Кто сможет сделать мужскую коробку для контента? С меня 💸 ну и конечно оплата материалов Идей у меня никаких
custom 53777679404666931004

Channel
@businabrands
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36,516subscribers
-5,981 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001871312146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @businabrands |
| Description | Ключик экономии для каждой🩷 Есть и в наличии, и под заказ! Все обо мне и моих бизнесах https://leonovaxx.taplink.ws/ Оригинальные брендовые товары•Парфюм•Одежда своего производства Сделать заказ : @leonovaxxx/@leonovaxxx2 — парфюм и брендовые товары |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/businabrands |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 36,516 | -37 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 36,553 | -21 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 36,574 | -89 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 36,663 | -56 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 36,719 | -70 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 36,789 | +47 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 36,742 | -46 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 36,788 | -37 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:04 | 36,825 | -51 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 36,876 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 36,913 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 36,900 | +68 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 36,832 | +188 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 36,644 | +34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 36,610 | -72 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 36,682 | -36 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 36,718 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 36,735 | -126 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 36,861 | -137 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 36,998 | first reading |
363 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 177 of 221 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 363 (6 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 343,780 |
| Reactions total | 1,813 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 01:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,369 reactions across 300 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5442651143823979172 | 1,724 | 39.5% | |
| custom 5377767940466693100 | 1,694 | 38.8% | |
| custom 5913552552158302985 | 951 | 21.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 301 of the 363 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 363 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @businabrands. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 363 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кто сможет сделать мужскую коробку для контента? С меня 💸 ну и конечно оплата материалов Идей у меня никаких
custom 53777679404666931004
Ситуация: взрослая женщина делает заказ, потом оказалось, что она вообще не любит оверсайз костюмы (штаны), я понимаю, что когда мы ей отошьем и она получит этот костюм, он не сядет так, как она хотела бы, поэтому всегда говорю свое мнение и лучше предлагаю возврат в таком случае Для меня важно, чтобы каждый при получении заказа был счастлив и если понимаю, чувствую, что будет что-то не так, я лучше скажу сразу💗
custom 53777679404666931007custom 59135525521583029854
Такой свежий, спокойный аромат, приятный🧘🏼♀️
custom 54426511438239791726
Спасибо за костюм! По параметрам все идеально, качество бомба, я его с открытым ртом распаковывала😂😂 ща в канал выложу ссылку на твой бренд)
custom 53777679404666931001
Добрый день, Получили и уже померили костюмчики!Все успело придти,спасибо вам огромное❤️ Позже выложу фотки с отметками в сторис 💋
custom 53777679404666931001
Вика, привет. Забрала сумку с вышивкой и костюм с крыльями 🪽. Это офигенно 😍😍😍помнишь я заказывала кофту розовую с вышивкой из велюра? она тоже крутого качества, но у этого цвета молоко немного другой велюр он реально такой плюшевый супер мягкий что ли короче вайб!!!! 💯. Все твои слова по поводу того, что качество вышка я подтверждаю !!!! И сумка она прям такая мягкаяяя вообще супер мягкая такая, ну в общем большое …
custom 53777679404666931001
Привет) Сумочка отличная, идеальный размерчик 😍 Быстрая доставка, хорошо упакована, вообще не переживаю, что может что-то случиться, заказывая у тебя. Очень рада пополнению, спасибо тебе ☺️
custom 53777679404666931001
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53777679404666931001
Добрый вечер🌸 Извиняюсь , что так поздно уже , но хотелось бы сказать спасибо большое за костюм , забрала , не отпаривая его сразу же одела и уехала в горы 😍 Настолько мне понравился он и качество просто шикарное. Очень переживала по поводу размера , но все село четко и даже не хочется его снимать 🤍 Я может упустила тот момент, что еще идет топ к нему , приятно была удивлена 🥰
custom 53777679404666931001
это восторг 🙏🏼💔
custom 53777679404666931001
Решила написать отзыв после нескольких активных носок, чтобы подтвердить свои слова делом. Вика, вы создали шедевр! 👏 Что важно: ✨ Ощущения: Ткань — космос. Невесомая, но очень тёплая. Тело дышит, но мёрзнуть не даёт. ✨ Посадка: 10/10. Для моего мини-роста это разрыв сердечка! 😍 Никакой "гармошки" внизу, никаких ателье и подшиваний. Штаны лежат безупречно. ✨ Подход: Чувствуется, что вещь создаётся с душой, под конкре…
custom 53777679404666931001
Здравствуйте,забрала кофту,качество просто супер,она шикарная 😍💘 Спасибо вам большое ✨
custom 53777679404666931001
Showing the 12 most recent of 363 posts we hold for @businabrands. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Б У С И Н А” (@businabrands), 36,516 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/businabrands.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.