Channel
@carnewD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,192subscribers
+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002207882313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @carnewD |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/carnewD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 10,192 | +33 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 10,159 | +38 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 10,121 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:05 | 10,122 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:06 | 10,126 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 10,127 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 10,130 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 10,132 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 10,129 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 10,132 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 10,135 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 10,139 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 10,142 | +9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 10,133 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 10,135 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 10,138 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 10,135 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 10,134 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 10,137 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 10,131 | first reading |
124 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 124 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39,552 |
| Reactions total | 268 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
436 reactions across 108 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 116 | 26.6% | |
| ❤ | 95 | 21.8% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 7.34% | |
| 🤩 | 32 | 7.34% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 6.42% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 3.44% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 3.44% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 3.21% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 2.98% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 2.75% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 2.06% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 2.06% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.38% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.917% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.688% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.688% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.688% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.688% | |
| 9 further kinds | 14 | 3.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of the Kia EV9 charged for a couple of dollars and received a bill for almost $16,000 — the charging station decided that the car had been parked there for 15 months. In reality, the electric car received only 4.91 kWh of energy — such a charge should have cost less than $3. However, due to a glitch, the session that started in May 2025 was only closed in August 2026. The station calculated the payment by…
😁3👍2
The Chinese have turned the roof of an electric car into a solar power station: 400 kWh of free energy per year. The company Hongqi has unveiled a prototype of the EHS7 crossover with a panoramic roof made from perovskite (an alternative to traditional silicon). What it offers: up to 300 watts of power in sunlight and around 400 kWh per year. This is enough to power the car's air conditioner, refrigerator, and secu…
💯1
🚘 New technologies : a car that self-heals after an accident.
💯1
Posted without readable text
❤3
BMW has brought out the new X7 at the Nürburgring — it seems the Germans are testing the top version M60 with a V8. The prototype features four exhaust pipes, and the crossover itself has become noticeably more high-tech than the current model: a new iDrive with a panoramic display, a more luxurious interior, and equipment in the spirit of the new 7 Series are expected. Under the hood, the M60 may retain a 4.4-lite…
👍2
Porsche has released the most beautiful gaming steering wheel — an exact replica of the steering wheel from the 911 GT3 RS. It was developed together with MOZA: an aluminum base, microfiber, carbon paddles, and even a working horn. The price has not been announced yet, but it is expected to be around $400. The 911 GT3 RS, which you can actually afford. 🚙 ⭐️ Discover the best Telegram channels:➡️@Topchannels10
👍3
Hyundai will conduct a large-scale update of its model range — by 2030, the company will release more than 100 new and updated vehicles. For the first time, Hyundai will introduce a frame mid-size pickup, Genesis is preparing a hybrid with a range of over 1000 km, and the sports lineup N will be significantly expanded. The goal is also ambitious: Genesis aims to sell in 40+ countries, and increase the sales of N mo…
🔥1
A 30-year-old Toyota has almost rotted down to a constructor's state — the body is already held together with belts, yet the engine still starts calmly. Now it’s clear why they aren’t replaced for 30 years. 🚙 ⭐️ Discover the best Telegram channels:➡️@Topchannels10
🔥3👏2🤔1🤯1
⚠️The first day at the new job...
🤯4😁4❤1
Porsche has released the most affordable racing 911 — the new 911 Challenge. The model is built on the base of the 911 GT3: a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six engine delivers 515 horsepower, paired with a 7-speed PDK and rear-wheel drive. The interior has had sound insulation and unnecessary trim removed, with the addition of a safety cage, racing seat, and fire suppression system. The 911 Challenge is intend…
❤5❤🔥2🥰2
Lexus is preparing a 600-horsepower RX Morizo RR— a performance crossover that has already been spotted testing in Europe. During the tests, a prototype with wide wheel arches, lowered suspension, and large Brembo brakes was observed. According to rumors, the RX Morizo RR version will feature a new 2.0-liter Toyota turbo engine and two electric motors. The model is expected to be released in 2028. 🚙 ⭐️ Discover t…
👍1
A 1973 Camaro has been put up for auction, transformed into a 680-horsepower monster for SEMA. The project was built by D&Z Customs: under the hood is a 7.2-liter V8 with 680 horsepower and 773 Nm, 6-speed manual transmission, rear-wheel drive, reinforced suspension, and powerful Wilwood brakes. The body features an aggressive body kit, a huge spoiler, and a bright green paint job. The car was assembled back in 201…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @carnewD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@carnewD edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚘 All about cars and motorcycles. Accidents, news, maintenance, repair, crashes.” (@carnewD), 10,192 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carnewD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.