Channel
@cdcpupupupu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,348subscribers
+3,715 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003804931045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cdcpupupupu |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 20 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cdcpupupupu |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 6,348 | +264 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 6,084 | +106 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 5,978 | +76 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 5,902 | +73 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 5,829 | +2,111 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 3,718 | +77 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 3,641 | +129 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 3,512 | +146 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 3,366 | +184 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 3,182 | +191 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 2,991 | +341 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 2,650 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 2,633 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 98.1% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
老师名：猫猫【成都】 用户名：@mao630 价格：4p【活动价】【本次出击为原价】 特点：嫩妹 BBW 重坦 白皮 无纹身 日感在线 水量足 后半段明催 小蛇 零情绪价值 总评： 爱与痛的边缘。 目测一百六十斤以上，一米七的个头。妥妥的重型坦克。这个身高配上这个体重，开门那一霎那，往你面前一站，视线基本被填满，震撼性十足。然后你会听到一句怯生生的”你好“，反差感有了。 颜值就是频道照片上的那副五官，单看每个零部件都不差，但被一张大脸均匀拉伸之后，精致感就被稀释得干干净净，她其实真正属于小红书上每天都在被鼓励的那个群体：“姐妹，你瘦下来一定很好看“ 皮肤白嫩，是那种让人想伸手的白，毛孔也很细，是真正的好皮肤，也没纹身，干干净净。 身形没什么好委婉的：白花花一座小肉山。站着的时候肉叠肉，躺下以后肉摊肉。如果你是BBW这个赛道的受众，这一幕其实算最大的福利。丰腴肥美，不是瑕疵，而是主菜。圆肩、圆腰、圆胯，没有棱角，没…
❤7
