Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Callisto FX

Channel

Callisto FX

@callistofx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131,429subscribers

+7,067 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001563177374
TypeChannel
Username@callistofx
DescriptionWe trade live everyday on YouTube 🐳🐳 🚩 Consistency 🚩 Profitability 🚩 Transparency Callisto FX aims to shoot for the moon with clients, proving daily results, updates & edu. 📚Free Course and Resources: https://t.me/CallistoEdu Not financial advice
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/callistofx

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

124,360131,429127,894.57 August 2026 — 124,362 subscribers8 August 2026 — 124,442 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124,423 subscribers10 August 2026 — 124,360 subscribers11 August 2026 — 124,455 subscribers12 August 2026 — 124,459 subscribers13 August 2026 — 124,530 subscribers14 August 2026 — 124,834 subscribers16 August 2026 — 124,787 subscribers17 August 2026 — 124,798 subscribers18 August 2026 — 124,846 subscribers19 August 2026 — 124,832 subscribers20 August 2026 — 124,925 subscribers21 August 2026 — 125,046 subscribers22 August 2026 — 125,196 subscribers24 August 2026 — 125,221 subscribers25 August 2026 — 125,302 subscribers26 August 2026 — 125,421 subscribers27 August 2026 — 125,610 subscribers28 August 2026 — 125,828 subscribers29 August 2026 — 125,988 subscribers29 August 2026 — 125,949 subscribers30 August 2026 — 126,034 subscribers1 September 2026 — 126,267 subscribers2 September 2026 — 126,248 subscribers4 September 2026 — 126,572 subscribers6 September 2026 — 126,779 subscribers9 September 2026 — 127,324 subscribers12 September 2026 — 127,867 subscribers13 September 2026 — 127,811 subscribers15 September 2026 — 128,464 subscribers17 September 2026 — 129,124 subscribers28 September 2026 — 131,429 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net +7,067. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123,300–132,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 12:35131,429+2,305
17 Sept 2026, 21:18129,124+660
15 Sept 2026, 14:39128,464+653
13 Sept 2026, 23:41127,811-56
12 Sept 2026, 04:00127,867+543
9 Sept 2026, 21:35127,324+545
6 Sept 2026, 13:35126,779+207
4 Sept 2026, 00:59126,572+324
2 Sept 2026, 04:44126,248-19
1 Sept 2026, 02:04126,267+233
30 Aug 2026, 23:35126,034+85
29 Aug 2026, 22:24125,949-39
29 Aug 2026, 01:25125,988+160
28 Aug 2026, 02:57125,828+218
27 Aug 2026, 04:38125,610+189
26 Aug 2026, 06:55125,421+119
25 Aug 2026, 05:42125,302+81
24 Aug 2026, 08:24125,221+25
22 Aug 2026, 14:26125,196+150
21 Aug 2026, 06:45125,046first reading

Engagement

978 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.47%
avg views ÷ 131,429 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
600 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.816%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
600
of 978 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 583 of 600 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held978 (7 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total1,159,376
Reactions total9,342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈48,100
Videos
≈1,630
Links
≈6,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 04m
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,938 reactions across 945 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9,63564.5%
🔥2,97819.9%
💯3862.58%
👏3372.26%
🐳2881.93%
⚡2801.87%
😍2261.51%
🥰1951.31%
🎉1741.16%
😁1260.843%
❤‍🔥1140.763%
🤩850.569%
🍾540.361%
😘310.208%
🏆290.194%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 951 of the 978 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 978 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC716 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🟢778 PIPS BUYS LIVE SCALP (7,780 USD per lot) Signal called on LAST LONDON SESSION! BUYS Criterias met LIVE on stream: ♦️1HR bullish Internal OB formed. ♦️Retest of the bullish OB. ♦️Sweep of the 1HR & 15M low to capitalise on BUYS. When I send a signal, you take it, we both win together You could have made $7,780 USD on this trade!!! All you needed was my EXACT SIGNAL. (which we gave in Premium) Volume is ram…

❤2🔥1

30 Sept 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,120 views29 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

$700 START. $2,142.59 PROFIT . 🤯 Ad followed our trade calls and executed when it mattered. No fucking around. Just execution. Next session, we go again. Join the room and take the trades with us. 🔥

🔥17❤8🐳2💯2

30 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,650 views9 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

🟢252 Pips BUYS CAUGHT LIVE On This LONDON Broke down how it happened LIVE infront of 3,000+ viewers…You could have made 2,520 USD on this trade!!! All you needed was my EXACT SIGNAL. (which we sent in Premium) This is how every trade is taken, on stream or not, managed in real time. 🔗CLICK ME COPY MY SIGNALS FOR FREE

❤5🔥3🐳1

30 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC≈2,470 views9 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤4🐳3⚡2

30 Sept 2026, 09:31 UTC≈2,690 views11 reactionsread 30 September 2026

🇺🇸Post London Trade Log 🇺🇸: 🟢 + 126 Pips XAUUSD SELL 🟢 + 127 Pips XAUUSD SELL 🟢 + 252 Pips XAUUSD BUY 🟢 + 135 Pips XAUUSD SELL ⬆️(Click the links to see the ACTUAL trades sent HERE) Total: +640 pips secured today before NEW YORK 🤩 This is ON TOP of our 5,500 Pips we secured last WEEK! MORE SIGNALS INCOMING. 🚀 🔗COPY MY SIGNALS FOR FREE HERE

❤9🐳1🔥1

30 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,980 views19 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤11🔥6😁2

30 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,050 views40 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

⏰ IN 30 MINUTES ⏰ Premium members get access to the EXACT signals from FOUR MILLIONAIRE TRADERS 🔥 Not recaps. Not "here's what I would've done." The actual entries, called LIVE, while they take them. 🟢 Exact entries 🟢 Live trading streams 🟢 Watch the thesis, the setup and the execution happen in real time After this, "I don't know what to trade" isn't an excuse anymore. The only question left is whether you're a…

❤18❤‍🔥12🔥10

30 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,890 views17 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🟢 TP1 Hit, 50 Pips

❤9🔥5🥰2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 978 posts we hold for @callistofx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Callisto FX” (@callistofx), 131,429 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callistofx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.