Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fin CryptoAce

Channel

Fin CryptoAce

@brutalBitcoin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,552subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002128339053
TypeChannel
Username@brutalBitcoin
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brutalBitcoin

Growth

1,5521,5621,5571 September 2026 — 1,562 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,562 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,560 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,556 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,552 subscribers1 September 202612 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,551–1,564 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 00:011,552-4
7 Sept 2026, 12:011,556-4
2 Sept 2026, 12:141,560-2
1 Sept 2026, 21:001,562no change
1 Sept 2026, 20:451,562first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

398 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16641.7%
👍7719.3%
🔥5112.8%
👀225.53%
👏174.27%
😱164.02%
🕊92.26%
😁71.76%
💔61.51%
💋51.26%
😴41.01%
🐳30.754%
🤯30.754%
20.503%
🎃20.503%
😈20.503%
🤝20.503%
🥱20.503%
👨‍💻10.251%
🙏10.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2025 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 13:55 UTC≈2,330 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026

https://x.com/Fin_CryptoAce/status/1962876767644823834?t=8xV9UoKYaJePA_YBbDrF1Q&s=19

👍43👀2🥱1

27 Feb 2025, 18:27 UTC≈6,250 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoculttradingPhoto

IS ALT SEASON DEAD?|ALTs WILL NEVER BOUNCE NOW?|BULL MARKET IS OVER FOR ALTs ?| https://youtu.be/sjRDVr4dWyQ

7😁6👍42🎃2

18 Feb 2025, 09:56 UTC≈7,420 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/-14y4UoOlGg?si=9dm2adsZdR-i-AaP

🔥71

17 Feb 2025, 15:53 UTC≈5,690 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

https://www.youtube.com/live/6aUYgCpDDiA?si=dMRTg8mWupYc3I4r

👍3

17 Feb 2025, 14:28 UTC≈4,940 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoculttradingPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

23🔥6💔2👍1

17 Feb 2025, 10:04 UTC≈5,040 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026

https://x.com/saniya_near/status/1891428034164474048?s=46

🔥4👍2😴1

17 Feb 2025, 07:22 UTC≈3,070 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoculttradingPhoto

BITCOIN ANALYSIS PART 10|ALTs UPDATE|NEW TRADES IN MARKET https://youtu.be/bvs7BGyadq8

👍11🔥21

5 Feb 2025, 04:11 UTC≈4,250 views19 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoculttradingPhoto

HOW TO MANAGE MULTIPLE POSITIONS IN CASE OF CRASH?|HOW TO USE HARD SL?|WAYS TO MANAGE MULTIPLE TRADE https://youtu.be/6DHlRaVqhBE

👏13👍5💋1

31 Jan 2025, 10:47 UTC≈4,280 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoculttradingPhoto

BTC SIDEWAYS WHAT’S NEXT ?|MARKET UPDATES|10k$ TO 50k$ CHALLENGE UPDATE|ALTCOINS IN BUYING ZONE https://youtu.be/ivQHcgAmt8Q

8👏3🤯3👍2🥱1

31 Jan 2025, 05:04 UTC≈3,480 views28 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoculttrading

Balance $771

👀208

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brutalBitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Jargon
@cryptojargon69 · 36,038
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fin CryptoAce” (@brutalBitcoin), 1,552 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brutalBitcoin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.