Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Красота со смыслами

Channel

Красота со смыслами

@catkin_russia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

231subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001530264340
TypeChannel
Username@catkin_russia
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/catkin_russia

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

231254242.58 August 2026 — 254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 249 subscribers8 August 2026 — 249 subscribers15 August 2026 — 235 subscribers22 August 2026 — 232 subscribers30 August 2026 — 233 subscribers8 September 2026 — 231 subscribers8 August 20268 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 31 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–257 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 01:38231-2
30 Aug 2026, 08:47233+1
22 Aug 2026, 13:34232-3
15 Aug 2026, 18:04235-14
8 Aug 2026, 09:32249no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:43249-5
8 Aug 2026, 04:16254first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1834.0%
❤1528.3%
👍1120.8%
😍713.2%
👏23.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC10 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚 Книга на выходные: «Цирцея» — Мадлен Миллер Если хочется истории о сильной женщине, которая не спасает мир, а учится выбирать себя, — эта книга станет идеальным чтением. Мадлен Миллер переосмыслила древнегреческий миф и рассказала историю Цирцеи от ее лица. Из второстепенной героини «Одиссеи» она превращается в главного персонажа: уязвимого, любопытного, ошибающегося и постепенно обретающего собственный голос. Э…

❤2👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC21 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨ Памела Андерсон снова появилась на обложке Vogue — и снова удивила нас За последние несколько лет мы привыкли видеть Памелу практически без макияжа. Ее естественные выходы стали частью нового образа актрисы. Но для августовского Vogue Australia она решила сделать исключение. «Я какое-то время ходила почти без макияжа — мне это нравилось. Но это же Vogue. Давайте накрасим меня и просто немного повеселимся», — сказ…

👍2🔥2😍2

7 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👁️ Почему люди вообще начали подчеркивать глаза и ресницы? Оказывается, изначально это было связано не только с красотой. Первые свидетельства использования косметики для глаз относятся к Древнему Египту. Около 5 тысяч лет назад мужчины и женщины наносили на веки и ресницы темный кохль — смесь на основе минералов, сажи и других природных компонентов. Но делали это не только ради выразительного взгляда. Египтяне ве…

❤4👍1😍1

7 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC28 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. Светлана (@Svetla_Navodnichaya) ✔️Проверить результаты

🔥5👏2😍1

Signed Randomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]

6 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC30 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🖤 История продолжается — теперь уже в современных формулах. Сегодня тушь — это не только выразительный взгляд, но и комфорт в течение дня. CATKIN CHIC LUXURY MASCARA C01 сочетает насыщенный черный пигмент, уходовую формулу с 8 растительными экстрактами, витамином Е и натуральными восками и современные термотехнологии 🔥

🔥5❤2👍2

6 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC27 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👁️ История туши: от древности до современных формул Тушь — один из самых привычных продуктов в косметичке. Но ее история началась задолго до появления красивых флаконов и силиконовых щеточек. ✨ Древний Египет Около 4 тысяч лет назад египтяне уже подкрашивали ресницы и веки кохлем — смесью измельченных минералов и сажи. Причем делали это не только ради красоты: считалось, что такой состав помогает защитить глаза от …

😍3❤2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC29 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Румяна под глазами — прием, который снова в тренде На этом образе румяна нанесены высоко, практически под нижним веком, а затем мягко растушеваны к вискам. Эта техника пришла из азиатского макияжа и сегодня часто встречается на красных дорожках и в бьюти-съемках. В отличие от классической схемы, где румяна располагают на яблочках щек или ниже скул, здесь цвет поднимают выше. За счет этого лицо выглядит более свежим…

🔥3❤2👍2

5 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨ Кажется, у Зендеи есть суперспособность — делать любой макияж предметом обсуждения После эффектного выхода на премьере «Одиссеи» актриса снова оказалась в центре внимания, на этот раз благодаря образу для лондонской премьеры нового фильма о Человеке-пауке. За макияж отвечала команда Charlotte Tilbury, поэтому весь образ был создан средствами бренда. И хотя список включает больше десятка продуктов, больше всего на…

❤3👍2🔥2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @catkin_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Красота со смыслами” (@catkin_russia), 231 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catkin_russia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.