Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REVELAR

Channel

REVELAR

@casandooverbo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

50,591subscribers

-204 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001361657579
TypeChannel
Username@casandooverbo
DescriptionGeopolítica, política internacional, religião e mitologias, espionagem e assuntos correlatos
Created5 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/casandooverbo

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

50,56850,81750,692.56 August 2026 — 50,795 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,776 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,758 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,739 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,729 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,706 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,699 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,681 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,642 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,613 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,603 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,581 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,568 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,700 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,790 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,798 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,764 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,770 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,790 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,793 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,797 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,813 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,817 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,809 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,785 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,776 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,784 subscribers5 September 2026 — 50,773 subscribers8 September 2026 — 50,724 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,727 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,724 subscribers14 September 2026 — 50,695 subscribers16 September 2026 — 50,678 subscribers18 September 2026 — 50,653 subscribers25 September 2026 — 50,591 subscribers50,5916 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -204. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,531–50,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:2150,591-62
18 Sept 2026, 19:2050,653-25
16 Sept 2026, 12:3950,678-17
14 Sept 2026, 13:5750,695-29
13 Sept 2026, 02:3750,724-3
11 Sept 2026, 03:3650,727+3
8 Sept 2026, 08:4150,724-49
5 Sept 2026, 06:1550,773-11
3 Sept 2026, 09:3250,784+8
2 Sept 2026, 04:5250,776-9
1 Sept 2026, 05:2550,785-24
31 Aug 2026, 03:3650,809-8
30 Aug 2026, 05:4850,817+4
29 Aug 2026, 04:2450,813+16
28 Aug 2026, 02:0450,797+4
27 Aug 2026, 05:0750,793+3
26 Aug 2026, 06:4450,790+20
25 Aug 2026, 05:4650,770+6
24 Aug 2026, 06:5250,764-34
22 Aug 2026, 12:0850,798first reading

Engagement

181 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 50,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,870
116 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 181 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held181 (1 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total1,144,680
Reactions total52,270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,290
Videos
≈3,110
Links
≈850

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 07m
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

91,361 reactions across 181 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍60,54766.3%
😐17,03718.6%
❤7,1677.84%
👏6,6107.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 181 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91,361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 181 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
170
across the posts below
Posts paid on
49
of 181 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @casandooverbo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 181 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC≈4,400 views147 reactionsread 25 September 2026

(AO VIVO) ALTERA DE ATAQUE - EUROPA https://www.youtube.com/live/HpISxR6ibiM?is=T2xFjuJL-OEwnaWT

👍116😐25❤6

24 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC≈4,030 views306 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Isto era inimaginável há um ano atrás. Estamos na fase de "multiplicação geométrica" da ciência. Daqui a um ano a IA passará a imprimir alucinações em quem estiver inserido de cabeça neste universo digital.

😐185👍103👏11❤7

24 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈4,980 views423 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026

Infelizmente muitos sites que trazem informações preciosas estão sendo apagados da internet e todo o seu conteúdo sumindo. Alguns deles pelo fato de os autores terem falecido. Outros não sei o motivo. Aconteceu muito este ano, mais do que na média dos últimos anos.

👍295😐118👏8❤2

24 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC≈7,020 views227 reactionsread 25 September 2026

THE ECONOMIST E A CORRIDA PELO EXTERMÍNIO HUMANO https://youtu.be/fF7fRHytn64

👍189😐28❤10

24 Sept 2026, 08:18 UTC≈7,750 views433 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026
Video

As eleições de novembro farão as pessoas pensarem que a IA será controlada, talvez a reunião de Xi e Trump hoje também faça. Mas, não será.

👍355😐67❤11

23 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC≈7,750 views208 reactionsread 25 September 2026

(AO VIVO) THE ECONOMIST - PROFECIA DO TERREMOTO SE CUMPRIU https://www.youtube.com/live/DaKhLwtTBOE?is=0D_1vlMy9b3eBq-O

👍174😐23❤11

23 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈8,550 views424 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👏242👍112❤53😐17

23 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈8,730 views358 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026
Photo

