File, posted without a caption
❤4🔥2

Channel
@bugbountyresources
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,156subscribers
+146 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001549967532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bugbountyresources |
| Description | Bugbounty Resources • Tips • Security Zines • Writeups • Vulnerability Update • Notes • Mindmaps • Cheatsheets • Checklists • Article / Blogs • PDFs • ebooks • |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bugbountyresources |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 12,156 | +15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 12,141 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 12,130 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 12,118 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 12,114 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 12,109 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 12,102 | +33 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 12,069 | +14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:49 | 12,055 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 12,049 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 12,039 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 12,032 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 12,026 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 12,016 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 12,010 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 12,010 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (1 December 2025 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,335 |
| Reactions total | 144 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
290 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 130 | 44.8% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 20.0% | |
| 🤡 | 38 | 13.1% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 12.4% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 4.14% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 3.10% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.345% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
❤4🔥2
https://medium.com/@dhanoagagan2533/my-first-accepted-security-report-on-darkbytesolutions-com-2571871868eb?postPublishedType=initial
❤5🥰1
IP Spoofing to Account Takeover Leveraging IP spoofing to achieve one-click account takeover in OAuth • Blog: https://blog.mirzadzare.net/ip-spoofing-to-account-takeover
👍6❤2
Posted without readable text
🤡4❤2
Starting Claude For Bug Bounty - # Series I’m starting from absolute zero and showing beginners how to actually use Claude for: → Recon → Burp Suite → API testing → XSS → IDOR → JS analysis → Finding bugs → Writing solid reports I’ll show what Claude is doing, why it works, and how to verify the findings yourself. first part coming soon. 👀
🔥18❤8👍6🤡1
🚨 FREE DeepSeek V4 Flash for Bug Bounty! Try hunting for bugs that are getting found a lot right now: → IDOR / BOLA → Auth bypass → SSRF → Race conditions → Business logic bugs → XSS Give it a target, build hypotheses, and see if it can find something you might miss. It’s free, so worth testing. 👉 Sign up here: Freebuff If you find an interesting bug with it, share the result on X 🔥
🔥11🤨3👍2❤1🤡1
→ 100 Web Vulnerabilities, categorized into various types : + Injection Vulnerabilities: 1. SQL Injection (SQLi) 2. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) 3. Cross-Site Request Forgery (CRF) 4. Remote Code Execution (RCE) 5. Command Injection 6. XML Injection 7. LDAP Injection 8. XPath Injection 9. HTML Injection 10. Server-Side Includes (SSI) Injection 11. OS Command Injection 12. Blind SQL Injection 13. Server-Side Template I…
❤14🤡1
Read “RCE in 2026 Doesn’t Look Like RCE in 2020. Here’s What Actually Matters Now.“ https://medium.com/@Aacle/rce-in-2026-doesnt-look-like-rce-in-2020-here-s-what-actually-matters-now-fedb5bee2c86
❤4🤡1
Shubs spent 40+ hours understanding one company's attack surface before testing anything. NahamSec found a critical SSRF through an expense report PDF generator nobody else looked at. The difference is not skill. It is where you look. 7 surfaces: https://medium.com/@Aacle/most-hunters-test-the-same-surface-as-everyone-else-c6512bfc66de?sk=aea57ad2b25592b67d7e9c2785e003d5
❤6🤡2👍1
Subdomain takeover: dig +short CNAME http://sub.target.com Points to: http://herokuapp.com → claim the app http://cloudfront.net → claim the distribution http://github.io → create the repo http://s3.amazonaws.com → claim the bucket Service gone, DNS still pointing = takeover.
❤7👏2👍1🤡1
OAuth HPP test: send two redirect_uri parameters. ?redirect_uri=https://app.com&redirect_uri=https://evil.com If server validates the first and uses the last, the token goes to http://evil.com. Validate first, use last. Source: Twitter/Digits #114169.
🔥4❤2👍1🤡1
SAML bypass test: craft a SAML response with an arbitrary username and admin role. Leave out the Signature element entirely. Some plugins skip signature verification when the element is empty. If the server provisions the user, you have admin. Source: Uber #136169 ($10,000).
🥰4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @bugbountyresources. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bug Bounty” (@bugbountyresources), 12,156 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bugbountyresources.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.