Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net +1,891. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,839–19,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 12:37
17,899
-263
6 Sept 2026, 07:16
18,162
-230
4 Sept 2026, 02:54
18,392
-142
2 Sept 2026, 19:23
18,534
-192
1 Sept 2026, 17:53
18,726
+893
31 Aug 2026, 15:15
17,833
+922
30 Aug 2026, 14:57
16,911
-37
29 Aug 2026, 16:15
16,948
-109
28 Aug 2026, 13:12
17,057
-44
27 Aug 2026, 16:07
17,101
-78
26 Aug 2026, 16:24
17,179
-106
25 Aug 2026, 16:04
17,285
-137
24 Aug 2026, 14:48
17,422
-168
22 Aug 2026, 19:15
17,590
-199
21 Aug 2026, 09:54
17,789
-136
20 Aug 2026, 11:34
17,925
-208
19 Aug 2026, 12:46
18,133
-150
18 Aug 2026, 15:42
18,283
+1,167
17 Aug 2026, 17:48
17,116
+1,770
16 Aug 2026, 15:54
15,346
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 17,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,880
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
38 (29 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
152,770
Reactions total
4,674
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 51s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,596 reactions across 38 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,596
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,596 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.63%
1 of 38 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,440
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,760
over 37 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxH1hbq
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Почему я только сейчас узнала о существовании этого масла для губ от KIKO?! 🥹✨
Вы только посмотрите на эти блёстки — нереально красиво переливаются, особенно на свету. Хочется рассматривать бесконечно))
Единственный момент — аромат довольно специфичный и точно на любителя. Но за такой блеск я готова ему это простить 🤌🏻✨
Мой топ масок для лица 🔥
Из гидрогелевых мой абсолютный фаворит — VT. Они идеально ложатся на лицо, хорошо увлажняют и питают кожу 🤌
Ещё очень нравятся маски iWOWWE — о них я вообще узнала случайно благодаря разным бьюти-боксам, и в итоге они прочно поселились в моём уходе.
Из тканевых мои любимчики — Celimax, Dr. Oracle, Rovectin и JMsolution ❤️
Вообще маски для лица — тот этап ухода, который я никогда не пропущу…
Возвращаемся в это местечко, когда хочется вкусной грузинской кухни, большого выбора блюд и того самого сервиса, после которого хочется прийти ещё раз❤️🔥
Отдельная любовь здесь — десерты! Хинкали с нутеллой и профитроли с мороженым в бельгийском шоколаде — это просто балдеееж🤌🏻 Обязательно оставляйте для них место!
А ещё я сыграла с официантом в кости и выиграла дополнительный десерт — ну разве не идеальное заверш…
У меня тут случился небольшой карьерный поворот 😁
На ближайшую неделю я становлюсь редактором телеграм-канала AEVIT.
Поэтому ближайшие семь дней там будет мой небольшой дневник: буду делиться своим уходом, привычками и маленькими секретами, которые помогают мне заботиться о коже
В общем, если хотите неделю пожить со мной ещё и в чужом канале — я теперь здесь
Пошла исполнять обязанности редактора 🫡
Пока шёл дождь, зашла в «Улыбку радуги» переждать и, конечно, просто постоять в сторонке не получилось 😁
И спустя весь хайп (каких-то два года) всё-таки добралась до Solzao — взяла гель для душа и крем для рук. Ароматы, конечно, пушка-бомба 🤌🏻 Из гелей больше всего понравились карамельный и вишнёвый, а вот остальные для меня пахнут немного химозно.
В общем, просто зашла переждать дождь… ну вы поняли 😂
Weekend randoms 🩵🤌🏻
— Покатались на паровозике, это наш любимый аттракцион 😁
— Съездили в ТЦ за детские вещами и заодно вкусно поужинали
— Поймали по дороге какой-то нереальный закат… невозможно было не остановиться и не сфотографировать 🌸
— И немного красивых деталей вокруг, которые всегда хочется сохранить в галерею 🤍
Люблю такие обычные семейные дни без особых планов 🫶
У меня есть два любимых типа масок для лица: гидрогелевые и глиняные 🤍
Гидрогелевые люблю за ощущение увлажнённой и напитанной кожи, а глиняные — за то, какой кожа становится после. Такая мягкая, гладкая и очень приятная на ощупь.
Сейчас как раз тестирую глиняную маску от YBK 🌿 и первые впечатления очень приятные.
А вы какие больше любите — гидрогелевые или глиняные?
Отличное завершение дня: доставка суши из «Важной рыбы» и «Лучше звоните Солу»🍣
Кстати, просьба сильно не завидовать — я тот самый человек, который только сейчас впервые посмотрел «Во все тяжкие» и «Лучше звоните Солу» 😂
Проверяю нашумевший BB-крем от Dr. Oracle на коже с высыпаниями 👀
Потому что одно дело — идеальная кожа в рекламе, и совсем другое — реальная жизнь.
Спойлер: результат меня очень удивил. Кажется, я поняла, откуда столько шума вокруг этого BB 🤍
Сегодня устроила небольшой день заботы о себе🤍
Сначала отправилась на уход для лица Reviderm — хотелось успокоить кожу и убрать покраснения после моего неудачного эксперимента с фиксатором макияжа от belor design, на который вышла аллергия🥲
А ещё наконец-то привела свои руки в порядок и сделала маникюр с покрытием.
Отдельно хочется сказать про само пространство — здесь невероятно красивый и эстетичный интерьер, вс…
❤198
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @browstella. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БЬЮТИ МАГНАТ” (@browstella), 17,899 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/browstella.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.