Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Климченко | про нейросети

Channel

Климченко | про нейросети

@buyonhigh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,427subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725809899
TypeChannel
Username@buyonhigh
Created11 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/buyonhigh

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,4064,4784,4426 August 2026 — 4,478 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,476 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,469 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,460 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,449 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,442 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,426 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,418 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,413 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,406 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,421 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,423 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,415 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,427 subscribers4,4276 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,395–4,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:154,427+12
14 Sept 2026, 09:144,415-8
10 Sept 2026, 20:564,423+2
5 Sept 2026, 10:154,421+15
1 Sept 2026, 13:474,406-7
29 Aug 2026, 21:344,413-5
26 Aug 2026, 22:334,418-8
23 Aug 2026, 19:084,426-16
20 Aug 2026, 00:114,442-7
16 Aug 2026, 15:434,449-11
12 Aug 2026, 19:184,460-9
9 Aug 2026, 16:214,469-7
6 Aug 2026, 21:304,476-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:064,478first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

865 reactions across 22 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥26230.3%
👍22325.8%
🐳13215.3%
10912.6%
😁374.28%
🍾242.77%
222.54%
🤝161.85%
🤯131.50%
🤔91.04%
👎60.694%
😱60.694%
😢30.347%
🫡30.347%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 967 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 25 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @buyonhigh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC260 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁125🔥5🐳3👍2

7 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC520 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очередная карта, но для ИИ агента 4 авгутса Cloudflare (если ты вайбкодишь, то просто обязан знать что это) объявил Cloudflare Wallets – система, которая даёт AI-агентам постоянный ID и возможность платить за API, датасеты и сервисы стейблкоинами. 😕 Что именно запускают: • Account Wallet – основной кошелёк владельца, туда закидываешь стейблы, оттуда управляешь лимитами • Virtual Wallet – кошелёк для конкретного аг

🔥9👍642🐳1

7 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC582 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Умеешь руками править код?

  1. Да, но не профессионально34%
  2. Нет49%
  3. Да, я про.разработчик18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍7🔥43🐳2🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC608 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Это так заезжено, но каждый раз в слюни с этого мема. Лично знаю таких людей (я). @buyonhigh

😁18👍9🔥7🐳21

6 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC627 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

БЫТОВЫЕ ЛАЙФХАКИ: где смотреть статус сервисов Большинство того, что создают люди или о чём снимают ролики – на деле бесполезное говно. Поэтому в рубрике БЫТОВЫЕ ЛАЙФХАКИ я даю только свои личные проверенные рекомендации. Только что сервера GitHub Actions прилегли отдохнуть ровно на самом интересном месте работы. Пока сидел и думал "это у меня руки кривые или у них там всё легло" – вспомнил, что у каждого приличног

🔥17👍843🐳2🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC679 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цукерберг ответил Claude Code и Codex Meta показала Muse Spark 1.2 и Muse Code. По задумке – прямьй конкурент Claude Code и Codex. 1️⃣Что умеет это чудо: • Полный цикл по репозиторию: разобрал код, накидал план, внёс правки, прогнал тесты, поднялся после сбоя • Запускает параллельных субагентов – архитектура, тесты, документация, поиск альтернатив, у всех общий контекст сессии • Ведёт локальный журнал запросов, вы

9👍7🔥64🐳3🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC816 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Какое же GPT говно После трех дней попыток настроить ChatGPT в создание презентаций и 42 вариантов в очередной раз убеждаюсь, что ЧатГПТ говнище не способное в создание чего-то классного кроме генерации картинок. И рот я его шатал. Скормил ему свои референсы, вылизал общее ядро – дизайн, tone of voice, структура, логика подачи. Хотел один раз собарть нормальную структуру, чтобы потом просто нажимать кнопку – как бы

🔥13🤯75🐳5👍4😱4🤔2🤝2

3 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,030 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я чуть-чуть заплакал Очень приятно когда люди пишут благодарность за любую помощь которую в моих силах предоставить. Вот я разыграл недавно подписки на Клода, и вот человек уже создает своё приложение. 😍 Веду этот канал только ради вас и ваших слов благодарности! У меня кстати ещё коды есть, в ближайшее время разыграю. @buyonhigh

🔥3110👍8🐳6🍾1🫡1😢1

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈8,280 views61 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Год халявного Gemini Нашел рабочую схему получить подписку Google Gemini AI Plus бесплатно на 12 месяцев через индийскую студенческую прогрммму. ❤️ Экономия $60, а делов на 5 минут: • идёшь на https://internshala.com • логинишься через свой Google-аккаунт • заполняешь анкету – данные можно указать произвольные • для ориентира: город Mumbai, языки английский+хинди, тип college student, курс MBA, вуз JBIMS, обучение

🔥37👍117🍾3🐳3

1 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,170 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍189🔥6🐳4🤝3

1 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,240 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

САМАЯ ЛУЧША КАРТА ДЛЯ ВСЕГО И поверь, я не зря написал заголовок поста КАПСЛОКОМ. Я реально нашёл лучшее решение которое объеденяет в себе карту пополняемую и криптой, и рублями, и без ебли с регистрациями для граждан РФ и СНГ. ❗️Официально заявляю: карты от Bybit, Freedom, Pionex, KAST, Tria и прочие – больше не нужны. 😍 Altyn Wallet – я больше 4 месяцев ждал когда этот электронный кошелёк запустит карты и теперь

🔥186👍6🐳5🤝4🍾1👎1

28 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,280 views51 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

КРИК ДУШИ | нейро-коллекционеры идиоты Скиллы, промпты, гитхабы для агентов – я никогда не видел в этом смыла. Меня утомили десятки однотипных каналов и сотни рилсов где тупые люди, которые только вчера установили себе ГПТ, рекомендуют каждый божий день устанавливать какие-то блять плагины, скилы или гитхаб репозитории, думая что от этого их хуй станет больше, а в голове появятся мозги. 🤦‍♂️ ХВАТИТ СТРАДАТЬ ХУЙНЁЙ

🔥20👍11🐳97🤝2🤔1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @buyonhigh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTCAnonymous Poll160 voters

Умеешь руками править код?

  1. Да, но не профессионально34%
  2. Нет49%
  3. Да, я про.разработчик18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Климченко | про криптовалюту
@thevse · 35,323
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Климченко | про нейросети” (@buyonhigh), 4,427 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buyonhigh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.