🐲
custom 519531430234872911221❤2🔥2

Channel
@cardigansgaming_cs2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11,811subscribers
-1,116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002685816535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cardigansgaming_cs2 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cardigansgaming_cs2 |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 11,811 | -36 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 11,847 | -25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 11,872 | -55 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 11,927 | -63 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 11,990 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 12,001 | -37 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:28 | 12,038 | -190 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:48 | 12,228 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 12,254 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 12,260 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 12,286 | -28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 12,314 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 12,320 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 12,344 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 12,346 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 12,358 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 12,379 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 12,398 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 12,408 | -18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 12,426 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (20 June 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,225 |
| Reactions total | 120 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
508 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474608393450691188 | 322 | 63.4% | |
| 🔥 | 88 | 17.3% | |
| ❤ | 77 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5195314302348729112 | 21 | 4.13% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐲
custom 519531430234872911221❤2🔥2
Posted without readable text
custom 547460839345069118830❤6🔥4
ВОТ НА ЧЕМ ИГРАЕТ ОДИН ИЗ ЛУЧШИХ ИГРОКОВ EWC 2026 🔥 Смотрим сетап и настройки лучшего трансфера этого лета! Настройки мыши просты: 800 DPI и 1.15 Sensivity ⚙️ Настройки графики: ➡️Формат экрана: 4:3 ➡️Разрешение: 1280х1024 ➡️Режим масштабирования: Растянутый ➡️Яркость: 110% ➡️Повышенный контраст игроков: Вкл ➡️Вертикальная синхронизация: Выкл ➡️NVIDIA G-Sync: Выкл ➡️Низкая задержка NVIDIA Reflex: Вкл ➡️Макс. часто…
custom 547460839345069118813❤5🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤5custom 54746083934506911885🔥2
НЕОБЪЯСНИМО, НО ФАКТ 😨 ➡️ Кажется, после выхода обновы donk ждал нужный момент Немного статистики: ➡️Последние пять месяцев в 72,2 % случаев использовал именно M4A4 ➡️В групповой стадии 🎮 EWC 2026 не сделал ни одного фрага с M4A4, предпочитая «двадцатку» Вот и думай теперь, что это значит... 🪖 — New meta 🤩 Cardigans Gaming CS2
custom 547460839345069118820❤3🔥1
Posted without readable text
custom 54746083934506911888❤4🔥2
Posted without readable text
custom 547460839345069118825❤3🔥2
Cardigans Gaming CS2 pinned a photo
ГДЕ ПОИГРАТЬ ТУРНИРЫ НА ЭТОЙ НЕДЕЛЕ ⭐ 🎮 SkinClub JULYASSIC PARK stage 4 (1 -5 LVL Faceit) ОСНОВНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ: ➡️Формат турнира: Online ➡️Формат игр: Single-Elimination ➡️Призовой фонд: 150 $ в скинах ➡️Регистрация: до 24 июля, 18:15 по МСК Регистрация — ТУТ 📄 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🎮 SkinClub JULYASSIC PARK stage 4 (6 - 10 LVL Faceit) ОСНОВНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ: ➡️Формат турнира: Online ➡️Формат игр: Single-Elimination ➡️Призовой …
custom 547460839345069118810❤3🔥3
👾 Необъяснимо, но факт: M4A4 берут чаще именно на тир-1 ➡️XSE Pro League Guangzhou 2026 🔫🔫 вместо 🔫🔫 берут в 57.9 % случаев ➡️CCT 2026 Challengers Europe Series 4 🔫🔫 вместо 🔫🔫 берут в 42.6 % случаев А что используешь ты? 🪖 — M4A4 🔥 — M4A1-S
custom 547460839345069118849🔥20❤4
🎮 FACEIT запустили голосование за новую карту в 9 сезоне! 🪖 Следующий сезон стартует 5 августа и начнется с планового сброса ELO Проголосовать за vertigo — здесь 📄
custom 547460839345069118811❤4🔥2
ГДЕ ПОИГРАТЬ ТУРНИРЫ НА ЭТОЙ НЕДЕЛЕ №2 ⚠️ 🎮 Team Liquid Tidal Clash 51 ОСНОВНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ: ➡️Формат турнира: Online ➡️Формат игр: Single-Elimination ➡️Призовой фонд: 500 $ + 10 000 Faceit Points ➡️Регистрация: до 18 июля, 16:30 по МСК Регистрация — ТУТ 📄 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🎮 TopSkin Wingman Cup ОСНОВНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ: ➡️Формат турнира: Online ➡️Формат игр: Single-Elimination ➡️Призовой фонд: 500 $ ➡️Регистрация: до 18 июля…
custom 54746083934506911888🔥5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @cardigansgaming_cs2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Финал начнется совсем скоро! Кто победит? 🚨(Голосовать можно до 18:00 по МСК)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Второй полуфинал скоро начнется! Кто победит? 🛍 (Голосовать можно до 20:00 по МСК)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cardigans Gaming CS2” (@cardigansgaming_cs2), 11,811 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cardigansgaming_cs2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.