Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗦𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗟 ᵕ̈

Channel

𝗦𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗟 ᵕ̈

@cdrama_Smile

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9,755subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001893998997
TypeChannel
Username@cdrama_Smile
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cdrama_Smile

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,6709,7829,7267 August 2026 — 9,670 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,670 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,689 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,693 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,706 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,734 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,701 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,741 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,718 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,767 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,782 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,759 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,755 subscribers9,7557 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,653–9,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:179,755-4
14 Sept 2026, 02:599,759-23
10 Sept 2026, 16:019,782+15
5 Sept 2026, 16:009,767+49
1 Sept 2026, 13:259,718-9
29 Aug 2026, 22:359,727-14
27 Aug 2026, 02:379,741+40
24 Aug 2026, 10:059,701-33
20 Aug 2026, 07:549,734+28
17 Aug 2026, 17:359,706+13
14 Aug 2026, 11:489,693-5
10 Aug 2026, 23:369,698+9
7 Aug 2026, 21:479,689+19
7 Aug 2026, 09:009,670no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:549,670first reading

Engagement

126 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 9,755 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 126 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held126 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total36,763
Reactions total4,294
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 42s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,367 reactions across 125 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12,20966.5%
🔥2,90815.8%
🥰7404.03%
❤‍🔥6443.51%
🤣4132.25%
👍3111.69%
😭2711.48%
🍓2001.09%
😁1550.844%
💋990.539%
🤔960.523%
💔570.31%
👏510.278%
🎄320.174%
😍260.142%
🥴220.12%
🤩210.114%
🐳170.093%
😱140.076%
🌚120.065%
14 further kinds690.376%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,367 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 125 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cdrama_Smile. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 126 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC551 views78 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

فی دو : تو میتونی بری ...ولی اگه من مرده باشم ᥫ᭡.ִֶָ 🍧#JusticeInTheDark ــ #Modu ــ #SilentReading 𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ 𐚁̸

🍓647💋6🥰1

Signed Lingvern

28 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC682 views205 reactionsread 29 August 2026

یکی از کارای چنل، اشتراکیِ درخواستیِ یکی از دوستای عزیزم بوده؛ خواننده‌ی همه‌فن‌حریف. برای یه مدت کوتاه گذاشتمش تو مجموعه‌ی اشتراکی، ولی الان می‌خوام اینجا بذارمش. البته به شرطی که حمایت بشه؛ زیر ۴۰۰ تا لایک قبول نمی‌کنم‌ها! 🌸

🥰16827🔥5🍓2🥴2😭1

Signed Lingvern

28 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC890 views111 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

همیشه برام سواله چرا برومنس چینی صد-هیچ همه‌ی BL ها رو می‌زنه. مثلاً به اینا نگاه کنین، می‌شه براشون مرد😭 ᥫ᭡.ִֶָ 🍧 #edit 𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ 𐚁̸

88😭15🔥7👍1

Signed Lingvern

28 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC860 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

32

Signed Lingvern

28 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC855 views82 reactionsread 29 August 2026

اینکه شخصیتا رو انقدر خوشگل درست میکنی یعنی اینکه میخوای وسوسمون کنی؟

82

Signed Niusha

28 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC850 views96 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ملو اینکه خوشم اومد یعنی چی ؟ یعنی چی من اینجوری نبودم

🥰7414😁8

Signed Niusha

28 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC856 views135 reactionsread 29 August 2026

سرطان براتون پیدا کردم، هنوز موندم ترجمه کنم یا نه

118😱9🔥5🍓2🤔1

Signed Lingvern

28 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC853 views157 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ONLY FOR TONIGHT 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 جونم براتون بگه : اولیور یه پسر آروم و خجالتی بود که همیشه هوس‌های کثیفش رو قایم کرده بود. تا اینکه یه شب تصمیم گرفت همه چیز رو ریسک کنه. توی یه سایت خاص، فانتزی تاریکش رو نوشت: یه شب با سه مرد ناشناس که صورت‌شون رو ماسک زده باشن. شب هالووین، توی یه مهمونی پر از دود و نور قرمز، سه تا مرد با ماسک اومدن سراغش. اون شب فقط یه فانتزی نبود… و اولیور فهمید که یه شب هیچ‌وقت کافی نیست.« اولیور ...می

132🔥11🍓7😱5🥴2

Signed Lingvern

27 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,030 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

خاندان جانگ به دو شاخه تقسیم شده بود یکی از آن‌ها جانگِ شمالی بود، جانگِ اصیل گفته می‌شد که اعضای این خاندان خالکوبیِ کیلین را روی بدن داشتند ᥫ᭡.ִֶָ 🌳 #DaomuBiji #دائومو_بیجی 𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ 𐚁̸

78🎄2

Signed Lingvern

27 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,150 views291 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

ᥫ᭡.ִֶָ 🍧#BurnedBound 𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ 𐚁̸ SMILENOVEL

272🐳8🍓5❤‍🔥2🎄2💋2

Signed Lingvern

27 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,090 views181 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Burned & Bound این تیکه از داستان خیلی برام قشنگ بود :: به جکسون لبخند زدم—به مردی که انگیزه داده بود تا آدم بهتری بشم. کسی که بهم نشون داده بود زندگیم چقدر می‌تونه خوب باشه و درست وقتی من رو دیده بود که خودم حتی خودم رو هم نمی‌دیدم. به مردی که با تمام قوا چنان بهم باور داشت که حس می‌کردم از پس هر کاری برمی‌آمدم. «آره کابوی، ردیفم.» و واقعاً ردیف بودم. من عاشق زندگیمون توی وست هیون بودم. عاشق جکسون بودم. اما مهم‌تر

178🍓3

Signed Lingvern

Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @cdrama_Smile. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗦𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗟 ᵕ̈” (@cdrama_Smile), 9,755 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cdrama_Smile.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.