Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BRM

Channel

BRM

@brm_game

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,257subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001637052087
TypeChannel
Username@brm_game
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brm_game

Growth

17,19617,29017,2437 August 2026 — 17,290 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,288 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,287 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,283 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,284 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,275 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,273 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,278 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,273 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,262 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,256 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,257 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,255 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,253 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,247 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,241 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,229 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,220 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,212 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,214 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,210 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,203 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,196 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,199 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,224 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,257 subscribers17,2577 August 20263 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 27 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,182–17,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:4217,257+33
2 Sept 2026, 02:3417,224+25
1 Sept 2026, 01:1617,199+3
30 Aug 2026, 21:4817,196-7
29 Aug 2026, 23:0917,203-7
29 Aug 2026, 01:0417,210-4
28 Aug 2026, 04:2517,214+2
27 Aug 2026, 06:4417,212-8
26 Aug 2026, 03:0817,220-9
24 Aug 2026, 23:5517,229-12
23 Aug 2026, 14:0817,241-6
22 Aug 2026, 01:4517,247-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:5317,253-2
19 Aug 2026, 17:4817,255-2
18 Aug 2026, 20:4717,257+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:3917,256-6
16 Aug 2026, 21:1617,262-11
15 Aug 2026, 09:2317,273-5
13 Aug 2026, 23:3617,278+5
12 Aug 2026, 15:2617,273first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 17,257 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,840
88 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held105 (30 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total426,180
Reactions total14,879
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,934 reactions across 101 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53574728670784099154,28725.3%
custom 52153064173338850022,73716.2%
2,11512.5%
🔥1,5479.14%
😁1,3638.05%
🤣8845.22%
❤‍🔥5983.53%
💯3992.36%
🍌3872.29%
custom 52355379681558959293642.15%
👀2461.45%
custom 52356848775122531382451.45%
😍2001.18%
🤪1861.10%
🤡1791.06%
custom 52356518320338800801420.839%
🗿1380.815%
🌭1280.756%
🍾1150.679%
🍓910.537%
39 further kinds5833.44%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,934 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 101 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brm_game. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:10 UTC≈1,770 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 523568487751225313845custom 523553796815589592921custom 5235651832033880080137custom 535747286707840991521🍌1👾1

3 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC≈2,460 views164 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Перевернул?

custom 5357472867078409915100custom 52153064173338850023016custom 52356848775122531389🐳2💯2🤬2custom 52355379681558959292

2 Sept 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,840 views198 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @DariaOstroPhoto

Стильный вечер, море музыки, красивые мы с Майей и телефоны за миллион рублей в restore:

custom 5235537968155895929118custom 523565183203388008039custom 535747286707840991517🔥84😍4custom 52153064173338850023🐳2

2 Sept 2026, 05:13 UTC≈3,660 views123 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6515custom 521530641733388500210custom 52356848775122531388custom 52356518320338800807custom 52355379681558959296🍌4😍3

1 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈3,900 views232 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ОСЕННИЙ СЕЗОН НА ТЕРРИТОРИИ ХАРДКОРА МОЖНО СЧИТАТЬ ОТКРЫТЫМ! 🤗

131custom 523553796815589592956custom 523568487751225313819❤‍🔥7🍌5👍4🌭3🍓2

1 Sept 2026, 07:41 UTC≈4,120 views144 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 523553796815589592973custom 523565183203388008026custom 523568487751225313817custom 535747286707840991511custom 52153064173338850026🍌3💋3🤪3

1 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC≈4,200 views236 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Бодрого сентября, чат! Отпустишь меня на пару часов? А потом сразу пойдем добивать Resonance: A Plague Tale Legacy. И нет, мне не надо на школьную линейку! 🤜

custom 5235684877512253138120custom 523553796815589592956custom 523565183203388008039custom 535747286707840991517🤪2🤬2

31 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈4,190 views140 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Курица не выживет одна в открытом космосе! А ты..? 🙂 Проверим вместе, ведь канал BRM разыгрывает 5 ключей Steam-версии игры Breathedge 2 от российской студии RedRuins Softworks. Продолжение культовой комедийной space-survival игры уже в релизе! Снова в скафандре, снова среди обломков, снова с чувством юмора на грани выживания. Космос не стал добрее, но стал смешнее! Условия участия: ⦁ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА BRM ⦁ БЕРЕЧЬ

71custom 523553796815589592932🔥15custom 523565183203388008010custom 52356848775122531386🐳3🤪2👍1

31 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈3,950 views236 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Эрнест Хемингуэй поспорил, что сможет написать самый короткий рассказ, который растрогает любого… А потом чат попросил подержать пиво.

custom 5357472867078409915120🤣74❤‍🔥13custom 52356518320338800807💯6custom 52356848775122531384🤪3🫡3

31 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈4,000 views109 reactionsread 3 September 2026

А забустим TG? 🤜 Хочу новых и крутых реакций нам добавить на посты. Тебе понравятся! 👵

custom 535747286707840991558custom 521530641733388500220custom 523568487751225313815custom 52355050730013741539🤪3❤‍🔥2🐳1🤯1

31 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈3,910 views238 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А как тебе DLSS 5? 🤗 ❌ LIVE to

🔥123🤣45custom 535747286707840991529😁22custom 521530641733388500265❤‍🔥3🤪2

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @brm_game. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cake's stream page
@cakestreampage · 35,258
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Стримы Куплинова
@Kuplinov_Alerts · 62,542
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
WELOVEGAMES
@welovegames · 51,436
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Игровой Канал Блэка [BlackUFA] 🎮
@blackufa_official · 52,388
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Alina Rin 🐟
@welcome2RHK · 60,413
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BRM” (@brm_game), 17,257 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brm_game.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.