Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💜 ׄ 𝑪el࣪estαlֺ︩︪ '& 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 ˖

Channel

💜 ׄ 𝑪el࣪estαlֺ︩︪ '& 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 ˖

@celestal1gg

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004499479083
TypeChannel
Username@celestal1gg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 23 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/celestal1gg

Previous handles

@celestal1gg was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@celestal1gg
held 11 August 202611 August 2026

Growth

182119.58 August 2026 — 18 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19 subscribers198 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 08:3419-2
24 Aug 2026, 06:3721+1
11 Aug 2026, 16:0220no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:3620+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:3418first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
2m 45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👻1615.7%
💅1615.7%
👾1312.7%
😇1110.8%
🔥109.80%
😈109.80%
💘98.82%
🤯98.82%
🍓87.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kittyggoi

4>>>>115!!! давайте побьем и закроем набор?

7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC54 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

|🪦🔹ELESTAL 🦄🎀𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕖𝕓𝕒𝕔𝕜 | 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐚 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞, 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞, 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞 ➖➿➖➿➖🌟➖➿➖➿➖ ꯱𝐨݊ꪀᧁׁ : 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 🦄 ву; 𝓒𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓵 🦄 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒆 𝑩𝒂𝒃𝒚𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓 🎀 ➖➿➖➿➖🦄➖➿➖➿➖ 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐚 𝐛𝐨𝐬𝐬, 𝐛𝐨𝐬𝐬, 𝐛𝐨𝐬𝐬. 📰: @celestal1gg 📺: @celestal.oi

👾4💅3💘3🔥1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC347 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🎀— COMEBACK 🎀🦄| セレスタル 🎀🦄Celestal is always ahead 🍧 ➖➿➖➿➖🥚➖➿➖➿➖ 🪦🤩🪦 ׅ꯱𝐨𝐧𝐠 : ᴄʟ𝒊𝒄𝒌 ᴄʟ𝒂𝒄𝒌 ву: 𝓥𝓮𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓮𝓷, 𝓛𝓲𝓷𝓪, 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓲, 🧁 𝓐𝓻𝓵𝓲𝓷, 𝓨𝓪𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓮 🍇 ➖➿➖➿➖🤩➖➿➖➿➖ 𝕮𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝖈𝖑𝖆𝖈𝖐, 𝖍𝖊𝖊𝖑𝖘 𝖙𝖆𝖕, 𝖜𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖐𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖍 𝖒𝖞 𝖍𝖎𝖕𝖘 𝖇𝖆𝖌 ➖➿➖➿➖🌟➖➿➖➿➖ 📰: @celestal1gg 📺: @celestal.oi

💅7💘4👾3🍓2🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC191 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#🎀🎀𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 🦄 𝒔𝒐𝒐𝒏... 🎀 🥹🥹 🥹 🤩🪦𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙀𝘽𝘼𝘾𝙆 🪦🤩 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➿➖➿🦄➿➖➿➖ 📰: @celestal1gg 📺: @celestal.oi

🔥5😈5💅4👻2👾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @celestal1gg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💜 ׄ 𝑪el࣪estαlֺ︩︪ '& 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 ˖” (@celestal1gg), 19 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/celestal1gg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.