Channel
@cabalq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
222subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002692868793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cabalq |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cabalq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 222 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 210 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 205 | +8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 197 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 195 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 195 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 193 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
80 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 10.0% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cabalq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
What are your thoughts regarding Black Friday? The only question for me was if someone programmatically voted? I spent 2 minutes, found out and decided that it's too risky for me I could try to win competitions for the sake of Catchchain, would I succeed? There is a chance to lose and I don't wanna take that chance, sorry guys
Signed Red Wall
Give him some support, probably it's a birth of new TON/GRAM legend I'm sure he can make sick content for our chain, come on guys! https://youtu.be/n1hsmwYT6Ho
❤7🔥3
Signed Red Wall
GM GF What I observe every day is that people like Telegram stickers and they create coins and build communities around them. That's one of the sides. At the same time I see new applications, games and tools are built too. What if later we see integrations of these games/tools with sticker pack coins. To begin with, they can utilize old and established coins such as utya, redo, cherry and buddy and then add other c…
Signed Red Wall
By the way, this may happen quite soon 📈
Signed Red Wall
While we're finalizing new features and preparing for the next Streak Challenge, we've decided to launch a new initiative to rent votes for Parabola. The team has managed to accumulate several hundred NFTs for voting, and we're offering vote rentals for the Parabola competition. 1 vote = 0.1 GRAM, 100 votes = 10 GRAM, with a minimum rental of 10 votes. Part of the profit will go toward the development of the Catch…
🔥3
Signed Red Wall
GM GF, What's new except that minor thing at night which liquidated your GRAM positions?
😁3🌚2
Signed Red Wall
June goals (results) Cooking 👨🍳 🍊 CATCHAIN buyback: 66 GRAM (0 — > 30 GRAM) ✅✅ X subs: 231 (210 —> 230) ✅ Public wallet: $5000 ($2900 —> $3500) ✅✅✅ June was a fun month, I started to build something for Catchain plus I bought it every day, each time 1 GRAM and in the end it turned out that I made 66 exchanges 👍 I was a bit more active on X as and achieved 231 followers there, it's still difficult but I will cont…
🔥4❤2
Signed Red Wall
Would you agree, that Groyp is the best CTO project on Ton? Currently and historically. What other successful CTOs do you remember? Of course, KITO comes to mind first, but obviously not nearly as successful as Groyp.
❤8💯3🔥3
Signed Вадим
GM GF Sorry can't find good gifs anymore
😁5
Signed Red Wall
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Red Wall
Posted without readable text
❤5
Signed Red Wall
GM GF I read Groyp updates every day, and they do a lot, if you don't hold a bag - my condolences. Today I compared their revenue with Stonfi, Dedust, Stonks and Storm Probably you ask me why Stonks is here, but you should know that according to defillama they have five and once six figures monthly revenue lately I will prepare a detailed analysis for you guys today, feel free to ask questions rn here so I can add…
❤11🤔2
Signed Red Wall
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cabalq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Green Forest 🌲” (@cabalq), 222 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cabalq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.