Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Обучение ТОС с Брызгаловой

Channel

Обучение ТОС с Брызгаловой

@bryzgalova_o

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

379subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002264576542
TypeChannel
Username@bryzgalova_o
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bryzgalova_o

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

366379372.56 August 2026 — 366 subscribers6 August 2026 — 366 subscribers28 August 2026 — 367 subscribers6 September 2026 — 369 subscribers14 September 2026 — 379 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 364–381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 05:16379+10
6 Sept 2026, 11:40369+2
28 Aug 2026, 20:28367+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:01366no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:37366first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6754.9%
👍3226.2%
❤2318.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC291 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Открыта регистрация на офлайн-обучение основам мыслительных интсрументов ТОС, которое пройдёт 22-23 августа, с 10 до 19 МСК. https://forms.gle/h6C79umYv7qJceGB6

👍1

20 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC489 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📅 22–23 августа в Москве пройдёт офлайн-обучение по базовым мыслительным процессам: Туча, НЖЯ, Негативная ветка. 🔗 Подробности по ссылке: (ссылка) ⚠️ Регистрация стартует в ПН 27 июля в 10:00 по МСК. 📩 Как будет проходить регистрация? 27.07.2026 в 10:00 МСК здесь появится ссылка для регистрации. ☁️Для регистрации нужно будет указать только свой ник в Telegram. ☁️Места будут распределяться в порядке регистрации. ☁…

🔥9❤3👍1

6 May 2026, 05:01 UTC748 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Привет! Готовы учиться офлайн летом?

  1. Июнь - Питер14%
  2. Июль - Питер24%
  3. Август - Питер32%
  4. Июнь - Москва25%
  5. Июль - Москва34%
  6. Август - Москва42%

The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,120 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Открыта регистрация на офлайн-обучение основам мыслительных интсрументов ТОС, которое пройдёт 21-22 марта, с 10 до 19 МСК. https://forms.gle/yDWT8xxTA1W4RPc16 UPD. Места кончились

🔥4

5 Feb 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всем привет! Места в группу 11 февраля закончились, сделала вторую группу на 26 февраля. Там осталось 2 места. Можно писать по той же ссылке. UPD. Места закончились

4 Feb 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,020 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Открыта регистрация на онлайн-обучение по НЖЯ, которое пройдёт 11 февраля, в среду с 10 до 13 МСК. https://forms.gle/MzPHPUrfQjqRQp8V9

👍4

4 Feb 2026, 05:41 UTC853 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📅 21–22 марта в Москве пройдёт офлайн-обучение по базовым мыслительным процессам: Туча, НЖЯ, Негативная ветка. 🔗 Подробности по ссылке: (ссылка) ⚠️ Регистрация стартует в ПН 09 февраля в 10:00 по МСК. 📩 Как будет проходить регистрация? 09.02.2025 в 10:00 МСК здесь появится ссылка для регистрации. ☁️Для регистрации нужно будет указать только свой ник в Telegram. ☁️Места будут распределяться в порядке регистрации. …

🔥5❤3👍1

2 Feb 2026, 05:37 UTC772 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Приём!🖖 Первый онлайн в этом году будет 11.02.26. Про НЖЯ. НЖЯ - это формулировка сути. Так же необходимый навык, в том числе для построения ТУЧИ) НЖЯ — это способ зафиксировать проблему так, чтобы с ней вообще можно было работать. Не как мнение, не как оценку и не как «что-то идёт не так», а как наблюдаемое нежелательное явление, которое имеет последствия и повторяется. Большинство обсуждений начинается слишком ра…

🔥6❤5👍3

29 Nov 2025, 07:26 UTC960 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всем привет! Группа на 03.12.25 набралась, но так как заявок было заметно больше, то я решила сделать еще один день и следом почти набралась группа на 11.12.25. В неё есть еще 3 места. Кто хочет запишитесь, пожалуйста, сюда https://forms.gle/PviGPYLD3kUefrGD7 UPD. Места закончились

28 Nov 2025, 07:02 UTC888 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Открыта регистрация на онлайн-обучение по негативной ветке, которое пройдёт 03 декабря, в среду с 10 до 13 МСК. https://forms.gle/PDbkB2HUgHJZjvqK7

👍4🔥3

26 Nov 2025, 05:27 UTC≈1,070 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Приём!🖖 Онлайну в этом году быть. 03.12.25. Начнём с негативной ветки. Некоторые онлайн-потоки у нас тоже начинались с негативной ветки, потому что это частный вид логической цепочки. А логическая цепочка — это базовая база 🙂 По задумке, негативная ветвь — это инструмент, направленный на отсечение негативных последствий. Когда вроде бы есть решение, но у нас или у людей, от которых нам нужно получить согласие и подд…

🔥14❤6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bryzgalova_o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 May 2026, 05:01 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

Привет! Готовы учиться офлайн летом?

  1. Июнь - Питер14%
  2. Июль - Питер24%
  3. Август - Питер32%
  4. Июнь - Москва25%
  5. Июль - Москва34%
  6. Август - Москва42%

The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Sept 2025, 14:58 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

что первое (в середине октярбя)

  1. ТУЧА45%
  2. НЖЯ35%
  3. Негативная ветвь26%
  4. Дерево препятствий23%
  5. Шесть слоёв сопротивления29%

The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Обучение ТОС с Брызгаловой” (@bryzgalova_o), 379 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bryzgalova_o.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.