Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⲕᥲᥴᥴᥲⲏⲇρᥲ ⳝᥱ᥈᥈.🦇

Channel

ⲕᥲᥴᥴᥲⲏⲇρᥲ ⳝᥱ᥈᥈.🦇

@cassandrebell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

219subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002508551826
TypeChannel
Username@cassandrebell
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cassandrebell

Growth

217220218.524 August 2026 — 217 subscribers31 August 2026 — 220 subscribers18 September 2026 — 219 subscribers21924 August 202618 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 25 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 217–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:20219-1
31 Aug 2026, 20:37220+3
24 Aug 2026, 23:33217first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 219 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
64.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held18 (24 June 202623 August 2026)
Views total25
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,024 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523787778473437480736335.4%
custom 528732884847455288432932.1%
custom 546564662206507061327927.2%
custom 5334518474494471917535.18%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,024 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cassandrebell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC25 views16 reactionsread 24 August 2026

А давайте вы немного будете поактивнее на последних постах. Вам не сложно, а мне приятно. 🤩

custom 54656466220650706138custom 52378777847343748074custom 52873288484745528844

22 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC47 views35 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 528732884847455288416custom 52378777847343748079custom 54656466220650706139custom 53345184744944719171

20 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC65 views36 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523787778473437480717custom 546564662206507061310custom 52873288484745528849

17 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC100 views47 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 546564662206507061317custom 523787778473437480714custom 528732884847455288412custom 53345184744944719174

15 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC101 views52 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523787778473437480720custom 528732884847455288417custom 546564662206507061315

13 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC137 views61 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523787778473437480723custom 546564662206507061319custom 528732884847455288416custom 53345184744944719173

10 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC185 views66 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 528732884847455288428custom 523787778473437480721custom 533451847449447191717

8 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC191 views71 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523787778473437480728custom 528732884847455288422custom 546564662206507061319custom 53345184744944719172

4 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC226 views64 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Официально заявляю, что этот брелок лучшее, что случалось со мной в жизни. 😂

custom 528732884847455288426custom 523787778473437480721custom 546564662206507061317

26 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC256 views67 reactions3 Starsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Я люблю прекрасных готесс. 🌺

custom 528732884847455288427custom 523787778473437480719custom 546564662206507061317custom 53345184744944719174

23 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC320 views66 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Скетчевый гифт для моей любимой старосты. 🤩

custom 546564662206507061326custom 523787778473437480719custom 528732884847455288417custom 53345184744944719174

15 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC322 views39 reactionsread 24 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 523787778473437480716custom 528732884847455288413custom 546564662206507061310

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cassandrebell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ⲕᥲᥴᥴᥲⲏⲇρᥲ ⳝᥱ᥈᥈.🦇” (@cassandrebell), 219 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cassandrebell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.