https://before.town/posts/g7eovw43piaagie
❤1

Channel
@by_limboy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
575subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002021156659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @by_limboy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/by_limboy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 575 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 572 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 571 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 572 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 570 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 23 | 35.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://before.town/posts/g7eovw43piaagie
❤1
https://read.limboy.me/life-is-short/zh
互联网的黑暗森林理论 https://read.limboy.me/the-dark-forest-theory-of-the-internet/zh
https://jy.cafe/
❤3
https://before.town/
👍3
https://read.limboy.me/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted/zh NewYorker 上的一篇关于 Sam Altman 的长文,把它翻译成了中文 核心围绕:「一个被多名前同事和董事形容为惯于欺骗、优先个人与商业利益、擅长现实扭曲场的领导人,是否真正值得托付足以改变甚至毁灭文明的超级AI技术」展开 PS: Aaron Swartz 临终前对 Sam Altman 的评价 > "You need to understand that Sam can never be trusted ... He is a sociopath. He would do anything."
👍1
🤔
🥰4
https://read.limboy.me/1984 捯饬了一个 subdomain 用来放一些自己觉得不错的内容。再也不用担心原文的排版问题,还可以放方便地放上译文,甚至一本书。
❤2
打算取消 Premium 订阅,然后看到了这个,那就再续三个月吧···
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
你别说,你还真别说
🤣5
走进一家麦当劳, 服务员们在开心地聊着社保、退休, 完全没有意识到即将被 AI 取代。 我只能上前打断她们: 这个瓶子不要的话,我就收走了。
😁13🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @by_limboy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Limboy's Secret Garden” (@by_limboy), 575 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/by_limboy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.