Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cdac / ccat preparation

Channel

Cdac / ccat preparation

@cdacccatpreparation

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,949subscribers

-144 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146551608
TypeChannel
Username@cdacccatpreparation
CreatedBetween 1 March 2016 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cdacccatpreparation

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,9476,0936,02010 September 2026 — 6,093 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,093 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,089 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,076 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,030 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,995 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,979 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,970 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,964 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,960 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,947 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,949 subscribers5,94910 September 202626 October 2026
12 measurements spanning 46 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,925–6,115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 13:015,949+2
23 Oct 2026, 15:155,947-13
20 Oct 2026, 14:185,960-4
18 Oct 2026, 00:015,964-6
15 Oct 2026, 04:365,970-9
12 Oct 2026, 00:385,979-16
5 Oct 2026, 18:415,995-35
28 Sept 2026, 12:416,030-46
16 Sept 2026, 06:196,076-13
12 Sept 2026, 13:006,089-4
10 Sept 2026, 20:246,093no change
10 Sept 2026, 20:226,093first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤646.2%
👎538.5%
👍17.69%
🤣17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC272 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

📢 Planning to appear for the next CDAC C-CAT? Don’t wait until the last moment! 🚀 Start your preparation from today and give yourself enough time to build strong concepts and score a good rank. 📚 Visit 👉 free-learning.in 🎯 Start your C-CAT preparation today 🔥 Prepare smart. Practice consistently. Aim for a great rank! Your CDAC journey starts with your preparation. 💯 👉 free-learning.in

❤1

Signed A P

18 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC315 viewsread 10 September 2026

Join our telegram channel for cdac exam discussion:- https://t.me/freelearning5697

Signed A P

16 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 10 September 2026

Jan 2025 cutoff Mumbai Region VITA Mumbai : DAC Cutoff: Below 1400 CDAC Kharghar Mumbai : DAC Cutoff: Below 2400 CDAC Juhu Mumbai : DAC Cutoff:Below 3000 YCP Mumbai : DAC Cutoff: Below 4500 MET Mumbai : DAC Cutoff: Below 3400

Signed A P

16 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,090 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Jan 2025 cutoff Other Regions Knowledge Park Bangalore (CDAC KP) : DAC Cutoff: Below 1900 E-City Bengaluru : DAC Cutoff:Below 3000 CDAC Hyderabad : DAC Cutoff:Below 6000 CDAC Noida : DAC Cutoff: Below 6100

❤1

Signed A P

16 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,030 views7 reactionsread 10 September 2026

JAN -2025 cutoff Pune Region CDAC ACTS Pune : DAC Cutoff:Below 200 Sunbeam Pune : DAC Cutoff: Below 650 IACSD Akurdi Pune : DAC Cutoff:Below 1500 Sunbeam Karad : DAC Cutoff: Below 1100 Know IT Pune : DAC Cutoff: Below 2100 IET Pune : DAC Cutoff: Below 2800 Infoway Pune : DAC Cutoff: Below 3200

👎5❤2

Signed A P

16 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC892 viewsread 10 September 2026

Everyone please read this blog if you have doubt related to rank and cutoffs

Signed A P

16 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC885 viewsread 10 September 2026

https://free-learning.in/blogs/ccat-cutoff-rank-predictor-2026.html

Signed A P

16 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,000 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Result Out for CDAC CCAT 2026 Check your result:- https://free-learning.in/

❤1

Signed A P

9 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 10 September 2026

Hey everyone kindly read this artical. “LIFE AT CDAC” https://free-learning.in/blogs/life-at-cdac-what-to-expect.html

Signed A P

5 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTCviews —

Cdac / ccat preparation pinned «📢 Hi Everyone! We hope your CDAC CCAT August 2026 Exam went well! 🤞 Kindly take 2 minutes to fill out the CCAT Exam Feedback Form. Your feedback will help future aspirants and also help us improve our website ( free-learning.in ). 📝 CDAC CCAT August 2026…»

5 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,000 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

📢 Hi Everyone! We hope your CDAC CCAT August 2026 Exam went well! 🤞 Kindly take 2 minutes to fill out the CCAT Exam Feedback Form. Your feedback will help future aspirants and also help us improve our website ( free-learning.in ). 📝 CDAC CCAT August 2026 Exam Feedback Form: 👇 [https://forms.gle/Nt8RuoD5VLEtsEZA7] Thank you for your support, and we wish you the very best for your CCAT results! 🚀

❤1

Signed A P

4 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

📊 How was today’s CCAT paper?

  1. 😄 Very Easy19%
  2. 🙂 Easy25%
  3. 😐 Moderate40%
  4. 😓 Difficult14%
  5. 😵 Very Difficult13%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed A P

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cdacccatpreparation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTCAnonymous Poll145 voters

📊 How was today’s CCAT paper?

  1. 😄 Very Easy19%
  2. 🙂 Easy25%
  3. 😐 Moderate40%
  4. 😓 Difficult14%
  5. 😵 Very Difficult13%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jobs (IT | Data Science | Coding | Tech)
@Jobs_IT_Data_Science_Coding_Tech · 27,116
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cdac / ccat preparation” (@cdacccatpreparation), 5,949 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cdacccatpreparation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.