Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Buzzit.TON

Channel

Buzzit.TON

@buzzitton

Not marked by Telegram, checked 12 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,360,917subscribers

-37,846 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002304398526
TypeChannel
Username@buzzitton
Descriptionthe first-ever voting mini-app in telegram @buzzit1_bot check our X: https://x.com/buzzit_public
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 21 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/buzzitton

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,360,9174,398,7634,379,8407 August 2026 — 4,398,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,398,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,398,554 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,396,895 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,394,968 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,393,851 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,391,498 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,389,394 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,386,360 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,380,921 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,376,541 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,372,912 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,368,779 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,364,268 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,360,917 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 13 days, net -37,846. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,355,240–4,404,440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 00:074,360,917-3,351
19 Aug 2026, 20:514,364,268-4,511
18 Aug 2026, 22:184,368,779-4,133
17 Aug 2026, 21:434,372,912-3,629
16 Aug 2026, 21:544,376,541-4,380
15 Aug 2026, 16:174,380,921-5,439
14 Aug 2026, 01:454,386,360-3,034
12 Aug 2026, 21:544,389,394-2,104
11 Aug 2026, 20:434,391,498-2,353
10 Aug 2026, 20:054,393,851-1,117
9 Aug 2026, 20:534,394,968-1,927
8 Aug 2026, 18:284,396,895-1,659
7 Aug 2026, 17:544,398,554-209
7 Aug 2026, 14:454,398,763no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:364,398,763first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10,740 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10,740100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,740reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
150
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 19 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @buzzitton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2025 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 17:37 UTC≈23,000 views52 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🐝 BUZZERS, LISTEN UP! 🐝 Word on the hive: 67 App just dropped and it’s seriously addictive - fresh out of the oven 🍞 An Alpha Squad is forming. Jump in, flex that hive-mind, and farm the early buzz together. 🐝💥🤑

🔥52

3 Jun 2025, 10:19 UTC≈213,000 views447 reactions9 Starsread 22 August 2026

Buzzers, we are currently on technical maintenance. Those of you who have USDT deposits will be credited to your wallets shortly.

🔥447

31 May 2025, 13:21 UTC≈117,000 views318 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

New USDT events have already buzzed in to the app 🐝 Come and make sure to check out the “USDT events” tab.

🔥318

29 May 2025, 20:47 UTC≈101,000 views222 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

Probably the first on TON to offer real rewards. Hey, Buzzers. In case you missed it, we've launched our first voting event where you can put USDT on stake and earn real returns. No tapping — just skill and alpha. VOTE WITH USDT!

🔥222

28 May 2025, 21:02 UTC≈84,100 views256 reactions4 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚨 BIG STEP BUZZERS! 🚨 We’re leveling up — it’s time to put your skills to the real test with USDT on the line 💸 The very first USDT event is live — go make your call before the deadline hits. Right prediction = real rewards. No pressure. Just alpha.

🔥256

24 May 2025, 21:06 UTC≈85,800 views435 reactionsread 22 August 2026

👨‍🍳 We’re cooking up something cool for you tonight! Our devs are deep in the kitchen, and it might take a few hours to finish. During that time, the app could be temporarily unavailable. Sit tight, be patient, and swing back later — fresh events and updates are on the way!

🔥435

14 May 2025, 20:29 UTC≈107,000 views419 reactions8 Starsread 22 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥419

14 May 2025, 20:27 UTC≈101,000 views318 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🐝🐝🐝 The dinos are falling one by one-tap apps, sticker farms, you name it. Some say extinction is near. Others say a new era is coming. Cast your bets: who’s the first to go extinct? (Maybe even Buzzit? We’re not afraid to be on the list.)

🔥318

14 May 2025, 20:27 UTC≈95,600 views213 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

🐝: “Which Telegram mini app dies first?”

  1. Blum34%
  2. Major17%
  3. Notpixel22%
  4. Buzzit🙅‍♂️28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥213

13 May 2025, 17:29 UTC≈98,200 views360 reactions5 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Telegram Mini Apps are dead? That’s what people are saying. The market’s tired, sticker farms are fading, and tap-to-earn apps? Basically fossils. We almost flatlined too. But instead, we built the first mini app where you can actually earn real money – not just badges and confetti. Now we’re nearly there. The release is coming... Hop into the app ASAP – there’s a crucial question live right now. Cast your vote an

🔥360

15 Apr 2025, 13:35 UTC≈160,000 views1,400 reactions24 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

A message from your favorite dev, Alex. Some time ago, our visionary CEO Chris 🐝 came to me and said: "Alex, build something fun. Something bold. Something that makes people earn and feel that sweet hit of dopamine." I took it seriously. I went deep. I ignored sunlight. And now – I’m ready. We’ve come a long way together: – 220 wild, ridiculous, and brilliant questions – $40,000+ distributed in raffles – Countless

🔥1,400

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @buzzitton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 May 2025, 20:27 UTCAnonymous Poll6,350 voters approx.

🐝: “Which Telegram mini app dies first?”

  1. Blum34%
  2. Major17%
  3. Notpixel22%
  4. Buzzit🙅‍♂️28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Mar 2025, 20:13 UTCAnonymous Poll7,360 voters approx.

🌼 Would you play this game? 😒

  1. Take my USDT! – I'm totally in53%
  2. Show me the rules first29%
  3. Nope, I'll just watch18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 15 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 987,207 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Buzzit.TON” (@buzzitton), 4,360,917 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buzzitton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.