Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝔖𝔦𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔯 𝔙𝔢𝔯𝔣𝔞𝔩𝔩

Channel

𝔖𝔦𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔯 𝔙𝔢𝔯𝔣𝔞𝔩𝔩

@burnoutll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002206147728
TypeChannel
Username@burnoutll
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/burnoutll

Growth

495652.59 August 2026 — 49 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers17 August 2026 — 56 subscribers1 September 2026 — 55 subscribers559 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 10:3655-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:2656+6
10 Aug 2026, 11:3150no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:3150+1
9 Aug 2026, 13:3049first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
128.1%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held13 (5 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total775
Reactions total128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4029.9%
custom 54654000179278279523425.4%
custom 52988885811530658602014.9%
💋1410.4%
custom 5327942377053122493128.96%
custom 521092766381587790885.97%
🫡21.49%
custom 526259607314210834710.746%
custom 533056184324721624910.746%
custom 543827529799881222110.746%
custom 544044219489898751110.746%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC4 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

у меня завтра первый академ экзамен, пожелайте удачи любителю который никогда не рисовал ничего подобного. я даже не надеюсь поступить, но это определённо станет интересным опытом.

custom 52988885811530658601

9 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC53 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52988885811530658606custom 53279423770531224935custom 546540001792782795221

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC57 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

мы с вами вновь официально стали нишевой группой. возрадуйтесь нашему малому количеству, ибо другим этот беспредел видеть не дано!

8custom 52988885811530658607custom 54654000179278279526custom 52109276638158779081custom 54382752979988122211

9 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC69 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/boost/burnoutll большое спасибо за вашу поддержку 👀 я мог бы добавить одну любую премиум реакцию(на ваш выбор) в благодарность за голос.

custom 52988885811530658606custom 53279423770531224936custom 546540001792782795231custom 52625960731421083471custom 53305618432472162491custom 54404421948989875111

8 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC88 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

если вам интересна более подробная причина переезда - я почувствовал, что набрал не совсем ту аудиторию, которою хотел. всё-же я больше хочу быть собой и очень рад, что вы у меня остались. я действительно ценю ваше внимание и то, что вы принимаете меня таким. в конце концов это то, для чего я живу👀👀👀

custom 5465400017927827952105🫡2custom 52109276638158779082

8 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC89 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

так называемая смешная” зарисовка. решил опробовать этот стиль и, ожидаемо, у меня вышло

9custom 54654000179278279525custom 52109276638158779083💋2custom 53279423770531224931

8 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC82 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

сегодня я ушёл далеко наверх.

custom 546540001792782795232💋2custom 52109276638158779082

7 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Дана, спасибо за дроп трека))

💋31custom 54654000179278279521

6 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

мои ранние творения, когда всё ещё можно было исправить

3💋1custom 54654000179278279521

6 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC82 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👀🤍

4💋3custom 54654000179278279521

6 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

на сколько сильно моё творчество отражает меня? я хочу в нём присутствовать на сколько то, что я делаю похоже на меня самого, это же как приводить в этот мир своего ребёнка, который так или иначе будет наделён товими чертами. я говорю не только о зарисовках, а в целом.. о музыке, о препарировании, о всём том, что я когда-либо делал или говорил

💋31custom 54654000179278279521

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @burnoutll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝔖𝔦𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔯 𝔙𝔢𝔯𝔣𝔞𝔩𝔩” (@burnoutll), 55 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burnoutll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.