Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БИЗНЕС PRO | Брендинг и Маркетинг

Channel

БИЗНЕС PRO | Брендинг и Маркетинг

@businesspro_inc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

31,604subscribers

-668 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002149067367
TypeChannel
Username@businesspro_inc
DescriptionИнтересный маркетинг - рекомендации, кейсы, инструменты Реклама: @jamesvinoli Канал на Telega in: https://telega.in/c/businesspro_inc Чат для маркетологов и предпринимателей @businessprochat
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/businesspro_inc

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,60432,27231,9387 August 2026 — 32,272 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,272 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,264 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,256 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,240 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,225 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,214 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,187 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,123 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,079 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,081 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,056 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,034 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,014 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,097 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,105 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,080 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,062 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,043 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,023 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,003 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,001 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,998 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,972 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,958 subscribers3 September 2026 — 31,923 subscribers5 September 2026 — 31,856 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,756 subscribers11 September 2026 — 31,691 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,687 subscribers14 September 2026 — 31,668 subscribers16 September 2026 — 31,649 subscribers19 September 2026 — 31,604 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -668. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,504–32,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:0131,604-45
16 Sept 2026, 22:1731,649-19
14 Sept 2026, 21:4031,668-19
13 Sept 2026, 11:3631,687-4
11 Sept 2026, 14:3631,691-65
9 Sept 2026, 01:0131,756-100
5 Sept 2026, 17:4131,856-67
3 Sept 2026, 15:5631,923-35
2 Sept 2026, 12:0631,958-14
1 Sept 2026, 15:0331,972-26
31 Aug 2026, 11:4431,998-3
30 Aug 2026, 11:3532,001-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:0732,003-20
28 Aug 2026, 18:0732,023-20
27 Aug 2026, 16:2732,043-19
26 Aug 2026, 18:1132,062-18
25 Aug 2026, 18:3332,080-25
24 Aug 2026, 16:4432,105+8
22 Aug 2026, 21:5232,097+83
21 Aug 2026, 15:0632,014first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.44%
avg views ÷ 31,604 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held57 (1 August 202622 September 2026)
Views total49,904
Reactions total605
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
548
Videos
260
Links
591

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 09s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,257 reactions across 52 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥49839.6%
38830.9%
👍1118.83%
😁967.64%
🤔967.64%
👏191.51%
🤣171.35%
🤯131.03%
😢120.955%
😍30.239%
🤩20.159%
🥰20.159%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 57 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @businesspro_inc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.75%
1 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,110
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,970
over 56 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGDb83b122 September 202622 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC954 views7 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

У бренда есть не более 24 часов, чтобы отреагировать на публичное обвинение Как это сделать — уже разбирали в одном из прошлых материалов, а теперь — о сроках. Ещё десять лет назад окно реакции составляло 3-4 дня, но в 2026 году счёт идёт на часы: 🟠 3 часа от сигнала — реальное окно для первой публичной позиции бренда 🟠 12 часов — окно для активной фазы реагирования 🟠 24–36 часов — окно для разворота информационно

7

22 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,110 views12 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGDb83b

Если без Excel и Google Таблиц не проходит и дня, — вы наверняка знаете, сколько времени в них теряется. В 2026 году до 80% рутины уже давно делает ИИ. По сути, вы получаете бесплатного ассистента внутри таблицы, который выдаёт формулы любой сложности, находит аномалии и делает выводы. Чтобы вернуть себе до 10 часов в неделю, отдайте часть своей работы ИИ — на курсе «Нейросети для Excel и Google Таблиц» от Академии

6👍4🔥2

21 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 23 September 2026
Poll

Чей ход кажется вам сильнее?

  1. Savage X Fenty62%
  2. McDonald’s38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,310 views6 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Теневой маркетинг: кто круче? Два нестандартных кейса сентября, где главным рекламным инструментом стали тени: 🟠 Savage X Fenty в Нью-Йорке Бренд нижнего белья разместил над Фэшн-авеню гигантские версии своих изделий. Тени о них падали на асфальт, превращая дорожное полотно в рекламу. Так компания хотела пробиться сквозь визуальный шум города и создать вау-эффект. 🟠 McDonald’s в Нидерландах Бренд взял четыре ку

4🔥2

20 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,360 views14 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Must-read для маркетолога в 2026 году Литрес собрал топ-10 самых популярных в России книг по маркетингу. Забирайте названия и ссылки на полный текст 👇 1️⃣ «Психология сарафанного радио. Как сделать продукты и идеи популярными», Йон Бергер Читать: Литрес / Яндекс Книги 2️⃣ «Маркетинг без бюджета. 50 работающих инструментов», Игорь Манн Читать: Литрес 3️⃣ «Digital-маркетинг. Главная книга интернет-маркетолога», В

