Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CARDIO-NOTES

Channel

CARDIO-NOTES

@cardionotesposts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,848subscribers

+2,287 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002185333092
TypeChannel
Username@cardionotesposts
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cardionotesposts

Growth

11,56113,84812,704.528 August 2026 — 11,561 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,561 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,328 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,467 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,702 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,751 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,774 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,802 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,825 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,848 subscribers28 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2,287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,218–14,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 03:3613,848+23
4 Sept 2026, 01:0013,825+23
2 Sept 2026, 14:5513,802+28
1 Sept 2026, 14:1413,774+23
31 Aug 2026, 15:2713,751+49
30 Aug 2026, 18:5713,702+235
29 Aug 2026, 16:5713,467+1,139
28 Aug 2026, 15:5712,328+767
28 Aug 2026, 11:5111,561no change
28 Aug 2026, 11:4511,561first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.9%
avg views ÷ 13,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,160
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.686%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held17 (17 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total16,320
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15780.1%
👍2412.2%
🔥136.63%
👎21.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈9,070 views69 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

45👍16🔥6👎2

3 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈11,900 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

2026 ACC/ACC ECDP for management of HFpEF

3 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈11,900 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

23👍3

17 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC≈7,320 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026

اختيار مضاد الصفائح في مرضى ال ACS النقطة الاولى كل المرضى بياخذوا اسبرين (ما لم يكن ممنوع) النقطة التانيه هنضيف واحد من ال P2Y12 inhibitors واحد من التلاته Clopidogrel Ticagrelor Prasugrel لو مريض ازمة قلبية، ACS و هيدخل قسطرة يبقى نضيف ال Ticagrelor or prasugrel يفضل عن ال Clopidogrel اللي هو البلافكس ودا مبني على ال PLATO trial TRITON-TIMI 38 trial اذا كان واحد من الاتنين مش متاح او ممنوع يتم استخدام البلاف

23

17 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC≈4,850 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Thromboembolism prophylaxis (e.g. with LMWH) is recommended in acute HF patients not already anticoagulated and with no contraindication to anticoagulation. #cardionotes

👍21

17 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC≈4,590 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

لو استخدمت Triple antithrombotic therapy or dual antithrombotic therapy وفيهم NOAC اللي ممكن تقلل جرعته هو ال Rivaroxaban or dabigatran ‏For both TAT and DAT regimens, the recommended doses for the NOACs are as follows: Apixaban 5 mg b.i.d., Dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg b.i.d., Edoxaban 60 mg o.d., Rivaroxaban 15 mg or 20 mg o.d. #cardionotes

3

17 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC≈3,740 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Diabetes mellitus Chronic kidney disease Systemic lupus erythematosus Rheumatoid arthritis Hypothyroidism دول اشهر الامراض اللي بترفع الدهون الثلاثية #cardionotes

5👍3

17 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC≈3,980 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

β-blockers, preferably non-selective β-blockers (nadolol or propranolol), are recommended in patients with Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) and documented QT interval prolongation to reduce the risk of arrhythmic events. #cardionotes

3

17 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC≈2,640 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

The maximal daily dose for i.v. loop diuretics is generally considered to be: * Furosemide: 400–600 mg/day (i.v.) * Up to 1000 mg/day may be considered in patients with severely impaired kidney function. #cardionotes

4

17 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 2 September 2026

When AV surgery is indicated Concomitant replacement of the aortic root or ascending aorta should be considered if the maximal diameter is ≥45 mm and the predicted surgical risk is low. #cardionotes

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cardionotesposts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MRCP Part 1 Materials 2025
@mrcp1material · 45,141
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Ahmed Elashmawy 🐢🩺
@Ahmed_Elashmawy00 · 37,856
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CARDIO-NOTES” (@cardionotesposts), 13,848 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cardionotesposts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.