Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GET VERIFIED 🙏🏽

Channel

GET VERIFIED 🙏🏽

@briIIiance

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

799subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002429342937
TypeChannel
Username@briIIiance
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/briIIiance

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@briIIiance/2880 · this entry27 Jan 2026, 08:23 UTC@getverifedby/81527 Jan 2026, 08:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@briIIiance/2882 · this entry4 Feb 2026, 22:04 UTC@getverifedby/8174 Feb 2026, 22:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@briIIiance/2884 · this entry18 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC@getverifedby/82018 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@briIIiance/2892 · this entry17 May 2026, 04:46 UTC@getverifedby/82817 May 2026, 04:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@getverifedby/8355 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC@briIIiance/2896 · this entry5 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@getverifedby5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@getverifedby (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 August 2025 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @getverifedby. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7777997886 August 2026 — 777 subscribers6 August 2026 — 777 subscribers12 August 2026 — 788 subscribers19 August 2026 — 792 subscribers25 August 2026 — 789 subscribers1 September 2026 — 799 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 26 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 774–802 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 05:55799+10
25 Aug 2026, 14:11789-3
19 Aug 2026, 01:44792+4
12 Aug 2026, 16:14788+11
6 Aug 2026, 15:37777no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:05777first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 04:18 UTC113 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Snapchat Verification Service Can do ALL accounts. English speaking accounts are best. STRONG BUDGET ONLY Join @briIIiance for verification. 📥 @grateful

13 Jul 2026, 02:30 UTC193 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Instant Unbans are on Fiyah! Successfully done over 5 cases today. Let's print. 📥 @grateful

5 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC268 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Verified Tiktok with 1.8M Followers BIN 4K Username and Display Name are Changeable. Account is Viral and Hyperactive. 📥 @grateful

17 May 2026, 04:46 UTC553 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅ Instagram Legacy Verification Service We are able to provide both business and Creator Legacy Verification. Higher visibility + More security to avoid bans to protect your account. Cases are usually 14 day TAT for solid cases. 📥 @grateful

2 May 2026, 22:30 UTC526 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Snapchat Verification Service Can do ALL accounts. English speaking accounts are best. STRONG BUDGET ONLY Join @briIIiance for verification. 📥 @grateful

20 Apr 2026, 02:57 UTC559 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Verified Snap Just Dropped! Niche: None Demo: Non USA Followers: 20K BIN - STRONG BUDGET ONLY Has payout option enabled. Changeable display name and PFP only. Join @briIIiance for Verification 📥 @grateful

14 Apr 2026, 01:52 UTC590 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Near Instant Snapchat Verification Service Can do ALL accounts. English speaking accounts are best. No Reqs. Cases can be as long as 0-7 day TAT for solid cases. STRONG BUDGET ONLY Join @briIIiance for verification. 📥 @grateful

7 Apr 2026, 21:47 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Verification is Live Strong Budgets Only 0-7 Day TAT. No Press Required. Can do your CURRENT account. Make sure you join @briIIiance for verification today. 📥 @grateful

11 Mar 2026, 02:25 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Verified Snap Just Dropped! Niche: None Demo: USA Followers: 60K BIN - STRONG BUDGET ONLY Has payout option enabled. Changeable display name and PFP only. Join @briIIiance for Verification 📥 @grateful

18 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC720 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅ Instagram Legacy Verification Service We are able to provide both business and Creator Legacy Verification. Higher visibility + More security to avoid bans to protect your account. BIN - 9K + Cases are usually 7 day TAT for solid cases. 📥 @grateful

4 Feb 2026, 22:04 UTC557 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Twitch Verification / Partner Service We are able to do claims after accounts have been verified as a separate service. BIN - 1.5K + Cases are usually 7 day TAT for solid cases. 📥 @grateful

3 Feb 2026, 19:49 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱 Near Instant Snapchat Verification Service Can do ALL niche USA accounts. English speaking accounts. Must be a creator with some following. Cases can be as long as 10 day TAT for solid cases. Join @briIIiance for verification. 📥 @grateful

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @briIIiance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GET VERIFIED 🙏🏽” (@briIIiance), 799 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/briIIiance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.