Channel
@castleby_vote
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
358subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001853799057 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @castleby_vote |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/castleby_vote |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 358 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 354 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 355 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 349 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 346 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 343 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 343 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 85.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итоги оценки компании «РТЛ Альянс» для инвестиций Мультимодальный экспедитор бурно рос в последние годы. Опрос показывает выраженно негативное восприятие. Сумма негатива (1–2) составляет 50,9%, что втрое выше доли позитива 16%. Наибольшая доля участников (35,8%) оценили компанию как «посредственную с высокими рисками» 📊 Результаты опроса: * позитив на (4–5) баллов: 16,1% * нейтрально на (3) балла: 33,0% * негатив н…
👍2
Итоги оценки компании «Кредитон» для инвестиций Сеть ломбардов родом из Молодечно насчитывает 15 точек. Опрос показывает позитивное восприятие. Сумма позитива (4–5) составляет 46,7%, что превышает долю негатива 18,7%. Однако наибольшая доля участников (34,6%) отнесли компанию к «середнячкам с рисками» 📊 Результаты опроса: * позитив на (4–5) баллов: 46,7% * нейтрально на (3) балла: 34,6% * негатив на (1–2) балла: 18…
👍3
Итоги оценки компании «АРЛЕКС» для инвестиций Производителю торгового оборудования 33 года, многие из которых он минимально прибылен. Результаты опроса нейтральны с уклоном в негатив, составивший 42,4%, что более чем втрое выше доли позитива 11,1%. Наибольшая доля (46,5%) отнесли компанию к «середнячкам с рисками» 📊 Результаты опроса: * позитив на (4–5) баллов: 11,1% * нейтрально на (3) балла: 46,5% * негатив на (1…
👍1🔥1
Оцените по 5-ти балльной шкале компанию "РТЛ Альянс" с целью покупки её токенов
Оцените по 5-ти балльной шкале компанию "Кредитон" с целью покупки её токенов
Оцените по 5-ти балльной шкале компанию "АРЛЕКС" с целью покупки её токенов
❗️На этой неделе проведем заключительные опросы весенне-летнего "сезона" по оценке компаний-эмитентов
Итоги оценки компании «ОРО-Золото» для инвестиций Розничная торговля ювелирными изделиями в 13-ти торговых объектах. Результаты сдержанно-настороженные. Наибольшая доля (38,2%) отнесли компанию к «середнячкам с рисками», при этом доля негатива (42,1%) значительно превышает долю позитива (19,8%) 📊 Результаты опроса: * позитив на (4–5) баллов: 19,8% * нейтрально на (3) балла: 38,2% * негатив на (1–2) балла: 42,1% 📉 …
Итоги оценки компании «Дилмаркет» для инвестиций Эмитент из сферы оптовой торговли импортными товарами - поставки в сети стройматериалов. Результаты показывают негативное восприятие. Сумма негатива (1–2) составляет 53,6%, что вдвое выше доли позитива (19,6%). Наибольшая доля участников (34,1%) оценили компанию как «посредственную с высокими рисками» 📊 Результаты опроса: * позитив на (4–5) баллов: 19,6% * нейтрально…
Итоги оценки компании «Альтагамма» для инвестиций Эмитент 20 лет на рынке керамической плитки, развивает розничную сеть в т.ч под ТМ "ПлиткаХИТ". Результаты показывают негативное восприятие. Сумма негатива (1–2) составляет 50%, что втрое выше доли позитива (16,7%). Наибольшая доля участников (37,8%) оценили компанию как «посредственную с высокими рисками» 📊 Результаты опроса: * позитив на (4–5) баллов: 16,7% * нейт…
Оцените по 5-ти балльной шкале компанию "ОРО-Золото" с целью покупки её токенов
Оцените по 5-ти балльной шкале компанию "Дилмаркет" с целью покупки её токенов
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @castleby_vote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Опросы об эмитентах | Покупай с умом | Finstore / FainEX / Bynex” (@castleby_vote), 358 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/castleby_vote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.