Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net +245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,242–1,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 05:21
1,570
-7
11 Sept 2026, 17:37
1,577
+73
7 Sept 2026, 05:00
1,504
+49
2 Sept 2026, 14:49
1,455
+169
30 Aug 2026, 22:37
1,286
-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:34
1,287
-1
25 Aug 2026, 00:39
1,288
-5
21 Aug 2026, 11:25
1,293
-6
18 Aug 2026, 17:34
1,299
-6
15 Aug 2026, 08:35
1,305
-10
11 Aug 2026, 13:48
1,315
-8
8 Aug 2026, 08:14
1,323
-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:31
1,325
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:59
1,325
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
261 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
112
42.9%
😁
38
14.6%
🤣
36
13.8%
💯
19
7.28%
🔥
14
5.36%
❤🔥
11
4.21%
custom 5251258669445693877
9
3.45%
👍
8
3.07%
👏
7
2.68%
😭
5
1.92%
custom 5251511234997538581
2
0.766%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 11 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bukhalovabrand. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
недолго мы радовались шикарным кадрам с Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли в рекламной кампании «Эконики»
только-только все почувствовали этот свежий глоток свободы, как в комментариях начался пожар
для справки:
в конце июля 2026 года бренд «Эконика» представил осенне-зимнюю рекламную кампанию, лицом которой стала британская супермодель Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли
почти сразу после публикации в соцсетях разгорелся скандал, и брен…
«колобок» повесился
сегодня все ленты только и гудят про премьеру отечественного спин-оффа «последний богатырь. колобок», но есть нюанс)) зрители в кинотеатрах устраивают фильму едва ли не самый громкий бойкот года
ради того, чтобы расчистить «колобку» кассу, киносетям пришлось сдвинуть долгожданный прокат нового «человека-паука» на две недели
ответная реакция не заставила себя ждать: зрители заступились за паучка…
зачем KFC шлет открытки самому себе?
срочное включение, нашла очень добрую рекламную кампанию!
недавно австралийская почта уволила курьера с 36-летним стажем
причина — во время смены он заехал на рабочем фургоне перекусить в KFC
руководство сочло это недопустимым нарушением рабочего маршрута
чтобы другие почтальоны не рисковали работой ради обеда, бренд придумал гениальный и очень милый ход
рестораны начали массо…
80% результатов достигаются 20% усилий
слышали про этот знаменитый принцип Парето?
для меня, человека, выросшего на сказке «Алиса в Зазеркалье» с её великой установкой: «Нужно бежать со всех ног, чтобы только оставаться на месте, а чтобы куда-то попасть, надо бежать как минимум вдвое быстрее!», этот закон долгое время казался чем-то из разряда «магии утра» 😕
то есть абсолютно оторванной от реальности концепцией и …
ехала сегодня в такси и по радио началась трансляция маркетинговой теории заговора
двое мужчин обсуждали, как маркетологи буквально вынуждают нас покупать новые смартфоны и прочие гаджеты
мол, не успел оглянуться, а тобой уже управляют
еду, слушаю и чувствую себя властелином мира 😄
представляется картина: мы, маркетологи, собираемся в полночь в тайном подземелье, надеваем черные мантии, достаем хрустальные шары и…
110 долларов (почти 9 тысяч рублей) — ровно столько американские юристы берут за то, чтобы скинуть инвайт на Zoom-конференцию
готова взять эту работу на себя, дорогие американцы, всего за 50% от прайса 😁
главный модный глянец планеты Vogue снова решил сыграть на наших слабостях и устроил кастинг хвостатых супермоделей
их виртуальный проект Dogue ищет главную звезду для нового выпуска
если ваш четвероногий друг позирует лучше мировых топ-моделей, самое время абсолютно бесплатно заявить о себе через официальное приложение
фотки ждут до 4го августа, а уже 18го числа мы узнаем, чья именно мордочка украсит обложку
обя…
женщина из Тайваня, которая спасла меня от паники
недавно я вспомнила одну очень теплую историю из своего студенчества
мне было двадцать лет, я работала волонтером на баскетбольном чемпионате, и мне поручили сопровождать команду из Тайваня
ребята с порога дали понять, что для них принципиально важно называться именно тайваньской командой, а не китайской, и я, до сих пор следую этому правилу
для меня это была перв…
❤24🔥9👏3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bukhalovabrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинговый стыд” (@bukhalovabrand), 1,570 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bukhalovabrand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.