Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Творческий Питер

Channel

Творческий Питер

@calllush

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,583subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066745190
TypeChannel
Username@calllush
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/calllush

Growth

3,5833,6373,6107 August 2026 — 3,637 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,637 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,635 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,628 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,618 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,609 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,607 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,605 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,597 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,583 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 31 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,575–3,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 11:563,583-14
2 Sept 2026, 06:533,597-8
30 Aug 2026, 07:523,605-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:083,607-2
24 Aug 2026, 08:373,609-9
20 Aug 2026, 07:343,618-10
16 Aug 2026, 20:583,628-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:183,635-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:313,637no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:033,637first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2727.8%
👏1818.6%
🎉1010.3%
🍾99.28%
👍88.25%
❤‍🔥55.15%
😍55.15%
🔥44.12%
custom 519068394535153507633.09%
😎33.09%
🥰22.06%
custom 519066097586643759911.03%
💔11.03%
🤩11.03%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 5 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @calllush. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC56 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🫤АУКЦИОН В ЭТИ ВЫХОДНЫЕ 🙂Рубрика - Аукцион питерских художников представляет в эти выходные: 🎨 Суббота с 12:00 до 20:00 Zean Zack «Поиск бога от первого лица» Размер: 50 см × 40 см Материалы: холст, акрил, тушь 2026 год 🎨 Воскресенье с 12:00 до 20:00 Татевосян Люсинэ Рубеновна «СОН» Размер: 50 см × 50 см Материалы и техника: бумага, цветная литография 2018 год -=Творческий Питер

👏4🔥3🤩1

7 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC83 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Версейс» — это не опечатка Вчера побывал на вернисаже персональной выставки Алины Корякиной «Версейс» в IRNBY ART совместно с Pop-Up Gallery. Название, кстати, не случайное. «Версейс» — отсылка к культовой сцене из фильма Пола Верховена «Шоугелз», где название Versace произносится с ошибкой. И уже здесь становится понятно, что выставка будет не совсем про «красивые картинки». Алина Корякина исследует женские обра

6🎉5🍾4🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC140 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Яндекс Музей Открытие выставки - "Пределы видимого" Интересно, что этим проектом музей открывает новое для себя направление Art & Science — когда художники работают вместе с учёными и технологиями, а произведение становится не просто объектом созерцания, а способом задать вопрос о том, как устроен окружающий нас мир. Главная тема выставки — попытка посмотреть на реальность шире человеческого восприятия. Мы привык

👏6🍾54🎉4🥰2custom 51906609758664375991

2 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC355 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Никита Кравель/"05.32" «Абстракция 1» Размер: 60 см × 80 см Материалы: холст, масляная краска, акриловая краска, масляная пастель, офсетная краска. 2025 год Оформление без рамы Работа находится в Санкт-Петербурге Никита Кравель — современный художник из Санкт-Петербурга, чье творчество сфокусировано вокруг мира флоры. Это не художественный выбор, а нечто врожденное: с самых ранних лет ему легко удавалось рисовать

13👍7👏7

1 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC391 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Татьяна Алмонд и Дмитрий Чайка «Нергал» (из серии «Халдейский ряд») Размер: 41 см х 51 см Материалы: репродукция портрета русского пианиста Константина Игумнова, художника Борис Кустодиев, 1923 год; пластелин, масляная пастель, googly wiggle eyes, бязь. 2025 год Оформление: shadow box ручной работы, оммаж обложке советского альбома репродукций Кустодиева (которая также была выполнена из бязи цвета солнечной пыли)

❤‍🔥5😍54😎3custom 51906839453515350763🎉1👍1👏1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @calllush. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Творческий Питер” (@calllush), 3,583 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/calllush.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.