Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Котизмъ

Channel

Котизмъ

@catizm

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,485subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002800228
TypeChannel
Username@catizm
Created31 October 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/catizm

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Котизм — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

8,4858,5068,495.55 August 2026 — 8,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,502 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,503 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,498 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,496 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,493 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,497 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,499 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,496 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,491 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,485 subscribers5 August 20262 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 27 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,482–8,509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:588,485-6
30 Aug 2026, 08:448,491-5
26 Aug 2026, 23:168,496-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:158,499+2
20 Aug 2026, 22:248,497+4
18 Aug 2026, 07:418,493-3
15 Aug 2026, 16:258,496-2
12 Aug 2026, 04:538,498-5
9 Aug 2026, 11:328,503+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:108,502-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:028,506no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:148,506first reading

Engagement

170 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 8,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
859
150 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 170 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held170 (3 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total128,812
Reactions total10,585
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 18s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,215 reactions across 158 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,06645.2%
😁2,30820.6%
🥰1,94517.3%
🤣6786.05%
😍3573.18%
🔥2262.02%
👍1991.77%
😢1891.69%
😱1060.945%
👎500.446%
👏440.392%
🥱270.241%
🤔120.107%
🤬80.071%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 170 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 170 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @catizm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 170 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC653 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥰4214😍13😁11

27 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC678 views57 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

42😍11🔥3😁1

27 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC769 views85 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ощущение теплого котика рядом с тобой ни с чем не сравнимо. Когда он устраивается рядом, тихо мурлычет, прижимается к тебе, и вдруг становится так спокойно и хорошо. Наверное, это одно из самых простых и настоящих человеческих счастий. Просто теплый котик рядом. И больше ничего не нужно

57🥰20👍8

27 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC775 views64 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Лежит, сидит и стоит одновременно.

40😁14😍8🥰2

27 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC784 views57 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

С добрым утром! ☺️

🥰3420😁3

26 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC830 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

В незнакомых местах коты очень осторожны, к краю крыши буквально подползают, чтобы посмотреть вниз и отойти. А выпадают они из своих окон. Потеряв бдительность в знакомой обстановке...

😱408👍4🥰3😢2😁1

26 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC907 views81 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Переиграл

🤣52😁1210😢5🥰2

26 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,100 views96 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🔞 Видео не для слабонервных: на мужчину напала целая стаей разъярённых зверей К сожалению, эта видеозапись стала последней, которую он успел сделать сразу перед тем, как бесследно исчезнуть

🤣4128🥰15😁5😱3👍1👎1🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC870 views60 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣3321👎4🥰2

26 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC872 views54 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥰2518😱5🤣3🤬2👎1

26 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC861 views60 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁3712👍11

26 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC933 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁4912🥰10😱6

Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @catizm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бляцкие коты
@cats_cats · 82,587
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Мир и Животные
@video2 · 36,285
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Котизм
@catism · 33,483
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Котизмъ” (@catizm), 8,485 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catizm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.