ATENÇÃO! Pela primeira e única vez, liberarei um ACESSO GRATUITO DE 30 DIAS para as lives fechadas de toda quarta-feira, as 16:30 h, no grupo MUNDO DESCONHECIDO. TEMA DE HOJE: SACERDOTES DE MOLOCH - O VERDADEIRO MÁGICO DE OZ Os 30 dias gratuitos se darão exclusivamente através de inscrição NESTE LINK: https://pay.hotmart.com/P91989199B?off=7wbxai24 Não há obrigatoriedade de continuar, você poderá cancelar após o…

👍241❤65👏39😐13

23 Sept 2026, 03:28 UTC≈9,570 views538 reactions2 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Trump diz que o termo "Inteligência Artificial" deve ser renomeado para: 1. Inteligência Superior (SI) 2. Inteligência Extrema (EI) 3. Inteligência Suprema (SI) Ele também lança uma enquete para selecionar um novo nome. A besta do fim dos tempos que emerge do mar, elevará a IA ao mais alto nível e a exaltará acima dO Criador? O Anticristo e o Falso Profeta promoveriam a IA e fariam todos adorá-la, respeitá-la, re…

👍392😐117❤23👏6

23 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC≈8,570 views506 reactions2 Starsread 25 September 2026
Video

As pessoas tentando me convencer a votar no “menos pior”.

👍329😐100👏46❤31

22 Sept 2026, 21:05 UTC≈9,300 views501 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

Trump está liberando armas escalares de tecnologia secreta contra o Irã? OVNIS e Orbs de plasma como estes estão sendo avistados nos céus daquele país.

👍321😐162❤12👏6

22 Sept 2026, 19:46 UTC≈9,520 views633 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

Eu não sei nem se pode ser real algo assim. Estes pais estão muito felizes de receberem uma ligação de Trump e serem convidados para uma cerimônia na casa Branca em homenagem ao filho morto nos ataques contra o Irã. Isto é o que eu chamo de idolatria. O homem manda seu filho para a morte e você o agradece por isso, tremendo de emoção por falar com ele. O ideal seria Trump ter dito: Parabéns, seu filho foi morto p…

👍394😐181👏32❤26

Showing the 12 most recent of 181 posts we hold for @casandooverbo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@casandooverbo edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Sept 2026, 22:01 UTCAnonymous Poll2,440 voters approx.

Esses dias o governante mohr criticou os lixeiros, dizendo que exercem um trabalho “inferior”, ou algo do tipo. Mas, responda com sinceridade: o que faria mais falta ao país?

  1. 3 meses sem nossos governantes6%
  2. 3 dias sem recolhimento de lixo95%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 181 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

O INFORMANTE
@oinformanteof · 161,716
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
Fim dos Tempos | Notícias - Brasil - Geopolítica
@fimdostemposbrasil · 29,253
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 8 September 2026
Hoje no Mundo Militar - Canal
@hojeno_mundomilitar · 90,212
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Prof. Danuzio Neto - OSINT, Geopolítica e Atualidades (Intel BR - News)
@profdanuzioneto · 121,313
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
CARLOS BOLSONARO
@bolsonarocarlos · 109,611
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1
@jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,061,570
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Nikolas Ferreira
@nikolasferreira · 192,070
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Buzz News 🇧🇷 Brasil
@buzznews_br · 29,321
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
FreedomNews 🇺🇸🇧🇷🌎🌍🌏
@freedomnewsforyou · 30,232
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 7 September 2026
Revista Oeste
@revistaoesteoficial · 31,610
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
O Despertar II✨️®️👽🛸👮‍♂️
@odespertarreserva · 26,208
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 September 2026
Canal ARTE DA GUERRA
@canalartedaguerra · 27,449
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
CENTRAL GEOPOLÍTICA | INTEL & DEFESA
@CentralGeopolitica · 26,585
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
Gustavo Gayer
@gusgayer · 30,733
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Telegram Brasil
@TelegramBR · 115,462
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
Bia Kicis Oficial
@biakicisoficial · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
FLÁVIO BOLSONARO
@senadorflaviobolsonaro · 86,151
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Te Atualizei Oficial
@canalteatualizei · 30,692
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Jornal da Cidade Online
@jornaldacidadeonline · 30,433
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
APOIO AO MARÇAL | FAZ O Ⓜ️ 2️⃣8️⃣
@MarcalPorSp28 · 74,600
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
InfoMoney
@infomoney_noticias · 94,110
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REVELAR” (@casandooverbo), 50,591 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/casandooverbo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.