchilikning jamoamiz ishtirokidagi jonli tahlili hali “Tahlil” da ham namoyish qilinadi. Lekin unda kesiladigan joylar ko‘p bo‘lsa kerak, shunga ba'zi jihatlarni doimgidek yoritib ketsam. Qul haqidagi savolda dastlab bu variant kelganda Abbos darhol Qur’onda shunday kelishini “ayting” degan ma'nosi borligini aytdi. Boshqa tuzukroq variant chiqmadi va shuni berdik…
👍9
📝 Ba’zida o‘yin hay’ati yoki AH tomonidan to‘g‘ri javob sifatida qabul qilingan, zachetga qo‘shilgan ba'zi qarorlar g‘alati ko‘rinadi. Quyidagi maqolada esa yirik rus chgk turnirlardagi shunday qabullar haqida gap borgan. Umuman bugungi kunda to‘g‘ri javobga mos bo‘lmagan, savol formasiga to‘g‘ri kelmaydigan va muallif podskazkalariga mos kelmaydigan javoblar ham to‘g‘ri javob sifatida qabul qilinishiga misollar ko‘…
👍2
📝 Bahor-Prof liga 6-tur Renessans navbatchiligi Ko‘p savollarda boshidanoq javoblarni topa oldik. Kotta bolla haqidagi savolda Jentraga bog‘liqligini sezdik, Mirjalol jentrifikatsiya borligini aytib qoldi. Viktoriya guli haqidagi savolda esa Rafleziya-Arnoldiga chalg‘idik. Vaholanki, savolda o‘zi kashfiyotchi aytilgandi ham, shunisiga e'tibor bermabmiz. Mamont haqidagi savolda esa turli hayvonlarga o‘xshatolmay turg…
👍7🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @breynstorm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Breynstorm” (@breynstorm), 357 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breynstorm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.