Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 云长®出击实录(成都重庆)

Channel

云长®出击实录(成都重庆)

@cddj88

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

36,361subscribers

+13,143 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002220928961
TypeChannel
Username@cddj88
Description人体扫描仪,成都重庆两地,第一人称带你走进出击视角,指引出击方向 联系云长: @yccj88
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cddj88

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

20,700 average views per post against 36,361 subscribers — an engagement rate of 56.8%. Across the 1,290 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,968 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.06% and 5.86%, with a median of 2.53%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured25 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled516,330
Mature posts only58.3% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers36,361 measured 8 September 2026
Cohortb31623:zho · 1,290 channels · p10 0.321% · p25 1.06% · p50 2.53% · p75 5.86% · p90 12.4%
Position in cohort99.922th percentile · 22.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.026% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

23,21836,36129,789.511 August 2026 — 23,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,218 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,236 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,967 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,975 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,811 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,694 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,237 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,576 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,044 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,510 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,117 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,922 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,416 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,813 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,394 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,746 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,061 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,424 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,783 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,287 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34,529 subscribers3 September 2026 — 34,872 subscribers4 September 2026 — 35,285 subscribers8 September 2026 — 36,361 subscribers11 August 20268 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +13,143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,247–38,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 01:5836,361+1,076
4 Sept 2026, 21:5535,285+413
3 Sept 2026, 07:5434,872+343
2 Sept 2026, 03:1434,529+242
1 Sept 2026, 05:0834,287+504
31 Aug 2026, 04:0633,783+359
30 Aug 2026, 05:2833,424+363
29 Aug 2026, 05:4733,061+315
28 Aug 2026, 05:5832,746+352
27 Aug 2026, 07:4832,394+581
26 Aug 2026, 09:1431,813+397
25 Aug 2026, 05:4231,416+494
24 Aug 2026, 06:1130,922+805
22 Aug 2026, 13:4430,117+607
21 Aug 2026, 04:5529,510+466
20 Aug 2026, 08:0229,044+468
19 Aug 2026, 10:1728,576+339
18 Aug 2026, 12:2228,237+543
17 Aug 2026, 15:0627,694+883
16 Aug 2026, 08:0426,811first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.8%
avg views ÷ 36,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,700
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.206%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held31 (29 July 20268 September 2026)
Views total516,330
Reactions total1,066
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
92
Videos
29
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,327 reactions across 31 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,21191.3%
👍503.77%
🥰302.26%
👏211.58%
🔥141.06%
💩10.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 31 we hold a reading for · 87%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cddj88. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 19:47 UTC≈7,340 views9 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

点击 本频道 置顶 方便查看 云长《出击实录 》导航 兄弟们,这是云长【合作商家】出击作品: #点击蓝色字体查看⬇️⬇️⬇️ 😦 成都商家 大师兄外围: 视频报告01 视频报告02 百花半套: 视频报告01 特色鸳鸯浴: 视频报告01 名仕荟半套: 视频报告01 文东嫩妹工作室: 视频报告01 视频报告02 视频报告03 😦 重庆商家 洲际外围: 视频报告01

9

8 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈8,920 views20 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】: #重庆洲际外围 【逆贼✦旗号】: @CQ9895 【讨伐✦悬赏】: 1100p 【会战✦地点】:#重庆 #两江新区 #鲤鱼池 #李家坪 【敌将✦形体】:身高165,体重100-105斤左右,胸c,吊钟奶,乳头乳晕小,粉褐色,bb外褐内粉,屁股大,肚子有块疤 【敌将✦武艺】: 陪洗,ab面,口,舔咪咪,爱爱,有舌吻(没舌) ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】:迫于出击老师圈已无可奈何,联系重庆围子,问了客服这个围子可以,并说明了围子优缺情况,也可拍视频,这次没单独去开房间,因为客服说了质量很一般,只是可拍,那就直接去自带教室的,心情忐忑,兄弟们,我已经麻木了,等我出一期模版“#勒是雾都”,这次云长无可奈何,出击围子吧,围子有些还不错,这个围子较弱,因为可拍,客服也跟我说清了情况,兄弟们,跟随着云长“#第一人称”视角欣赏

16👏4

8 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC≈8,470 views7 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

