https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Zf4Z6wE4X

Channel
缤纷世界的彩色冒险
@bunte_Welt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,420subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001489457235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bunte_Welt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bunte_Welt |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 7,420 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 7,433 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 7,443 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 7,457 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 7,460 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 7,465 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 7,473 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 7,484 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 7,486 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 7,490 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 7,498 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 7,507 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 7,507 | first reading |
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.40%
- avg views ÷ 7,420 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 104
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.568%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 90 (30 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,978 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 22s
- Average length
- 2m 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 33.3% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkrJ0aMhMbs
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1gt896UEUh
https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/08/26/1142946/bill-gates-ai-danger-threshold/
Bill Gates 只不过是“创业”这个屠宰场的又一个幸存者罢了。把他说的话当作title根本都不是"诉诸权威",而是纯粹的傻子行径。 "Any model that can make novel molecules should be monitored." 可能Bill Gates不知道,人体的免疫系统天天都在制造新的分子用于增强我们的识别能力。哪怕就是在AI这个大背景下,用于设计新分子的技术从Alphafold之前就是一大把。大言不惭的说"monitor",你要监视哪个?你有什么权利监视任何一个? If you’re worried about AI, going to a data center protest is not the most effective way to start the debate about how we minimize these bad things. Just like yel…
👍1
恢复高考后第一届大学生的英语试卷 文中展示的是一份沈阳师范学院中文系1977级二班学生的英语试卷。资料来源于本人昨天的公众号文章《1977级大学生一篇稿件中折射出的信息》。 当年的试题与现在比较起来如何?试题结构如下: 整个试卷共分为七部分,满分100分。 Ⅰ.听写单词(10分) Ⅱ.写出26个字母,并指出元音字母(10分) Ⅲ.变单数名词为复数并在单词下面写出其汉语意思(20分) Ⅳ.将下列句子译成中文(20分) Ⅴ.将下列句子译成英语(40分) Ⅵ.你能写出我们已学过的课堂用语吗?(不计分) Ⅶ.1、下列词是怎样缩写来的?(不计分)2、到现在为止我们已学过的几个句型能够写出吗(不计分)。
法国团队利用离体死后人脑组织控制机械手弹钢琴,该实验有何科学原理和伦理意义? | 原文
同样吃苦,为什么山河四省省吃俭用, 云贵川渝是活在当下? | 原文
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWD2oCP_AfU
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1nTh56XE1i/
🤩 好酷哦 RACK-02 是一款由 SSX360 开发的模块化Techno音乐创作web小程序。它被封装在单个 HTML 文件中,通过浏览器即可运行,支持可验证的离线音频渲染。专注于催眠式和循环驱动的音乐风格,默认节奏为 132 BPM。 用户可以通过拖动旋钮或使用箭头键进行调节,配合 Shift 键可进行微调。步进器的点击循环模式为自动、开启、关闭,配合 Shift 键可设置连击(Ratchet)。空格键控制运行和停止,M 键触发变异,R 键重新生成,数字键 1 到 4 切换场景。由于采用离线渲染技术,即使在实时试听时 CPU 负载过高导致卡顿,导出的音频文件依然能保证样点精确且无掉音。source
https://defcad.com/
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @bunte_Welt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@zhihuribao_rss · 16,66920 posts布告栏上的贴纸
@noticeboardthings · 2,42818 posts知乎大巴扎
@zhihu_bazaar · 22,25313 posts小红书一瞥
@xhsyp · 31,5654 postsEffer für Wissenschaft
@EFW_inno · 1,6582 postszrj766的频道
@zrj96 · 17,1262 postsMarkson 的梦话空间
@MarksonHonSaid · 3201 postHacker News 摘要
@hacker_news_zh · 2,2471 postJustf News
@justfNew · 1,5941 post科技&趣闻&杂记
@kejiqu · 36,4601 post椒盐豆豉剪报
@mtfront · 4,9601 post贪玩电动(停售实体版)
@oojbk · 2,1091 post普拉姆的胡言乱语
@plumzme · 7031 postMJJ出征
@wearemjj · 9,5641 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缤纷世界的彩色冒险” (@bunte_Welt), 7,420 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bunte_Welt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.