老师名：王宝宝【成都】 用户名：@WangbBaobei 价格：6P10PP【本次出击为原价】 特点：少御 中颜偏高 C杯 美乳 黄白皮 大蟒蛇 无纹身 重庆口音 后入一般 口技平庸 医美脸 总评： 一张让你想谈恋爱的脸，一对让你等不及谈恋爱的胸。 频道里的她，被拍老了至少十岁。不知道图片是谁选的，又或是她对"好看"这件事有某种误解，展示面里的王宝宝，是那种三十好几、妆容厚重、眼神里写着"老娘什么都见过"的标准少妇感。色调暗沉，风格保守，整体气质像某个离异但保养得当的财务主管。这是完完全全的负面作用，也筛选掉了很多本该属于她的客户。 所以这篇报告的第一条结论不是关于她的脸蛋肉体及一切，而是。她的展示面是反向滤镜，真人会比照片好。请记住这件事，然后往下读。 当真人站在你面前，你会发现完全是两码事。展示面里的"熟女感"在你眼前几乎找不到任何对应物，就像去饭馆点了一碗老火汤，端上来的却是一杯棒打鲜橙。 目测只有二十三…
❤7
玩腻了90分钟的刺激？来试试在超市里谈谈感情~😉 7x24小时夜夜日日，天猫超市包养，不止满足你的身体，更填满你的心。 天猫超市包养，加时加量不加价，全国速配，同城最快半日达！ 快来超市中意的那个她💛💛 唯一客服 : @tianmaoby 全国选人 : @baoyangqgzy
❤1
💎红楼阁——高端会所💎 🌟主营-95半套-98全套-98海选 ❤️高端全套大海选 一排一排的选 氛围感拉满 选满意在玩【质量相当于有外围中圈和中大圈】 ✅自家高端95半套店 不冲卡 单次消费 没有隐形消费 高质量 服务有保障 每天在线30➕选满意在消费 有免费小吃 泡澡 凌晨后可留宿 ❤️全城也可以给你安排 高端95半套-98全套 会所宗旨：诚信经营服务至上、让你乘兴而来满意而归 狼友评价：@BBmOGY9 加入频道：@BmOGY9 加入群组：@MBmOGY9 电报预约： @aofeng567 双向机器人： @CDHonglou_bot 😀😃😄😆
❤8
浦浦一刻 pinned «【浦浦一刻】特别感谢 官方商务合作伙伴 如下： 成都外围狗哥甄选 @CDWWZX 成都会所啊城 @aofeng567 成都铜雀台私影 @TQTSY888 全国天猫包养 @tianmaoby 桃花坞娃娃体验馆 @taohuajiejie»
🥰🥰【成都铜雀台私人影院】 🥰🥰 👉👉成都顶级质量小姐姐👉👉 本店所有助教均为 18-23 岁的在校生，年轻有活力，可探索不同尺度，真人无照骗，活力满满💕 🍬体验不同于老师的新鲜感🍬 💥爆款套餐💥 TG专属价：💸🤗🤗🤗 60分钟 🤑外送到家🤑 TG专属价：💸🤗🤗🤗🥵 120分钟（顾客需额外支付妹妹来回车费） 服务内容： 1.可以和妹妹玩沉浸角色扮演、感受禁忌的激情 2.可以和妹妹贴贴、🉑kiss💋🐍喂，感情升温，沉浸在美好的二人世界 3.可以让妹妹骑乘式抱抱、含羞带怯的妹妹像是出了水,又像是起了火 🔥，满眼柔情，主动黏着与你互动 4. 可以让妹妹在您耳边娇喘、感受甜甜的气息 5. 可以无障碍摸胸,亲胸，舔胸感受她嫩滑的肌肤。 6. 可以撕扯妹妹的丝袜、撕裂的声音无比解压哦，可以用你带温度的💋感受妹妹的美腿🦵🏻 🐉😀😀🐉🐉 😍😍全新柔影上线！😍😍 💚主题日换装+私影 打造MMK服务新标杆💚 【全身按摩…
❤2
关于“浦浦一刻”电报频道重建与升级公告 重山已过，归途如虹 “浦浦一刻” Telegram 官方频道正式完成重建，重塑归来！ 此前，因遭遇恶意举报与外部攻击，频道一度陷入动荡。但暗夜不熄星芒，狂风难折劲草！面对挑战，我选择主动击碎枷锁，以更坚韧的姿态完成自我迭代与重塑。 目录导航 全线修复 此前因频道失效影响的全局目录导航与检索系统已全面修复完成！架构重组，脉络清晰，过往精选内容与核心资源一触即达，检索体验焕然一新。 内容合规 尺度重塑 破后而立，安全先行。 经过深思熟虑与全量清查，我已完全删除了此前涉及敏感争议的现场实拍内容。自即日起，频道在图片呈现上将严控尺度、保持保守。 初心不改，唯读者不可辜负 在流量至上、喧嚣浮躁的时代，人们往往执念于数字的增长，但“浦浦一刻”始终认为：千万人声鼎沸，不如知己二三。 频道的关注人数，从来不是我挂念的虚妄；唯有屏幕另一端每一个真正认可、理解并持续关注我的读者，才是频道得以立…
❤3
浦浦一刻 pinned a photo