全网0纠纷记录 售后无忧无需任何担心,入会只是开始 全国各地区都有,出差 商务接待 旅游陪伴 各种服务应有尽有! 资源真实有效,全部附带和妹子本人视频录屏认证,见面先看视频验证 让你享受无伞和内设感受 并且SM COS服装应有尽有! 见面面试不满意,%100退还介绍费! 包见面,包doi,货不对版包退换! 【夜色包养选妃频道全网资源: @yese7988 【夜色双向机器人: @yese988_bot 【夜色包养伴游联系方式:@yese798

7

6 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC≈15,100 views32 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】: #沫沫 【逆贼✦旗号】: @mm15672 【讨伐✦悬赏】: 600p 【会战✦地点】:#重庆 #南岸区 #会展中心 【敌将✦形体】:身高168左右,体重95-100斤,正常肤色无赘肉,胸C-,乳头乳晕小,浅褐色,人工白虎,bb浅褐色内粉 【敌将✦武艺】: 陪洗,舔咪咪,舌吻,口,爱爱 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】:乖巧可爱的御姐,有着一对小兔牙,兄弟们,沫沫老师的兔牙不是那种很突出的,只是若隐若现搭配着沫沫乖巧可爱的脸蛋,胸部手感好有弹性,bb浅褐内粉人工白虎适合炫,沫沫老师相处起来很舒服,也配合云长开头可爱的姿势,兄弟们跟随云长“#第一人称”视角欣赏 【军势✦评级】:校尉 将军(极品)、都尉(少见的精品)、校尉(值得回锅)、千夫长(值得打卡)、百夫长(良品)、什长(及格) 【武圣✦批注】:颜值耐看且乖巧可

25🔥7

6 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈14,100 views11 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

🧤【成都特色鸳鸯浴】🧤 鸳鸯戏水 芳沁柔汤 呢喃波间 唯属彼此 ✈️新店正式启航✈️ 欢迎您的大驾光临 ☔️所有妹妹均为的年轻兼职妹妹 ☔️年轻颜值 活力满满 ☔️私密享受 极致体验 ☔️共浴兰汤,鸳鸯戏水 ☔️黑丝、情趣、制服任选 ☔️半裸见兔,🐻推,臀莎 🤔🤔😶😶🫠 🤗🤗🤗 注:#所有套餐没有任何额外隐形费用,#可放心消费 🫨客服:【 @wanhao669 】 云长出击: 视频报告链接

11

3 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC≈21,700 views45 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】: #柳… 【逆贼✦旗号】: 云长再三思索,不放车牌了,颜值软,身材和软件还可以 【讨伐✦悬赏】: 1000p 【会战✦地点】:#重庆 #南岸区 #弹子石 【敌将✦形体】:身高158,体重85-90斤,正常肤色偏白,胸b+,乳头大,乳头乳晕褐色,bb外褐内粉,蝴蝶b,颜值偏弱 【敌将✦武艺】: 陪洗,水中萧,舔咪咪,口,舌吻,爱爱 【备注】:#在这个老师之前还发生了一些不愉快的cj事件,#转身和硬吃,#云长是原价不被腐蚀不乱写报告,#兄弟们我缓俩天,#最后我会总结在一个模版“勒是雾都” ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】:兄弟们,我真的好无语,我经历这么多已经疲惫了,原来每个城市的tg群都有默许这些事:假照,价格虚高…..那些群写的人照9分,颜值9分,是怎么样就怎么样吗!真特么无语,那就干脆拿自己做好案例,cj吧,真人颜值

45

3 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC≈20,300 views27 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Video

兄弟们给大家推荐一家 💥成渝商K战袍游戏场 云长最近也要去探探 成都重庆店每日出勤佳丽均130➕ 🥰特色玩法不限于: 高山流水 / 处女膜 / 冰火两重天 / 九宫格 / 舌尖诱惑 / 10点半 / 找老婆…等等几十种福利荤游戏玩到你腿抽筋…… 🥰后场关灯收手机 沙发激情舞蹈|互动近身真空秀 脱衣舞 黑丝白丝撕到只剩下小内内…… 成渝商K 认准李富贵🥳 主营真空游戏场🥳 极品小时场,顶级商务场均可安排 专人接待,不宰客不欺客📱📱📱📱 🔗点击下面蓝色字体跳转: 🔥预定点这里🔥 🔥玩法介绍🔥 🔥全国预定点这里🔥 🔥点此加入组队福利群🔔 👍📱 19382386106 #成都商K #重庆商k #真空游戏场

