telegram 关键词自动回复机器人 https://github.com/yesanqian/Telegram-Keyword-Auto-Reply
❤4

Channel
@cd5plf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,119subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002166220382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cd5plf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cd5plf |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 4,119 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 4,121 | +11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 4,110 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 4,113 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 4,127 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 4,128 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 4,138 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 4,144 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 4,139 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 4,148 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 4,156 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 4,160 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 4,163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 4,163 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 72.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 25.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
telegram 关键词自动回复机器人 https://github.com/yesanqian/Telegram-Keyword-Auto-Reply
❤4
#上海普陀区 #探花 探花女主角重出江湖,超级反差,酷似网红董赤赤
❤4
#胡图图 #探花女主 #深圳 作品关键词: xb-1082 杏吧七仔 - 一個缺錢的清純可愛美少女看見會激起男士的保護欲 今天花3000块钱约了一个大学兼职的学生妹妹妹非常清纯可 七仔约了个兼职的学妹清纯可爱在一声声呻吟中结束战斗 杏吧七仔 探花【七仔】 今天花3000块钱约了一个大学兼职的学生妹,妹妹非常清纯可爱,一看见就有一种保护欲望,在床上妹妹一声声呻吟中结束战斗 探花【七仔】重金约操学生妹,单纯可爱不经世事的样子。被操的呻吟不断
❤5
https://t.me/s/cdwwok?before=20
❤3👍1
https://t.me/+YEh0tEpwpDRmMzZh 搞了一个备份频道,防止被封
🔥1
没有验证过,先发出来
郫县郫都区开课啦,18岁哦😘 联系安排:@paopao6060
❤6
成都楼凤 . 车库 pinned Deleted message
https://tgstat.com/channel/@cdwwok
❤6
成都外围收集 https://t.me/cdwwok 兄弟们可以忽略,不用管🙈😂 里面啥都没有 https://t.me/s/cdwwok #成都外围 以后用来收集成都靠谱外围资料的
❤6👎1
@XY_0099 这个等后续有兄弟排雷,🤔
❤3
#成都 #楼凤 #修车 #资源 #成都楼凤 【成都楼凤.车库】 #美林 美林 车牌:@Ouhu977 现在频道是骗子在使用了,妹子失联了 7p 12pp #7p #武侯区 美林,红星桥,河南妹子,26,167,110斤,🐻天然大E! 人照九分基本无差 ,脸上看得出有点轻微科技但完全不影响,成熟御姐,胸很大还不咋下垂,大蟒🐍,微胖身材比较大只,服务不多,下面紧度湿度都很不错还会夹,身体还易高潮,综合值得打卡,喜欢大胸微胖御姐身材的无脑冲就是了,缺点代 聊 频道主评述: 无意中看到这个妹子的资料,听说人照一致,没有兄弟验证过 确认的是: 是代聊!代聊!代聊 有了解情况的兄弟欢迎分享 情况
👍17❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @cd5plf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cd5plf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都楼凤 . 车库” (@cd5plf), 4,119 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cd5plf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.