Channel
@celaxsaty
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,162subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002121213438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @celaxsaty |
| Created | 17 November 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/celaxsaty |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 1,162 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 1,159 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,164 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 1,165 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,161 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 1,159 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 1,157 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 1,156 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,156 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
495 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5242704224168455550 | 245 | 49.5% | |
| 🕊 | 187 | 37.8% | |
| ⚡ | 63 | 12.7% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 495 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2025 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Уход из жизни Ольги Георгиевны Джанаевой — невосполнимая утрата для осетинской культуры. Её вклад в народную музыку сложно оценить сегодня; истинный масштаб этого наследия мы, возможно, осознаем лишь спустя годы. Я хочу выразить огромную благодарность за возможность учиться у этой великой женщины. Ольга Георгиевна посеяла в моём сердце глубокую любовь к осетинской музыке, которая остаётся для меня маяком, ведущим до…
🕊71
В абсолютном восторге от концерта ансамбля «Симд», который прошёл в рамках дней культуры Южной Осетии в Москве. Приезжайте чаще, пожалуйста!
🕊38
дождливый закат #квайса #октябрь25
custom 524270422416845555052⚡12🕊9
На днях меня очень порадовала новость о том, что мои родственники из Южной Осетии восстановили старинный храм в селе Шиндара Знаурского района. Храму более 200 лет. Он был разрушен во время землетрясения 1991 года. Работы по его восстановлению велись местными жителями на протяжении трёх месяцев. Инициатором восстановления и меценатом выступил предприниматель Давид Келехсаев. Очень трогает видеть неравнодушное отнош…
custom 524270422416845555027⚡6🕊6
🍋 Дизайн этикеток для напитков из Осетии, разработанный ещё в советские времена. Все эти образцы представлены как часть постоянной экспозиции в Национальном музее во Владикавказе. #осетинский_дизайн
custom 524270422416845555031⚡14🕊7
В библиотеке @barzafcag1 сегодня появился фотоальбом 1989 года с фотографиями ансамбля «Симд». Я уже его с большим интересом полистала) Очень понравилась вёрстка, особенно приятно было полюбоваться тем, как собраны коллажи. Советую посмотреть альбом полностью, потому что он очень красивый 🤍🙌🏻
custom 524270422416845555020🕊7⚡5
🌞Мы давно не любовались сокровищами, поэтому предлагаю начать выходные красиво с изящным скифским зайчиком из коллекции The Metropolitan Art Museum. Кстати, слышали что-нибудь про зайца, который как-то расстроил сражение скифов и войска царя Дария? Вот любопытный кусочек из эпизода книги «История» Геродота про это: Когда скифы уже стояли в боевом строю, то сквозь их ряды проскочил заяц. Заметив зайца, скиф…
custom 524270422416845555021🕊8⚡6
[книжка «путник» — бæлццон — за авторством т. темирова, издательство «ир», орджоникидзе, ссср, 1981 год]
custom 524270422416845555012⚡9🕊3
Озеро «Мады цассыг» (с осет. «слеза матери») на Кельском плато Южной Осетии в память о жертвах Бесланской трагедии 🕊️
custom 524270422416845555036🕊32
Давно не слышала искреннего и душевного исполнения осетинских песен, поэтому очень обрадовалась, когда меня нашло это видео 🥺 Какое-то чудо, честно 🤍👏🏻
custom 524270422416845555046⚡11🕊6
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @celaxsaty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“čelæxsaty” (@celaxsaty), 1,162 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/celaxsaty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.