Channel
@cdrommm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,244subscribers
+163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001353564780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cdrommm |
| Created | 30 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cdrommm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 9,244 | +63 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 9,181 | +41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 9,140 | +47 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 9,093 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 9,111 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 9,104 | +34 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 9,070 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 9,064 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 9,075 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 9,080 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 9,081 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (3 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 58,266 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cdrommm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
все как я представлял, ахуенно 10/10 фактурность героев сумасшедшая, локации оч сильно проработаны, вроде ниче не уронили, вайб гташки сохранен максимально. ооооочень интересно сколько она будет весить и как железо ps5 с этим собирается справляться....
выглядит оч хорошо
Netflix R.I.P 🥲
#Ref собрал реф из канала DAFES ребята держат в курсе того что происходит в дизайне, моде, визуале. Нашел у них пару игрулек для дизайнеров по типу проверь симметрию или потренируй пен тул, сам в них залипал и рекомендовал ученикам. советую заглянуть в гости ТГК
cd-®om TOYOTA club
вот так новости, очередной стартап / оппозиция подехал. самое главный вопрос, зачем? обычно внутри больших компаний такое делают для звездочек на ревью, а через пол годика забивают из-за того что не стрельнуло, а стрелять тут нечему. создать просто копию тг нет смысла, мы тут терпеть будем все блокировки, другое дело когда ты создаешь что-то новое или миксовое, чтобы человек понимал ради какой фичи ему это надо, ос…
keep driving порекомендовал кореш, вчера трайнул ночью, точно советую. сначала немного бесит своей управляемостью, но привыкаешь. суть простая, ехать по карте на фестиваль, но по дороге че только не происходит и концовка может оказаться другой, их там минимум 9 сейчас вот еду с невестой которая сбежала со свадьбы и начинает подкатывать, у меня еще ебашит перк что я давно не мылся, все не могу добраться до отеля, …
ночная шиза про анти-дизайн Youtube
Нашел новую соц сетку posting2 <3 очень похожа на Splay как визуально так и по концепту, аля даунгрейд инсты. Самое пиздатое в таких проектах, что люди не выкладывают ультравыебанные фотографии и лента выглядит ну оч вайбово. Залетайте, меня легко найти.
обложки в Spacemorgue отдельный вид искусства читать не рекомендую
арт-группа "МУХОМОР" Москва 1978 вспомнил про ребят и пошел почитать, нашел вот такой всратенький сайт, советую изучить, много прикольных мыслей, аля андерграунд / anti-design core Наша деятельность лежит за гранью этого понятия и находится на грани человеческого понимания. Всё это так тонко, что мы сами едва ли что-нибудь в этом смыслим.
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @cdrommm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cd-rom” (@cdrommm), 9,244 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cdrommm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.