Finally, Professional Ethics ke amendments aa gaye hain ✅ Exams ke liye bahut important hain — isse carefully note kar lena. Watch here 👇 For CA Final Audit https://youtu.be/N9hO_0kDup0 NBFC ke amendments bhi bahut soon leke aa raha hoon. Stay tuned! 💯 Mast raho. Smart padho. — RT

Channel
💡CA Final Vsmart Academy Official
@cafinalvsmartacademy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,610subscribers
-176 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001555026795 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cafinalvsmartacademy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cafinalvsmartacademy |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 12,610 | -15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 12,625 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 12,630 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 12,644 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 12,660 | -20 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 12,680 | -21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 12,701 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 12,710 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 12,715 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 12,727 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 12,729 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 12,733 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 12,740 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 12,744 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 12,755 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 12,760 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 12,765 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 12,772 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 12,783 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 12,786 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.43%
- avg views ÷ 12,610 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 432
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (3 January 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 432 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
CA Final Audit students 🔥 Finally, we are releasing CA Final Audit 250+ Important Questions for Nov’26 exams ✅ These questions are selected with strong logic, past trends and exam-oriented filtering. If used properly, this list may contribute around 70% of the paper 💯 And the best part — we’ll be bringing awesome videos on all these 250 questions soon. In these videos, we’ll cover: • Logical explanation • How to …
Finally how was ca final audit ?
- Easy7%
- Medium26%
- Difficult7%
- Here just to see poll61%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
176 Must Do Concepts From Each Chapter & SA For CA Final Audit CA Ravi Taori. Ensure you Cover Them Properly. And do at least these concepts for weak chapters.
Best Strategy & Planner CA Final Audit Exams | CA Ravi Taori https://youtu.be/FjTRL76snHs
CA Final walo 📚🔥 Jai Sir, Pavan Sir aur Ravi Sir coming LIVE to solve all your queries for the upcoming CA Final May’26 exams. Agar aap Group 1 ya both groups ke liye appear kar rahe ho, then this session is for you ✅ Don’t miss this opportunity. 🕦 Today at 11:30 AM Guidance cum Q&A Session 🎥 Short video: https://youtube.com/shorts/BcvvfhRZ54w?si=JN7tbQexA6Jw7h6H Join LIVE here 👇 https://www.youtube.com/live/dxw…
Crush your fear of Bank & NBFC Audit | All Practical Questions with Summary | CA Final Audit | RT https://youtu.be/nP0YMD3qn6Y
Save Time | Dont Do ICAI MCQ Booklet Before Watching This | CA Final Audit | CA Ravi Taori https://youtu.be/EsPVHMO3WQo
50% Questions May Come From Here | CA Final Audit 150 Most Imp Question May 26 Exams https://youtu.be/W853Dja3kAY
😳17 Topics Contributed 70% Marks in Past 5 Attempts in CA Final Audit https://youtu.be/652D-PiFU_w
Free Giveaway For CA Final and CA Inter Students https://youtu.be/h342P8MVK_A
Free Certified Copy Evaluation For CA Final and CA Inter Audit https://youtube.com/shorts/cpSZyj5wBSE?si=zxjaP2mBnwYBIw4c
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cafinalvsmartacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Finally how was ca final audit ?
- Easy7%
- Medium26%
- Difficult7%
- Here just to see poll61%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Olymp_Trade_Signals_Quotex1 · 253,390
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 21 August 2026
@vsmartacademyofficial · 35,888
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
@sanidhyasaraf · 27,111
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💡CA Final Vsmart Academy Official” (@cafinalvsmartacademy), 12,610 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cafinalvsmartacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.