Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IELTS Sources

Channel

IELTS Sources

@cdieltssources

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,884subscribers

+2,347 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003495245114
TypeChannel
Username@cdieltssources
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cdieltssources

Growth

21,51525,43123,4739 August 2026 — 21,537 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,515 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,462 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,845 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,145 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,108 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,261 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,944 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,431 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,302 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,292 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,115 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,765 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,662 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,542 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,541 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,486 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,400 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,300 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,217 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,124 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,038 subscribers4 September 2026 — 24,006 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,884 subscribers23,8849 August 20266 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 28 days, net +2,347. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,928–26,018 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 15:5623,884-122
4 Sept 2026, 07:1524,006-32
2 Sept 2026, 17:2324,038-86
1 Sept 2026, 19:0624,124-93
31 Aug 2026, 20:1424,217-83
30 Aug 2026, 16:5824,300-100
29 Aug 2026, 16:5424,400-86
28 Aug 2026, 17:1124,486-55
27 Aug 2026, 19:5324,541-1
26 Aug 2026, 22:5524,542-120
25 Aug 2026, 22:3424,662-103
24 Aug 2026, 23:3524,765-350
23 Aug 2026, 09:2425,115-177
21 Aug 2026, 19:4725,292-10
20 Aug 2026, 17:3425,302-129
19 Aug 2026, 14:4825,431+487
18 Aug 2026, 12:4324,944+683
17 Aug 2026, 12:1424,261+153
16 Aug 2026, 04:4824,108-37
14 Aug 2026, 14:5424,145first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 23,884 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,950
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.781%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held40 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total154,730
Reactions total1,209
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,221 reactions across 40 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,01645.7%
67330.3%
22710.2%
👍1346.03%
💯723.24%
🥰351.58%
🎉271.22%
😎180.81%
👏130.585%
🫡60.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cdieltssources. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈3,340 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Bugun ham yana bir candidate ga barcha speaking savollar- shu kanalimizga yuborilgan Xaftalik speaking dan tushibdi

🔥116

15 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈3,400 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

This passages 1 [ about Rubber] appeared in today's IELTS exam.

7

15 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈3,440 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Weekly Prediction for Reading (By 20 Aug) Charles Darwin and the Modern Workplace Coins – the first form of money New Understanding of Giraffes in the Wild Rubber Rebranding Art Museums The conquest of malaria in Italy Save endangered languages Learning from the Romans 200 Years of Australian Landscapes at the Royal Academy in London The tuatara – past and future History of pencil Sydney opera house The importance o

26🔥72

14 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈4,820 views19 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

3️⃣2️⃣7️⃣➕ kishi "Top Prep 2" Bepul kursiga qoʻshilib boʻldi #️⃣ Qolib ketmang, joylar cheklangan, 18-avgust kuni qabul yopiladi ⚡️"Top Prep" bepul kursiga qoʻshilish uchun 👇 1. Botga kiring 2. 3ta do'stlaringizni taklif qiling 3. Yopiq kanalga link oling ⛓@TopPrep_bot ⛓@TopPrep_bot

14🥰3🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈4,990 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

⚡️NEW RESULT 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 8️⃣ 🔥 Listening 8.5 🔥 Reading 8.5 🔥 Writing 7 🔥 Speaking 7 This candidate who used our predicted materials achieved ⚡️8 IELTS score. Some of the exam materials [ Passage 1 and Passage 3] appeared in his IELTS exam from 🛍PREDICTION SERVICE. He is again going to buy our new prediction service even after achieving 8 score. If you need Prediction sources like this, contact @IELTSadmin571 Congrat

🔥256👍4🎉31

14 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈4,790 views37 reactionsread 16 August 2026

8️⃣ 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸

👍20🔥944

14 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈5,370 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026

This passage 3 appeared in today's IELTS exam.

🎉157🔥43

13 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC≈6,510 views64 reactionsread 16 August 2026
File

🙂 CDI Reading Mock 🔘 P1: Longaeva: Ancient Bristlecone Pine - Aug 12 🔘 P2: The importance of law - Aug 13 🔘 P3: The fruit book - Aug 13 😀 @CDIELTSsources

👍36🔥119🥰53

13 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈6,600 views152 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Bugun Real exam tushgan Passage 3 Ketadimi? 🔥

🔥12013👍11😎53

13 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈6,030 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @IELTSregistrationofficialPhoto

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️. 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🔠🔠🔠 ▫️▫️ -August/September 🔠🔠 ▪️ -August/September/October Biz orqali ro'yxatdan o'tganlarga beriladigan ➡️ Bonuslar Bizni registration xizmat bo'yicha berilgan ➡️ Fikrlar (Feedback) ➡️Ro'yxatdan o'tish uchun murojat qilish : @OFFICAL_PARTNER 🧑‍💻 @IELTSregistrationofficial Registration is FREE! 🎉 You only need to pay the official IELTS exam fee. We will complete the entire registration pr

🔥142👍1

12 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈6,820 views64 reactionsread 16 August 2026
File

🔘 CDI Format 🔘 Recent real exam passages 🔘 P1: Effect and Cause- 🔘 P2: Australia's camouflaged creatures 🔘 P3: The Piraha people of Brazil 🔘 @CDIELTSsources

45🥰8👍5🔥51

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @cdieltssources. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IELTS Sources” (@cdieltssources), 23,884 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cdieltssources.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.