Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОТЗЫВЫ | BYEBYE VIRTS

Channel

ОТЗЫВЫ | BYEBYE VIRTS

@byebye_rev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

134subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002400879934
TypeChannel
Username@byebye_rev
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/byebye_rev

Growth

1341361357 August 2026 — 136 subscribers8 August 2026 — 136 subscribers15 August 2026 — 135 subscribers23 August 2026 — 134 subscribers29 August 2026 — 135 subscribers6 September 2026 — 134 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 19:41134-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:24135+1
23 Aug 2026, 11:44134-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:36135-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:31136no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31136first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

19 Apr 2026, 15:53 UTC284 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @ShaXre24 оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Лучшие просто пришло за 10 минут буквально»

19 Apr 2026, 15:51 UTC283 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @Kadet110122 оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Всё отлично!»

19 Apr 2026, 15:51 UTC282 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @grishka_20 оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Сомневался, что это мошенники, но купил. Встретились в игре, передали. Рекомендую! ✅🎮👍»

27 Mar 2026, 17:43 UTC384 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @NEKTORINILOVEYOU оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Круто, но ждал долго (»

27 Mar 2026, 17:43 UTC369 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @Kirya_the_great оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «всё прошло идеально, даже чуть больше дали. Рекомендую!»

26 Mar 2026, 18:55 UTC343 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @Kirya_the_great оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «спасибо огромное, кайфовый бот, все вирты пришли ❤️»

16 Mar 2026, 17:46 UTC398 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @I_Am_Urist оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Прошло даже больше чем нужно»

14 Mar 2026, 00:05 UTC391 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @iomaio_epta оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «продавали долговатенько, но всеравно четко выплатили»

13 Mar 2026, 21:36 UTC357 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь 740 оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Ровные ребята, менеджер быстро ответил, принял вирты, оплатил. 24кк продавал»

13 Mar 2026, 18:18 UTC318 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь 041 оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «спс, сразу вывели. рекомендуюю бота»

13 Mar 2026, 18:09 UTC289 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @Denis_Merenkov оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «Спасбо, продал виртов на 540р. Деньги скинули»

10 Mar 2026, 11:30 UTC291 viewsread 8 August 2026

Пользователь @m1charello оставил отзыв о сделке с ботом «долговато было, но компенсировали, вообще имба»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @byebye_rev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОТЗЫВЫ | BYEBYE VIRTS” (@byebye_rev), 134 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/byebye_rev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.