Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net +878. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,297–22,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 20:39
22,307
-4
4 Nov 2026, 18:38
22,311
+4
3 Nov 2026, 18:45
22,307
+1
2 Nov 2026, 18:16
22,306
-4
1 Nov 2026, 17:11
22,310
+13
31 Oct 2026, 15:28
22,297
+3
30 Oct 2026, 16:05
22,294
+1
28 Oct 2026, 14:47
22,293
+10
27 Oct 2026, 16:09
22,283
+19
26 Oct 2026, 14:09
22,264
+9
25 Oct 2026, 16:29
22,255
+8
24 Oct 2026, 15:45
22,247
+3
23 Oct 2026, 19:07
22,244
+6
22 Oct 2026, 20:46
22,238
+13
21 Oct 2026, 13:35
22,225
+4
20 Oct 2026, 11:41
22,221
-1
19 Oct 2026, 08:17
22,222
+1
18 Oct 2026, 07:58
22,221
+20
17 Oct 2026, 07:16
22,201
+13
16 Oct 2026, 07:27
22,188
first reading
Engagement
252 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.97%
avg views ÷ 22,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
662
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.771%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 252 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
252 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
39,045
Reactions total
295
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,550
Videos
≈2,540
Links
≈2,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 48m
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 188 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,287 reactions across 247 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,094
85.0%
🔥
82
6.37%
👍
46
3.57%
🥴
39
3.03%
🙉
4
0.311%
🤡
4
0.311%
😨
3
0.233%
👀
2
0.155%
🙈
2
0.155%
🤣
2
0.155%
🥰
2
0.155%
🥱
2
0.155%
🐳
1
0.078%
👏
1
0.078%
😐
1
0.078%
🤨
1
0.078%
🤩
1
0.078%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 252 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,287 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.35%
16 of 252 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
16
posts carrying an erid · 16 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
586
over 16 measured posts
Median views · rest
725
over 236 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvQjJBT
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
2VtzqwNmmDC
1
16 August 2026
16 August 2026
2VtzqwkvCae
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
2Vtzqwqwm3G
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2Vtzqx24oC7
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2VtzqxKeq4q
1
11 October 2026
11 October 2026
2W5zFFw4rLy
1
12 October 2026
12 October 2026
2W5zFGXgShP
1
27 September 2026
27 September 2026
2W5zFGefW6m
1
30 August 2026
30 August 2026
2W5zFGhwx5F
1
29 August 2026
29 August 2026
2W5zFH3GUk1
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2W5zFHNTw5b
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 4 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 59 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Заготовки для ПП завтраков 🔥
✅ Сохраняйте и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
Ингредиенты (на 5-6 шт):
· Кабачок (без воды) — 300-400 г
· Тертый сыр (легкий) — 100 г
· Мука — 80 г (примерно 2 ст. ложки)
· Яйцо — 1 шт.
· Соль — щепотка
✅ НЕ ГРУЗИТ? - МЫ В MAX
Автор видео: _vera_mlgn_
Тот самый очиститель, который, по словам мужа, «просто гоняет воздух» 😂
✅ Сохраняйте ссылку и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
✔️ Ссылка на очиститель
Цена: 17 835 ₽
✅ 1000 ТОВАРОВ ДЛЯ ДОМА В MAX
Автор видео: smartmirussia
Основные правила выплаты ипотеки 🤫
✅ Сохраняйте и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
1. Не гаси досрочно, если ставка 6% - это практически бесплатные деньги
2. Если гасишь - уменьшай срок, а не платеж
З. Не копи, вноси ! досрочное погашение, % начисляются каждый день на остаток
4. Не забудь вернуть 260 тысяч за покупку и 390 тысяч за %
✅ Больше находок для дома с артикулами тут
Автор видео: klara_fed
Дизайн квартиры 60 м² за 4,3 млн₽ 🔥
✅ Сохраняйте ссылки и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
Как вам дизайн?
❤️ класс
🥴 не очень
Материалы и отделка:
✔️ пол ламинат от застройщика
✔️ стены оттенок 40YY 67/087
✔️ Межкомнатные двери двери Норра-2 белая эмаль (Polar)
Кухня:
✔️ кухня на заказ mebel in
✔️ фасады: Пленка ПВХ Гербера
✔️ плитка на фартуке: Equipe La Riviera 6.5x20 арт. 25847
✔️ стулья зеленые
✔️ стул беж…
Какая ёлка подойдёт именно вам
Высота под ваш потолок, литая хвоя или классическая, со снегом или без, с огоньками или без. У Max Christmas больше 200 моделей искусственных елей, и выбрать сразу непросто.
Поэтому мы сделали бота подбора. Ответьте на несколько вопросов про комнату, интерьер и бюджет, и бот покажет подходящие модели с фото и ценами. Если останутся сомнения, менеджер поможет с высотой и подскажет усло…
Организуем хранение в санузле 🧽
✅ Сохраняйте артикулы и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
✔️ Таз Озон 1629901190
✔️ Ведро Озон 5323181491
✔️ Держатель для губок Озон 1663227874
✔️ Крючки Bб 491827571
✔️ Зажим канцелярский обычный
✅ НЕ ГРУЗИТ? - МЫ В MAX
Автор видео: bardak.kazan
Милейшие стулья для детской 🧸
✅ Сохраняйте ссылку и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
✔️ Ссылка на стул
Цена: 11 149 ₽
✅ 1000 ТОВАРОВ ДЛЯ ДОМА В MAX
Автор видео: kapri_zulya_
Как правильно хранить овощи в квартире 👌
✅ Сохраняйте и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
Было полезно?
🔥 да
🥴 нет
✅ Больше находок для дома с артикулами тут
Автор видео: pliskina_health
Уютное для дома 💔
✅ Сохраняйте артикулы WB и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
✔️ Ручки из дуба от @fajnodesign
Ozon 1413739086
WB 193436598
✔️ Вешалки с зажимами 149834457
✔️ Вешалки-плечики 545977513
✔️ Ковер 185735643
✔️ Органайзер для носков и белья 748437823
✔️ Органайзеры для вещей 1278787074
✔️Светильник 1289662524
✔️ Короб для хранения 265222923
✔️ Вешалка-трансформер OZON 1571631972
✅ НЕ ГРУЗИТ? - МЫ В MA…
Офисное кресло как из Pinterest 💔
✅ Сохраняйте ссылку и подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять
✔️ Ссылка на кресло
Цена: 10 159 ₽
✅ ОСТАЁМСЯ НА СВЯЗИ В MAX
Автор видео: di_mahlysh
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @buro_remont. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 21 posts on @buro_remont as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
12
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
12
vacant every time we have ever looked
@buro_remont named 12 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bath_stone_by named in 3 posts, 31 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
@mebel_mozyr_valeri named in 3 posts, 31 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
@kuchenland__official named in 3 posts, 31 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
@garda_decor_ru named in 3 posts, 24 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
@amianthome named in 3 posts, 24 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
@hygge_homm named in 2 posts, 1 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@babykingdom named in 2 posts, 1 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@modul_kuhnipro named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@fajnodesign named in 1 post, 5 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
@eurohome_spb named in 1 post, 28 September 2026 – 28 September 2026
@lystry_mozyr_ named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
@mebel_lsm named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РЕМОНТ | ДИЗАЙН | ДЕКОР” (@buro_remont), 22,307 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buro_remont.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.