8🔥4👍2

19 Sept 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,490 views23 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Билборд с человеком внутри от Netflix помните? Ловите армянскую адаптацию 😁 По улицам Ереван прокатился грузовик с прозрачным кузовом, внутри которого сначала на кровати отдыхала девушка, а затем читал газету мужчина. Так бренд PROFAL решил прорекламировать свои звукоизоляционные окна и наглядно показать, что городской шум с ними не страшен. Итог (ожидаемый?): кадры с грузовиком разлетелись по интернету далеко за

10🔥9😁4

18 Sept 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,600 views19 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Селебрити, у нас отмена Кажется, бюджет на коллаборации с известными людьми можно больше не выделять 👨‍💻 Нашли свежее исследование от коллег на тему звёздных интеграций. Делимся с вами ключевыми выводами: 🟠 При выборе между разными упаковками одного и того же продукта, 79% потребителей предпочтут вариант без изображения известной персоны 🟠 Знаменитость должна подходить продукту по образу и репутации — это важно д

😁8👍63🤯2

17 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,830 views35 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Apple против нейронок в рекламе Иначе как объяснить тот факт, что рекламный ролик для нового Mac mini буквально создали вручную? Героями пластилиновой анимации стали бодибилдер, гоночный автомобиль и ракета — через этих персонажей Apple визуализировала основные преимущества нового устройства. Как вам? 🔥 — свежо ❤️ — мило, но непродающе 🤔 — от технологического гиганта ожидаешь другого @businesspro_inc

🔥15🤔119

16 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,960 views18 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Низкие цены — не всегда преимущество «Качество товара или услуги напрямую связано с их ценой» Это убеждение у потребителей сформировалась уже давно. Научные эксперименты показывают, что высокая стоимость товара или услуги может не только усилить позитивные впечатления от их использования, но и физически воздействовать на человека. Листайте карточки — в них подробности👆 В маркетинге эту денежную склейку полезно уч

9🔥5🤔3🤯1

15 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,820 views28 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

IKEA UAE превратила ошибки своих клиентов в игру — и взорвала TikTok Дубайское подразделение бренда запустило в соцсети «The Swedish Test» — голосовую игру, где пользователю нужно правильно произнести названия товаров на шведском языке. Пройдёте её полностью — забираете подарочную карту IKEA. Так компания решила обыграть забавный элемент бренда, который прежде не использовался — труднопроизносимые и порой мемные на

🔥196👍3

14 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,900 views28 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Вы нам — золото, мы вам — куриные наггетсы Такой бартер предложил новозеландцам KFC в честь выхода соуса «Жидкое золото». На пару дней ресторан в городе Окленд стал «ломбардом», где можно было обменять на бесплатную упаковку наггетсов или новый лимитированный соус практически всё, что выглядит как золото — подлинность металла никто не проверял. Акция вызвала огромный ажиотаж в соцсетях из-за низкого порога входа:

😁158👍4🤔1

12 Sept 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,110 views19 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Забрендировать мокрое пятно? Легко 🤝 Heineken представил новый дизайн своих бокалов, основание которых выполнено в форме фирменной звезды бренда. Когда холодный бокал ставят на стол, конденсат оставляет на поверхности её отпечаток. На разработку ушло 9 лет, но зато теперь в барах по всему миру компанию ждёт бесплатная нативная реклама. Сегодня у нас есть повод выпить за коллег 😁 @businesspro_inc

🔥12😁43

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @businesspro_inc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

Чей ход кажется вам сильнее?

  1. Savage X Fenty62%
  2. McDonald’s38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTCAnonymous Poll248 voters

Какую ценность вы хотите получить от канала?

  1. Новые идеи для работы60%
  2. Профессиональное развитие55%
  3. Готовые решения, которые можно внедрить58%
  4. Вдохновение и насмотренность59%

The shares total 232%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTCAnonymous Poll224 voters

Какой контент для вас актуален?

  1. Реальные кейсы компаний57%
  2. Исследования, аналитика и цифры39%
  3. Практические инструменты и шаблоны64%
  4. Разборы ошибок и стратегий54%
  5. Подборки полезных материалов54%
  6. Новости рынка23%

The shares total 291%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTCAnonymous Poll225 voters

Что больше всего сейчас «болит»?

  1. Поиск клиентов44%
  2. Продажи и переговоры22%
  3. Маркетинговая стратегия46%
  4. Аналитика и оценка эффективности30%
  5. Ситуация на рынке37%

The shares total 179%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTCAnonymous Poll260 voters

Чем вы сейчас занимаетесь?

  1. Маркетинг39%
  2. Продажи13%
  3. Предприниматель / собственник30%
  4. Запускаю свой проект17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БИЗНЕС PRO | Брендинг и Маркетинг” (@businesspro_inc), 31,604 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/businesspro_inc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.