Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BYSAINTLY

Channel

BYSAINTLY

@bysaintly1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,534subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639320107
TypeChannel
Username@bysaintly1
Created16 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bysaintly1

Growth

3,5263,5763,5517 August 2026 — 3,534 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,526 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,528 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,576 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,571 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,560 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,551 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,550 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,534 subscribers3,5347 August 20265 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,519–3,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 14:193,534-16
2 Sept 2026, 00:393,550-1
29 Aug 2026, 14:043,551-9
26 Aug 2026, 13:383,560-11
23 Aug 2026, 03:533,571-5
19 Aug 2026, 23:473,576+48
13 Aug 2026, 12:283,528+2
10 Aug 2026, 07:083,526-8
7 Aug 2026, 10:013,534no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:573,534first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

785 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋27334.8%
💯14318.2%
custom 521557456932202945710012.7%
custom 52176892351249217389011.5%
💔7910.1%
custom 5208679832551958371546.88%
custom 5456496915795431397465.86%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 785 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bysaintly1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC221 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Оч хорошо! 👄

custom 52155745693220294573

7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC225 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему я такая ебанутая? Так же мои пары по криминалистике

custom 52086798325519583719

7 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC263 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Помните?)

💯2custom 54564969157954313972

6 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC630 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если вам кажется, что людям вы не нравитесь, вы не такой и вы не заслуживаете любовь… Вы подсознательно отсеиваете доказательства обратного…. Это называется социальная гипербдительность. Обычно это происходит, когда мы зацикливаемся на сказанных неприятных вещах давно, травле или взрослении в постоянной критике. Мозг научился искать отвержения раньше, чем связь с людьми и своими собственными убеждениями о нас самих!

💔21custom 545649691579543139713custom 52155745693220294574💯1

30 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC≈1,640 views118 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔓

💋52💯32💔19custom 52155745693220294577custom 52176892351249217384custom 54564969157954313974

29 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,460 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Хоть бы мы с вами 🌬️

💋27custom 521557456932202945711custom 52086798325519583719💯1

23 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,440 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Плюс со мной дружить: торт на др подружке 🥳🥳🥳

💋71💔28custom 521768923512492173826custom 52155745693220294575

14 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,960 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда вам приходится выставлять супер красивые свои фотки либо немного раскованные, чтоб наконец-то о вас вспомнили и написали, то такие отношения нам не нужны, девочки 😭💔

💯75💋40

11 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC≈3,040 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💔💔💔

💯32💋8💔6custom 52155745693220294573

11 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC≈2,710 views112 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь! 👼

custom 521768923512492173852💋27custom 521557456932202945718custom 52086798325519583716💔5custom 54564969157954313974

5 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC≈2,640 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Живу ради такой дофаминовой ерунды !!! Плюс педикюр черный с блестками….

💋48custom 521557456932202945728custom 545649691579543139718custom 52086798325519583712

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bysaintly1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

грустнобезтебя
@grustnobezt3bya · 38,162
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BYSAINTLY” (@bysaintly1), 3,534 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bysaintly1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.