NIGHT, BABIES! Passando pra informar que migrei de conta por motivos de: perdi acesso a esse número. Então, quem ainda tiver esperança em mim e quiser manter contato, me chama pela @xbubbleboo 🤍
Signed Booboo

Channel
@bubblenotes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001756594504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bubblenotes |
| Description | Delírios, sonhos e esboços. Algumas loucuras e frivolidades que nublam minha mente. Bem-vinde, sweetie. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 6 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bubblenotes |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
NIGHT, BABIES! Passando pra informar que migrei de conta por motivos de: perdi acesso a esse número. Então, quem ainda tiver esperança em mim e quiser manter contato, me chama pela @xbubbleboo 🤍
Signed Booboo
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Booboo
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ 𝙻𝗈𝗏𝖾 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 𝙸𝗇 ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ 𝙿𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌. ⠀⠀⠀⠀
Signed Booboo
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Booboo
Chega, vou dropar Yuumi’s Cell pois não tenho emocional pra lidar com Park Jinyoung atuando.
Signed Booboo
Cada take do Jinyoung como Yoo Babi é como um murro no meio da minha cara
Signed Booboo
Yumi sua desgraçada sortuda, nunca colapsei de tanta inveja na minha vida
Signed Booboo
/grita fino
Signed Booboo
NÃO MEUS AMORES
Signed Booboo
MEU DEUS O BABI
Signed Booboo
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Booboo
Odeio tudo e todos!
Signed Booboo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bubblenotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,191,092 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bubblenotes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“— BOO’𝘀 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗗” (@bubblenotes). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bubblenotes.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.