老师名：养乐多【成都】 用户名：@yangld520 价格：8p【本次出击为原价】 特点：嫩妹 165cm C杯 小蛇 人照九分 暖白皮 中颜 流畅曲线 全身无赘肉 三点粉 白虎穴 小S属性 惊艳臀胯比 标准网黄身材 无69 无69 无69 不叫床 软件略差 性认知比较低 代聊【死不承认自己是代版】 总评： 刚开门那时，看着妹妹穿着一条简单的直筒牛仔裤，一件再普通不过的白色短款T恤加外套披肩，甚至有点想打退堂鼓。毕竟养乐多的脸蛋看起来也不是我的菜：就是张川渝地区最常见的、略带婴儿肥的小圆脸，肉乎乎的，鼻头也不算挺拔。尤其那双眼睛，是细长的丹凤眼，对你似笑非笑的瞬间，眯成了弯弯的缝，嵌在圆润的脸盘上。 若单看这小圆脸和细眯眼，配上略显张扬的挑眉和满不在乎的神气，你会觉得她隐隐带了些职高、中专里那些“精神小妹”的野气，神似柏芝在《喜剧之王》里穿着JK叼着烟头那个妓女的轻狂样子。 但当她褪去所有衣衫，我几乎有点看呆：她…
❤5
老师名：幺妹儿【成都】【重庆】 用户名： @bb13145200 【两地通用】 价格： 6p10pp【本次原价出击】 特点： 御姐 低颜 大蟒蛇 无纹身 微胖 冷白皮 馒头逼 人工白虎 情绪价值高 无陪洗 总评：吕布骑狗，身子是吕布，头是狗。 丑话必须最直白、最不绕弯子、最扎心的说在最前头：幺妹儿只适合对颜值零要求的人。| 是零，不是低。 你对脸的权重需求但凡超过三成，这篇报告可以就此合上，后面写的对你全是无效废话。 还在看的各位，恭喜你们洞悉了皮囊虚妄,算得上是直奔本质的体验派战士，那我们继续打开天窗说亮话。 先捅破那层最薄的窗户纸吧：幺妹儿的长相，是那种你带出去跟兄弟吃饭，兄弟会偷偷私下问你"是不是最近手头有点紧"的程度。往好听了说叫普通，说人话就是让人比较沉默。一位标准虾系老师，去头可食。她是真正的妇人面相，像楼下菜市场卖猪肉的大姐，周末换上裙子喷了香水进城跟你开房的既视感。让她穿上围裙在厨房给你炒个回锅…
❤4
老师名：小鱼仔【成都】 用户名：@fairytail5216 价格：7p11pp【本次出击为原价】 特点：大蟒蛇 b杯 嫩妹 高颜 流畅曲线 黄皮 敏感不耐 人工白虎 陪伴感强 总评： 进门将鱼仔拥入怀中，第一印象:正常黄色的皮肤嫩滑紧致，如刚剥壳的鲜虾。 高颜值偏韩国女团脸，照片相似度很高，几乎就是本人。妆画得不错，有活脱脱从idol舞台上走下来的感觉。 目测161左右，偏小只，流畅柔美的身体曲线，小翘臀不夸张却恰到好处地托起腰线，肉腿匀称细腻，带着一丢丢可爱的小肚子。小臂上有几处面积不大的纹身，添了几分叛逆小野猫的味道。 舌吻特别卖力，湿热纠缠。口技一般般。人工白虎穴粉嫩紧致，敏感度爆表，很容易就被带上高潮，但也正因如此不耐久战，每次到顶点时全身轻颤、呼吸乱成一团，真实反馈拉满。 妹子有很强的陪伴感，聊天全程在线，接梗快、情绪调动自然，古灵精怪又带点小黏人，让人不知不觉就沉浸在女友氛围里。服务态度松弛…
❤5
老师名：鹤柠【成都】 用户名：已上岸 价格：8p13pp【本次出击为原价】 特点：高颜 人照九分 良家感 御姐 蛇蛇精 大只马 极品微胖胴体 女版123 总评： 【预防针：本频道从头至尾主打一个故意夹带私货的偏主观评论风格，这篇可能也带有比较明显的个人喜好】 产地河南，容颜有风韵而无风尘，北方女人的国泰民安脸，实际年纪看上去27左右。全妆显优雅气质，脸上可以看到饰演《芳华》的女星杨采钰的影子，受过很良好高等教育的气质主播挂，颜值是看脸就会迅速起立的程度。 是货真价实的大E。如果说E里面再分等级，那这E杯绝对可以算得上等货色，无论从坚挺程度，乳头色泽大小，实际触感，基本挑不出一点毛病，是匈奴人狂喜的宝贝级别。再配上一个弹性十足的肉臀和一双结实有力的蜜大腿，比例优秀的让我感觉实际身高可能不止165，大概168的样子。越是性经验多的男性，越容易沉醉于这样的肉体中。 硬件方面总结下就是五个字：小中圈毛坯。 她还是一个蛇…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cdcpupupupu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“浦浦一刻” (@cdcpupupupu), 6,348 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cdcpupupupu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.