Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fuck for VIP

Channel

Fuck for VIP

@bugccx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

41,701subscribers

+1,437 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677839188
TypeChannel
Username@bugccx
Created16 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bugccx

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

40,26241,70140,981.57 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,437. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,046–41,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 03:4941,701+11
4 Nov 2026, 23:0841,690+5
4 Nov 2026, 00:1741,685-1
2 Nov 2026, 22:0841,686+6
1 Nov 2026, 18:4941,680+3
31 Oct 2026, 15:2841,677+19
30 Oct 2026, 15:5741,658+4
29 Oct 2026, 14:0741,654+11
28 Oct 2026, 12:4841,643+6
27 Oct 2026, 14:3141,637+1
26 Oct 2026, 15:2641,636+13
25 Oct 2026, 16:5141,623+89
24 Oct 2026, 17:5741,534+23
23 Oct 2026, 19:0041,511-1
22 Oct 2026, 17:4641,512+1
21 Oct 2026, 16:0141,511+16
20 Oct 2026, 10:0741,495+14
19 Oct 2026, 12:1541,481+9
18 Oct 2026, 11:4041,472+7
17 Oct 2026, 11:1641,465first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 16 August 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 176 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,739 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,71845.9%
🐳72119.3%
🌭52814.1%
🍓2045.46%
🎉2025.40%
🌚1183.16%
🍌1183.16%
👻942.51%
🤨180.481%
😐80.214%
❤70.187%
🎃30.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,739 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2023 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 13 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bugccx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 August 2023 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 02:34 UTC≈5,310 views37 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Forwarded from @LotusXposedFile

小红书: - 重构 无水印下载Plus (长按任意信息流中的笔记,面板顶部注入下载按钮。无需再「分享 → 复制链接」) - 新增 隐藏评论区搜索框 - 新增 聊天语音替换 - 新增 评论语音替换

🌚26😁11

Signed Neko33

24 Sept 2026, 02:34 UTC≈5,680 views16 reactionsread 25 September 2026

来玩呀(〜¯▽¯)〜

🍌15🐳1

Signed Neko33

7 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC≈42,700 views604 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
File

明年见

😁439🐳61🍌34🍓23🌚21🌭16👻10

Signed Neko33

5 Sept 2026, 12:27 UTC≈7,620 views210 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

新版简单预览😌

😁184👻15🍓7🐳4

4 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC≈9,770 views114 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

少来恶心人好吧🤢,还有那些问东问西记者也别来恶心人,赞助是自愿的到后面又让别人退款真有意思。。。下次碰到这种人,钱归我了人就拉黑了真是吃到💩了

😁95🌚8👻7🍌4

27 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC≈38,900 views242 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

适配102啦😶‍🌫️

😁221🌚8🐳6🍓5🍌1👻1

28 Jun 2026, 15:21 UTC≈98,200 views511 reactions4 Starsread 6 November 2026
File

下次见🥳

🐳434🍓29😁17🍌9🌚8🌭7👻7

Signed Neko33

24 Apr 2026, 18:58 UTC≈143,000 views606 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

接下来不看频道消息就这用不了那用不了的人,你将会被踢出群聊。 另外所有的适配软件在内测群都有发

🌭460😁75🍓20👻16🐳15🍌13🌚7

22 Apr 2026, 11:15 UTC≈110,000 views447 reactionsread 7 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

😁373🐳39🍌12🌭11👻6🍓5🌚1

Signed Neko33

26 Feb 2026, 09:48 UTC≈155,000 views163 reactionsread 6 November 2026

小提示: 如果部分应用在 Hook 后闪退无法启动,可以这样解决: 更新新版 LSPosed → 打开 LSPosed → 设置 → 还原内联钩子 → 勾选打不开的应用 → 重启应用 → 正常 例子有:AudioLab、Lightroom、开发助手等

🐳142🌚11🍓6🌭4

16 Nov 2025, 01:45 UTC≈190,000 views353 reactionsread 6 November 2026

整个破逼软件还特么算x,煞笔,果断拉黑不用,

😁280🐳19🍌16👻14🌭9🍓8🌚7

5 Sept 2025, 04:07 UTC≈230,000 views192 reactionsread 6 November 2026

想进内测的自己私聊 @zyfzd 依旧30元子🩲

🍓100🌚21🌭21👻18😁18🍌14

Signed f01a4ba

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bugccx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @bugccx as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fuck for VIP” (@bugccx), 41,701 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bugccx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.