Channel
@catikk_vh7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003735793436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @catikk_vh7 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 23 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/catikk_vh7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 24 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:26 | 23 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 22 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 23 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 22 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 22 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 26.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🎀[AnnyaMax post]🎀 «Сомневаешься, подбрось монетку если тебе не понравился вариант, значит ты уже все решил.» Сдт: @twizzle_trouble @kseniasinit @figureskatesstiker #АннаЩербакова #эдит Реакции и пересылки приветствуются ______________________________________________ Буст✨
Ассоциации для @catikk_vh7 Спасибо,что поучаствовали
Video, posted without a caption
Брошу семью, сына и мужа Буду с тобой в пекло и в стужу Рядом шагать и покорять Японию мать ⚡️// #ES #color
❤🔥2💘1🕊1
ооо.. Нас 25! Спасибо всем огромное 🙏🏻
А ᴄ ᴄ ᴏ ц и ᴀ ц и и 📤 от миро 🤩 Я буду ассоциациировать вас с рандомной вещью (это может быть все что угодно,начиная с ключей заканчивая холодильником),эрой билли айлиш,сериалом/фильмом/мультиком,шипом 🤎для участия - ⁰¹ подписка на @mirl33z ⁰² пересыл в канал/5 пч + юз канала Мест 7/8🤲
Мое любимое болеро 🙏🏻 sdt: @lunar_xm, @malinaoffi, @seriwsx @fgrsktng, @kamiquenn16
#edit
Хэдканоны Петр Гуменник/Евгений Семененко 1.Петя абсолютно не умеет злиться на Женю Семененко. Вообще. Никак. Это его суперсила и его проклятие одновременно На самом деле Пётр Гуменник — человек эмоциональный. Он умеет злиться. На всех. Кроме Жени. С Женей это не работает. Петя пробовал. Честно. Однажды Женя случайно задел его локтем на тренировке — больно, прямо в ребро. Петя развернулся, готовый сказать что-то …
Ассоциация для @catikk_vh7 ✨
-🕊 ⚡️// #CL #edit #am scp: @f1cuts
👀4🕊3🙏3🍓2
кароч щас жестко в поте лица монтирую эдит
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @catikk_vh7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@catikk_vh7 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“catikk/рест” (@catikk_vh7), 24 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catikk_vh7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.