18👍5🥰4

2 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈20,300 views54 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】: #夏竹 【逆贼✦旗号】: @xzhu521 【讨伐✦悬赏】: 700p 【会战✦地点】:#重庆 #两江新区 #江北区 #刘家台 【敌将✦形体】:身高165,体重90-100斤之间,胸B+,乳头乳晕小,褐色,皮肤偏白,bb外褐内粉 【敌将✦武艺】: 帮洗,深喉,口,舔咪咪,大蟒蛇,爱爱 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】:一见面,甜甜可爱萌动的俏佳人,这是嫩妹特征?但出现在这位御姐乖巧的脸上,果断交完水费,感觉老师全程不是刻意地笑,很有亲和力,那我直接抱起来到大腿上,摸着屁股,接着舌吻到沙发上,和老师聊天很像朋友,甚至在爱爱的时候,老师也在笑,说感觉和朋友在爱爱,把我也逗笑了,你说说看,这么良辰时刻,搞这一出,但很开心的过程,在这位御姐类型的老师脸上写着大大的“反差”,反馈好骚,兄弟们,跟随着云长“#第一人称”视角欣赏

43👍6🥰5

2 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈19,100 views22 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

老字号 百花半套 会所 价格 :#460 高端大型会所,mm选满意再耍,每天40多个在线,口碑店,全程无额外消费,不办卡,凌晨2点后免费留宿! 老字号,肯定安排巴适! 预约: @zr308981571(耍耍巫总) 频道: @CD_baihua 云长出击: 视频报告链接

13👍5🥰4

1 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈21,100 views52 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】: #糖心 【逆贼✦旗号】: @MH565679 【讨伐✦悬赏】: 800p 【会战✦地点】:#重庆 #两江新区 #江北区 #红土地 【敌将✦形体】:身高165,体重100斤以内,全身无赘肉,没有人照,真人眼神妩媚,狐狸眼,颜值耐看,胸c,乳头花生大小,乳头乳晕褐色,bb外褐内粉 【敌将✦武艺】: 陪洗,水中萧,长时间a面服务,舌吻(我都伸回去了,她还恋恋不舍),口,舔咪咪,爱爱 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】:兄弟们,云长近段时间重庆与成都俩地跑,昨天刚来重庆,实话云长还不太熟悉重庆这边出击圈,那就开始探路吧,看老师频道还不错,果断约一个看着还不错的老师,见到老师,一身jk装扮加妩媚眼神,胸部挺拔支撑着那件裸露的上装,似见非见的既视感,让老师把灯打开很明亮,看清楚老师容貌后,虽和频道身材照(老师频道无露脸照)不一致,但

43🔥7🥰2

31 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈20,900 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 September 2026
Video

🔥想在成都玩得放心、玩得真实?”“别再被假资源坑了!” “成都外围,认准大师兄!” ❤️深耕成都多年,频道全部真实报告,真实到让你不敢相信。 “不管你想找什么类型、什么价位, 🔥大师兄这里都有最真实、最靠谱的资源。”成都本地随便打听, 老字号口碑,假的没人敢认! 🌸成都外围认准大师兄真实报告天天更新。 想玩就来,绝不坑!大师兄,只做真实! 报告频道: https://t.me/+LJwwqsbw8wZlYzg1 在线选妃: @DSXWWBY 客服大师兄 @CDdashixiong 双向机器人 @chengdudsx_bot 防丢机器人 @dsxdh_bot 云长出击 : 视频报告链接01 视频报告链接02

17

30 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈20,400 views50 reactions2 Starsread 8 September 2026
Photo

点击 本频道 置顶 方便查看 云长《出击实录 》导航 兄弟们,这是云长8月份出击实录 点击 #蓝色字体名字查看作品: 🔥 百夫长: ✨8p阿狸 ✨7p佳多宝 🔥 千夫长: ✨7p大cc ✨7p琳琳 ✨私影007 ✨百花半套 ✨名仕荟半套 ✨外围安欣 ✨外围小依依 🔥 校尉: ✨8p梦小乔 ✨12pp梦小乔 ✨6p果儿 ✨6p棉棉 ✨6p雅妃 ✨7p凡凡大人 ✨9p雪莉 ✨文东工作室丫丫 🔥 都尉: ✨6p芯儿 ✨7p琪宝儿 ✨鸳鸯浴丹丹 ✨6pyy

42👏8

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @cddj88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@cddj88 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“云长®出击实录(成都重庆)” (@cddj88), 36,361 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cddj88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.