Channel
@budka_Aelity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003711899419 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @budka_Aelity |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/budka_Aelity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 35 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 34 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 33 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 33 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 59.0% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 35.9% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что-то я разогналась 😅 Так как половина страницы была пустая, я решила прилепить сюда глаз (не, ну а чо, пустоту что ли оставить?) мне нравиться как вышел скетч, остался покрас и рендер 😰 Если что, раскрашивать я буду карандашами, так как тут слишком много мелких деталей и маркерами я все испорчу #скетч #традишка
🔥1
Всем привет:3 Я уже нарисовала позу для арта (перс будет, которого в комменты скидывали) и начала рисовать одежду, давно хотела нарисовать кого-то в этой позе, уж больно она мне нравится ^^ #скетч
❤1🍓1🔥1
Вот ещё версия без очков (что бы можно было нормально разглядеть, что я намудрила с глазом)
🔥1
Ещё один тест лассо уже на Риз, мне нравится так рисовать, довольно классно #диджитал #Лофд
🔥1
Решила научится пользоваться лассо, вроде норм вышло (Разумеется пробовала на Лопушке, а вы как хотели?) #Лофд #диджитал
❤3🔥1
2 мини анимка за день, рекорд^^ (типо голова с разных ракурсов, кто понял тот понял) на нее я уже потратила 45 минут, а не 14, вроде лучше выглядит, но хз (ракурсы головы срисовывала с референса, сама я пока что не очень разбираюсь в этом) #анимация
❤1
Сделала мини анимку типо поворота головы, какая-то фигня вышла если честно:/ #анимация
❤2
Всем привет, сегодня я была у репетитора на рисовании и успела нарисовать целых 3 позы за занятие! Я сама хз, как получилось, учитывая то, что одну из поз я перерисовывала полностью 2 раза, как по мне, вышло довольно хорошо, по крайней мере, динамику получилось передать #традишка #скетч
❤1
Ребят, покидайте разных персонажей которых я могу порисовать, (именно фото) Королера постараюсь дорисовать на этой недели, просто нет желания его рисовать. (Можно из любых фд или игр)
❤3
Всем привет, Королера не было желания рисовать, но зато я сделала такую мини анимацию с глазиком:3 (такую «кисть» сделала по тутору из ютуба) Как вам? Буду рада почитать комменты^^ #анимация
❤2🔥1
Ещё я попробовала нарисовать динамичную позу, но вышла откровенная фигня:/ #порисульки #скетч #традишка
❤1🔥1
Привет всем, я решила попробовать нарисовать руки не методом варежки (кто понял, тот понял) а методом осей и кружков, каким я рисую разные позы Вроде норм вышло, а вроде и фигня #скетч #традишка #порисульки
❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @budka_Aelity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что мне ещё порисовать?
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Творческая будка Аэлиты” (@budka_Aelity), 35 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/budka_Aelity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.