Channel
𝗕𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆'𝘀 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲𝘁 🦋
@bunnyvideo1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,667subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001964590574 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bunnyvideo1 |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bunnyvideo1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:32 | 1,667 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 1,667 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 1,678 | -11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 1,689 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:26 | 1,706 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 1,709 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 1,717 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 1,719 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sabamusic3 · 32,323
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
@younistaa · 240,654
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 30 August 2026
@fantasyastory · 96,365
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
@lyricvibe_x · 23,571
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 September 2026
@soulforiaa · 64,174
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 10 September 2026
@rianmystery · 48,426
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗕𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆'𝘀 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲𝘁 🦋” (@bunnyvideo1), 1,667 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bunnyvideo1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.