Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cat 2025 material backup channel

Channel

Cat 2025 material backup channel

@cat2025materials1

Not marked by Telegram, checked 20 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,154subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002217687904
TypeChannel
Username@cat2025materials1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cat2025materials1

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,0926,1546,12318 August 2026 — 6,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,093 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,107 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,106 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,114 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,120 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,131 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,132 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,130 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,154 subscribers18 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,083–6,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 22:006,154+24
12 Sept 2026, 20:006,130-2
9 Sept 2026, 07:576,132+1
4 Sept 2026, 01:386,131+11
31 Aug 2026, 11:356,120+6
28 Aug 2026, 20:596,114+8
25 Aug 2026, 20:566,106-1
22 Aug 2026, 11:186,107+14
19 Aug 2026, 09:466,093+1
18 Aug 2026, 23:306,092first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC554 viewsread 18 August 2026

Hey CAT Aspirants, let’s talk about a major VARC plateau. 📊 Many of you are solving dozens of RCs every week, checking the right/wrong answers, and hoping your accuracy magically improves. But doing more of the same won't help if you don't understand HOW you are reading. Are you failing because of slow reading speed? Misinterpreting the author's tone? Falling for specific trap options in inference questions? This

17 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Most CAT Aspirants Solve RCs. Very Few Actually Improve. If your VARC score has been stuck despite solving passage after passage, the problem may not be your effort—it may be your practice method. With AuctorRC, you don't just solve Reading Comprehension passages. You discover: ✅ Why you got an answer wrong ✅ Which RC skills are holding you back ✅ How your accuracy changes over time ✅ Where you lose marks in inf

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cat2025materials1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MBA CAT Exam PDF GMAT
@CAT_MBA_Exam_PDF_GMAT · 76,578
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 19 August 2026
MBA Pathshala
@mba_pathshala · 62,615
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
MBA Wallah
@pwmbawallah · 39,752
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 31 August 2026
Data Interpretation DI ( SBI IBPS RRB PO CLERK Mains )
@IBPS_SBI_PO_data_interpretation · 23,893
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 September 2026
English Grammar Vocabulary Quiz Bank SBI PO CLERK For UGC Mp UPSC,CSAT,SSC, BANK,NET ™
@Banking_IBPS_PO_English_Grammar · 78,257
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
CFA LEVEL 1
@CFAL1_FREE · 36,507
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
UPSC - Gaursepadho
@gaursepadho · 32,746
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
RBI SEBI NABARD GRADE A B GA Exam
@RBI_SEBI_NABARD_Grade_B_A_GA · 44,922
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
UPSC PRELIMS MCQs
@csecrackupsc · 54,144
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cat 2025 material backup channel” (@cat2025materials1), 6,154 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cat2025materials1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.