📈 #PONS Pons, a token launch platform on the Robinhood Chain, generated $5.95 million in daily fees, setting a new all-time high and ranking fourth among all protocols.
🎉8👍3🔥2

Channel
@calls0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26,644subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002204072553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @calls0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/calls0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 26,644 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 26,645 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 26,644 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 26,643 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 26,644 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 26,645 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 26,646 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 26,647 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 26,648 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 26,646 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 26,648 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 26,649 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 26,648 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 26,650 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 26,652 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 26,651 | first reading |
345 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 345 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 677,668 |
| Reactions total | 11,356 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,099 reactions across 345 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,794 | 23.1% | |
| 🤔 | 2,507 | 20.7% | |
| 👀 | 972 | 8.03% | |
| 🎉 | 946 | 7.82% | |
| 🤯 | 782 | 6.46% | |
| 👏 | 609 | 5.03% | |
| 🔥 | 570 | 4.71% | |
| 🐳 | 382 | 3.16% | |
| 😢 | 345 | 2.85% | |
| 😱 | 337 | 2.79% | |
| 👎 | 326 | 2.69% | |
| 💯 | 267 | 2.21% | |
| ❤ | 244 | 2.02% | |
| 🤝 | 131 | 1.08% | |
| 🤬 | 112 | 0.926% | |
| 🤩 | 90 | 0.744% | |
| 😁 | 84 | 0.694% | |
| 💔 | 57 | 0.471% | |
| 😨 | 53 | 0.438% | |
| 👨💻 | 51 | 0.422% | |
| 26 further kinds | 440 | 3.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 345 of the 345 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,099 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 345 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📈 #PONS Pons, a token launch platform on the Robinhood Chain, generated $5.95 million in daily fees, setting a new all-time high and ranking fourth among all protocols.
🎉8👍3🔥2
💰 Ogle, a consultant at #WLFI, turned an initial investment of $4,997 into $5.4 million with #PONS, achieving a profit of 1,080 times his original investment. He initially purchased 10.607 million #PONS when its market capitalization was $470,000 and continues to hold onto it. 🧠 In the meantime, #PONS has surged by over 50% since yesterday. At 1:43 PM, it was among the top assets for spot purchases, and by 9:58 PM, …
🔥13🤯8😱4👏1💯1
💰 Ogle, a consultant for #WLFI, transformed an initial investment of $4,997 into $5.4 million through #PONS, achieving a profit of 1,080 times his original investment. He started by purchasing 10.607 million #PONS when the market capitalization was $470,000 and continues to hold onto it. 🧠 Meanwhile, #PONS has surged by over 50% since yesterday. At 13:43, it ranked among the top for spot purchases, and by 21:58, it …
🎉14👍6👏5🤩3
📊 #RWA Token Terminal: In about two months, Robinhood has transformed from having no issuers to becoming the largest issuer by the number of equity token holders. Currently, Robinhood has 862,800 holders, surpassing Binance bStocks, which has 827,200 holders.
👍11🔥5🎉1👏1
🇺🇸🕹 #regulation The Chairman of the SEC stated that he anticipates the Clarity Act will be approved this month.
👍17👏9🤔5
🔍🐳 Transactions involving whales and institutions with #HYPE: 1. The wallet 1.0x6436 acquired an additional 430,224 #HYPE, valued at $35.1 million. 2. A new wallet, 0xC5ca, transferred 94,149 #HYPE, worth $7.66 million, through FalconX. 3. Keith, who previously held 2.93 million #HYPE (valued at $163.37 million), sold his remaining 969,595 #HYPE for $79.18 million. 4. Multicoin sold another 10% of their #HYPE tokens…
🐳12🔥5🤔1
🤖 #WLD #AI OpenAI announced that it is working on systems to automatically shut down its AI if one of its agents behaves unexpectedly during a safety test. Read more here.
🤔12👍6👏3🗿1🤯1
If you had invested $1,000 fifteen years ago, it would now be worth: - Bitcoin (BTC): $8,970,000 - Nvidia: $735,000 - Tesla: $231,000 - Apple: $29,000 - S&P 500: $8,400 - Gold: $2,150
🤯19👍7👏5😱2
🇺🇸 #WLD #ETF The GrayScale Worldcoin ETF is registered in the state of Delaware.
🤔15👍8👏3💯3🤓1
📊 #BTC #ETH #ETF Yesterday, the total net outflow from spot BTC ETFs was approximately $101.1 million. The total net outflow from spot ETH ETFs was $48.2 million.
👍20🤔7😢5👎3💯2
📊 Santiment: There has been an increase in the number of new addresses over the past week compared to the first half of August.
👍17🤔8👏5😁4
🍒 Today's Digest and Tomorrow's Events - Click here for more information.
👍27👏12❤8🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 345 posts we hold for @calls0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stock Market & Crypto Calls” (@calls0), 26,644 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/calls0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.