Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
12,800 average views per post against 11,850 subscribers — an engagement rate of 107.6%. Across the 25,150 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.63% and 22.7%, with a median of 11.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (5 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Posts measured
12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
153,030
Mature posts only
107.6% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 4 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 29 days, net +559. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,207–11,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 16:19
11,850
+37
2 Sept 2026, 07:04
11,813
+41
1 Sept 2026, 05:43
11,772
+15
31 Aug 2026, 04:16
11,757
+25
30 Aug 2026, 04:34
11,732
+16
29 Aug 2026, 06:47
11,716
+51
28 Aug 2026, 04:55
11,665
+14
27 Aug 2026, 01:39
11,651
+26
26 Aug 2026, 00:54
11,625
+27
24 Aug 2026, 23:33
11,598
+41
23 Aug 2026, 10:15
11,557
+36
21 Aug 2026, 21:26
11,521
+33
20 Aug 2026, 14:12
11,488
+16
19 Aug 2026, 16:42
11,472
+26
18 Aug 2026, 18:55
11,446
+17
17 Aug 2026, 17:57
11,429
+17
16 Aug 2026, 15:37
11,412
+22
14 Aug 2026, 23:28
11,390
+20
13 Aug 2026, 14:17
11,370
+8
12 Aug 2026, 15:58
11,362
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
107.6%
avg views ÷ 11,850 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
28 (4 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
153,030
Reactions total
2,291
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
6,380 reactions across 28 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,008
47.1%
👍
2,316
36.3%
🤔
491
7.70%
😁
341
5.34%
👎
123
1.93%
😢
62
0.972%
🤬
39
0.611%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
154
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 28 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @catmoderne. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Только я вчера сказал, что Зеленский удивительно долго не мог родить новые нарративы и просто молчит, сегодня вечером он выступил в жанре, очень сложно назвать это иначе, «Загнанная в угол крыса».
Блумберг уже сливал в прессу, что Украина разрабатывала планы по уничтожению гражданских самолетов дронами (с ИИ-распознаванием) на территории России, с людьми на борту, но отказалась от этих планов как слишком рискованных…
Итоги лета 2026 + Пехотинец
И всё таки, что на фронте? Зачем Билецкого поставили спасать Донбасс? Что ближе, наше истощение, или наша победа?
https://youtu.be/uLzNLFAtnUM
https://live.vkvideo.ru/catmoderne/
Нация и конец постсоветскости + Роман Юнеман
В гостях общественный деятель Роман Юнеман. Мы обсудим конец постсоветской эпохи, надвигающийся кризис управления в России и то, как война на Украине повлияет на формирование новых национальных идентичностей на постсоветском пространстве. Роман поделится своим отношением к советскому прошлому, будущим выборам и, внезапно, к урбанистике.
https://youtube.com/live/HCTS7ZHrR…
На основном Котомодерне вышло две статьи, они достаточно важные
Из-за принципа «политик развивается быстрее своей рефлексии», понимание масштаба и значимости происходящего отстает от самих событий. Например, абсолютное большинство людей в России до сих пор живет в концепции постсоветского пространства и двухстороннего Украино-Российского конфликта.
Работая именно на это ощущение, вражеская пропаганда может добивать…
Конечно, крайне желательно доказать, что «здесь тренд сломался». Но уже ясно: силы требуемой для этого просто нет.
Но не буду категоричен.
Может и есть, но Трамп не считает нужным применять её здесь (и считает другие направления более важными). Это спорный вопрос.
Тем не менее, похоже, США больше не пытаются защищать ключевой элемент Pax Americana: «если ты наш вассал, то какие бы ресурсы мы у тебя не требовали в …
Я уже вижу ваш вопрос, «а что у Украины есть что терять?». Есть конечно. Просто сейчас кажется, что оставшаяся территория и население за таким бронебойным щитом ВСУ, что даже и думать о потере ценных городов, ресурсов и территорий не надо. Урон от воздушных атак починим. А физически «вас тут не стояло».
Так вот, представим, что или «стояло», или потенциально очень скоро будет «стояло». Приходится подписывать, что да…
При этом в Восточной Европе будут другие голоса: «Вы что, идиоты, Украину сейчас съели, мы можем быть следующие, что вы за союзники, если усиливаете нашу угрозу?»
В итоге, Западная Европа смотрит на то, сколько стоит холодная война, а Восточная смотрит на последствия возможной горячей. Конфликт.
Для и так проблемного Евросоюза, это огромная гиря, которую вешать себе на шею никто не хочет. И пока есть «дешевые» укра…
Почему все так уперлись?
Давайте вспомним, текущая война идет уже пять лет. На неё потрачены невообразимые деньги. Приложены сумасшедшие политические усилия. Убиты сотни тысяч людей. Принуждены к переезду миллионы. С двух сторон фронта. И ладно мы такие больные, уперлись рогом, ничего не понимаем в ценности жизни, как там ещё говорится.
Но наши оппоненты потратили в денежном выражении ещё больше. США, ЕС, Британия и…
В обсуждениях политики ЕС и США всегда есть слон в комнате. Западная политика другая. Там другие левые, другие правые, другие проблемы и методы их решения. Это нельзя не заметить. Дискурс западной политики глубоко разошёлся с нашим. Но почему?
Поговорим о длинном 1968-м — революции, которую СССР не прошёл. Общественный конфликт, результат которого Россия получила позже, уже в виде готовых идей, норм и институтов. Ка…
Я хочу сказать главное — ключевая ошибка анализа состоит в линейной экстраполяции нынешней скорости фронта: «За пять лет прошли столько-то километров, значит до Киева столько-то десятилетий, до Ужгорода столько-то столетий». Война так не работает.
Сколько лет понадобится советским войскам на взятие Берлина, если за год была потеряна территория от Польши до Москвы?
Позиционный фронт может несколько лет двигаться на …
Изменилась разведка, FPV, КАБы, способы штурма, борьба с дронами, удары по логистике, организация снабжения, взаимодействие пехоты и беспилотников. Меняется промышленный тыл. Накопленный опыт перестал быть опытом отдельных подразделений и превратился в систему. Вспомните как Татарский в 2022 году в видео в ТГ пытался убеждать аудиторию, что дроны имеют смысл и нельзя их игнорировать. Сейчас, при современных масштабах…
Где конец? О бесконечном штурме коровников
Всё чаще в комментариях, в постах, в роликах вижу тезис о «бесконечной войне»: «Война бессмысленна, она давно стала вечным, бесконечным позиционным конфликтом. Люди умирают за коровники, общества уничтожают друг-друга, конфликт больше ни к чему не приведет».
Я считаю эту позицию, во-первых, неправильным описанием текущих реалий, а во-вторых, крайне выгодной Украине в её те…
❤156👍42👎20🤔6🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @catmoderne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@catmoderne edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Котомодерн” (@catmoderne), 11,850 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catmoderne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.